The new law specifically provides that the U.S. Secretary of Education has no authority to require states to implement
any kind of teacher evaluation system, and that all waivers have no legal effect on or after Aug. 1, 2016.
By Valerie Strauss August 17, 2010; 11:23 AM ET Categories: Daniel Willingham, Guest Bloggers, Teachers Tags: daniel willingham, la times story, la times story on teachers, los angeles times and teachers, research and value added, teacher evaluation, value added evaluation, value added measures Save & Share: Previous: The best
kind of teacher evaluation Next: The problem with abolishing the»D»
Not exact matches
No Child Left Behind was not great for us either, but certainly Race to the Top» ratcheted everything up, because it became clear that for districts in need to get money that they would have to make all these
kinds of measure and punish ideas that they'd put across, like the
teacher evaluation piece and all
of that.
TEACHER EVALUATION TALKS STILL GOING ON: The last we heard, talks between state education officials and
teachers» leaders reportedly produced significant progress toward the end
of last week, so there's a chance they'll reach some
kind of accord this week.
Ravitch has a piece in The New York Review
of Books this month arguing against this
kind of reliance on
teacher evaluations.
A court victory in the
teacher -
evaluation case would clear the decks for even more thoroughgoing reforms
of teacher preparation and support
of the
kind that Ruszkowski has indicated he is interested in pursuing.
Moreover, this is exactly the
kind of policy the AFT previously opposed for
teacher evaluations.
Interestingly enough, nearly every time that I ask these
kinds of questions, the
teacher points out the one thing that I was concerned about, and I can simply respond with excerpts from the
evaluation notes that corroborate our mutual understanding.
It struck me that no one in attendance had much thought about how this
kind of design would compromise current efforts to use assessment results for accountability or
teacher evaluation, or about how this would sow legitimate doubts among
teachers and parents regarding fairness in a high - stakes environment.
By
kind of embedding this process
of evaluation and making it all about
teacher voice,
teachers are the champions here... and I think that's a critical thing with this.»
«
Teachers and students thrive in the
kind of settings that we describe as research - rich, and research - rich schools and colleges are those that are likely to have the greatest capacity for self -
evaluation and self - improvement.»
This 2012 report by the Northwest
Evaluation Association and Grunwald Associates LLC describes feedback from parents and
teachers on what
kinds of assessments are most useful, relevant, and cost effective, and makes recommendations for assessment developers, policymakers, and state and district leaders based on their findings.
A study published by Education Next in 2012 looked at how some
kinds of evaluations can improve
teacher performance.
But the opposition to value - added testing is potent, as
teacher unions have been fighting virtually any
kind of performance - based
evaluations of their members.
The walkthrough people have a perspective, and that's different from
teacher evaluation and professional development... you know, they're all
kind of different camps.
There is a new contract, a new
evaluation system, new principals, a much better rubric for principals to guide
teachers in the classroom — the
kinds of internal things that change the way schools are run.
Studies show that feedback from this
kind of evaluation improves student achievement because it helps
teachers get better at what they do.
If we harness this passion, give them a say in their own professional learning and offer ongoing support we can create an
evaluation system that guides
teachers towards instructional mastery and makes sure all students get the
kind of instruction they need to succeed.
The first
of its
kind, this
teacher evaluation model is not only based on studies that correlate instructional strategies to student achievement, but is also grounded on experimental / control studies that establish a direct causal link between elements
of the model and student results.
But such comments — in which
teachers offer advice, praise, criticism, or
evaluation — don't provide the
kind of descriptive feedback that can help students improve their performance, writes Grant Wiggins in this article.
What
kind of standard is the U.S. Department
of Education putting in place as part
of its process for approving revamped
teacher evaluation systems states are required to put in place in exchange for receiving a waiver?
Many
kinds of laws can be called related to
teachers» collective bargaining, including parent choice rules,
teacher evaluation frameworks, and even a state's overall levels
of taxation and spending.
«We want all
teachers to have that
kind of spark when kids walk into their classrooms and not be relegated to thinking they have to do things in a very prescriptive way for their
evaluation,» she said.
The task force itself may recommend decoupling test scores from
evaluations or putting in place some
kind of moratorium on
teacher evaluations, a move that would please many
teachers and administrators.
I'm not going to dictate
teacher evaluations from DPI,» he says, noting that his preferred method
of measuring success would be to track students after they graduate, to see what
kinds of jobs they're getting.
And considering the low - quality
of subjective classroom observations that are the norm for traditional
teacher evaluation systems, the state laws and collective bargaining agreements governing
teacher performance management discourage school leaders from providing more - ample feedback, and that the use
of objective student test score growth data is just coming into play, few
teachers have gotten the
kind of feedback needed to build such expertise in the first place.
On another front, the bill would prohibit the
kind of public release
of teacher evaluation data that has set off storms
of protest in New York City, where individual ratings for 18,000
teachers were posted on line.
«It was an example
of the
kind of contract that existed in some school districts where the limitations placed on
teachers» time and the specificity
of what administrators had to do [for] an
evaluation [to] hold weight was so rigid that more often than not,
teachers could not be evaluated out
of the school system.»
Using «Multiple Measures» Does Not Reduce Testing: Combining standardized test scores with other
kinds of information in
teacher evaluation systems — known as the «multiple measures» strategy — does nothing to reduce the disruption testing brings to school routines and student learning.
Efforts to legislate statewide
teacher -
evaluation systems,
of the
kind championed by the Obama administration in Race to the Top and as a condition for No Child Left Behind waivers, may be a whole different kettle
of fish
Concerned parents and community members should insist on fair, broad - based systems
of evaluation, as well as on the other
kinds of support that
teachers need to succeed.
When this
kind of evaluation is new to a school,
teachers may feel apprehensive about talking with students in a way that changes traditional power relationships within the school.
It was a great example
of professional collaboration that is called for in the frameworks shaping education today, from Charlotte Danielson's Framework for Teaching (specifically, components 4d and 4e) to the National Policy Board for Educational Administration standards (which places the
kind of collaborative work that Troy's
teachers are demonstrating at the core
of two
of their standards for the
evaluation school leadership).
To enable
teacher evaluations, another 47 points would be allocated based on the quality
of a state's «data systems» for tracking student performance in all grades — which is a euphemism for the
kind of full - bore testing regime that makes many parents and children cringe but that the reformers argue is necessary for any serious attempt to track not only student progress but also
teacher effectiveness.
Given that observations «can be hugely time consuming, and given the serious workload challenges already facing
teachers, there is an urgent need for further
evaluation of other
kinds of lesson observation to understand where, when and whether they may be effective in developing practice», she said.
One approach to portfolios is the Learning Record, which structures the
kinds of evidence
of learning
teachers and students assemble and provides a structure for
evaluation and feedback to students and parents.
Furthermore, as the
teacher evaluation system comes down the pipe, what does this
kind of grading system mean for the
teachers and schools who serve these students?