Sentences with phrase «kind of teaching in»

We see Isaiah talk about this kind of teaching in Isaiah 28.

Not exact matches

The New York City - based «Academy» Urbaniak runs is aimed at teaching women how to communicate in influential and powerful ways, and get more of what they want in all kinds of relationships, from the office boardroom to the bedroom.

Kotowych teaches classes and competes in Crossfit, a kind of frenetic fitness regimen that combines Olympic weightlifting and lung - busting cardio routines.

«Because the only other way you can get extra money to go in, if you wanted the same number of people, the same kind of teaching, would be to take it from working people through their taxes.

We can model and teach the skills that will equip them to lead themselves and others in this hyper - competitive world, or we can allow them to fall victim to the kind of thinking that makes them slaves to the status quo.

It beats the daylights out of the best phone app because you don't have to stop doing whatever you're doing while you wash your hands and find your phone and open the right app and - sorry Alexa - the simple barcode also has all the detail and specificity that you really need for this kind of order built right in so that you don't have to spend time teaching Siri or Alexa the entire taxonomy of the Safeway snack aisle.

I tried all kinds of ways to make money online What works best for me is koocam I teach my hobbies and sell my knowledge in every field It's great

There are a lot of books out there that explain how to do DCF valuations and I would highly recommend Aswath Damodaran's free online course on valuation where he teaches how to do DCF valuations if you are interested in those kinds of valuation techniques.

Because of a court case in Louisiana that expressly forbid Biblical Creationism being taught in school science classes, the wording changed and the authors removed references to catastrophism, a world - wide flood, a recent inception of the earth or life, the concept of kinds, or any concepts from Genesis.

The Pharisees were the group who taught that the letter of the law kills, and thus were seen as merciful and kind (Josephus), versus the Sadducees who didn't believe in the «oral teachings» and thus read the Tanach very literally and applied it literally.

Kind of like when the Catholics got teaching religion banned from being taught in schools.

«He's kind of a famous neocon,» Mary Gordon, who teaches at Barnard, was quoted as saying in an article in the Columbia Spectator («Catholics Divided Over Father's Politics,» April 6, 2006).

My kind of conservatives are very interested in knowledge, and our offsprings are taught that.

The treatment of the Nazi period in all its aspects - Hitler's rise to power; his establishment of a dictatorship in Germany; the abolition of the rule of law; the persecution of all kinds of political opponents; the racially motivated persecution of the Jews, culminating in the Holocaust; the reticence and opposition of German citizens; and, Germany's instigation of World War II - is compulsory teaching matter at all types of schools in Germany and at all levels of education.

If you raise your children in the right kind of environment and teach them to respect themselves and marriage then yes I believe she will be with only one man.

For a Catholic - ish novel — for a novel of any kind, really — the book is aggressively sexual in its interests, and McKenna's dismissal of Church teaching on sex is more casual than is sustainably credible.

The kind I thought was being taught in divinity school (among other places (such as found in the beauty of nature in the middle of our hearts)-RRB-.

Indeed the desire of the counter-cultural types to take charge of the education of their own children seemed a reasonable extension of the kind of liberty we were being taught, in the public school, that America had been founded to protect, and a rational response to the kind of oppressive social control some of the cooler teachers taught (this was a college town, as I said) capitalist society imposed.

Whether it is changing text books to teach religion as a «science,» making laws that prohibit stem - cell research which would without question help those in need, to stopping of any kind of gay rights, trying to put religion (christianity) into schools, a woman's right to choose, etc, etc...

They can «study» their religion, but it still comes down to faith in the teachings, and personal experience, neither of which can ever be meaningfully tested true or false in any kind of objective way.

The real damage these kind of churches do, especially to children, is they teach them to live their lives in fear.

I want that kind of power and hypocrisy in my life and to teach it to my kids!

I am also so disappointed that this kind of teaching is going on in a church claiming to be non-denominational.

The Institutional Church (ecclesia) has killed only two kinds of people: Those who do not believe in the teachings of Jesus Christ, and those who do.

Ephesians 5:21 - 33's teaching on marriage is about changing that view of marriage to one of unity and love — the kind of love that could transform the authority - subordinate nature of first - century Ephesian marriages, into what God desires for marriage in the New Covenant: oneness, companionship and mutuality.

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

In the 1518 tract, Luther lays out an idea that is central to all Lutheran teaching: There are two kinds of righteousness, civil and spiritual.

You say, we have all these teachings and society has moved away from these teachings in all kinds of ways; and this creates this incredible tension between New Testament sexual ethics and the way we all live now.

But if we take Ezekiel's teaching as a whole we shall not suspect him of the kind of pure individualism in religion which has become familiar in the modern world.

But frankly, all the pastors ought to be doing in the first place is being a servant and a slave to others — that's what a pastor is anyway, at least what sketchy little bits of «pastor» roles can be made out in the NT, as it's scarcely mentioned — not necessarily standing up there and teaching everyone two or three times a week, running the show, and acting like some kind of CEO.

Evangelical church and in fact all torch bearer of morality should come out and advocate ban on assault weapons and all kinds of violence if they truly believe in what they teach.

(unless he is referring to teaching it to his kids or something) He was never trained in any form of evolutionary or any other kind of science.

But because the God I serve — albeit in an often stumbling, up - and - down, sometimes trusting, sometimes doubting, sometimes just totally lost and needing him kind of way — is incredibly gracious and good, He's taught me so much more than that.

Of course faithful Christians constantly mediate between the teachings of the Church and our needs in the moment, but the «moral complexity» mindset tempts us to recast this tendency as a kind of sophisticatioOf course faithful Christians constantly mediate between the teachings of the Church and our needs in the moment, but the «moral complexity» mindset tempts us to recast this tendency as a kind of sophisticatioof the Church and our needs in the moment, but the «moral complexity» mindset tempts us to recast this tendency as a kind of sophisticatioof sophistication.

I figure that at the very least, it teaches people not to make those kinds of statements in my presence.

maybe our government could issue a new kind of press release: in keeping with the teachings of Jesus... 3 children and their parents -LCB- militants -RCB- were terminated with CIA drones today.

While it is of course true that those who belong to this school are perhaps most vocal in their assertion that in our Lord alone may God be seen at work, and while it is they who denounce the concept of «general» revelation as a vain fancy of sub-Christian speculation, a considerable number of other Christian thinkers take what in effect is the same position when they make central to their teaching a kind of uniqueness in the coming and the person of Christ which effectively removes him from the context of the total sell - expressive operation of the Eternal Word.

Practices of teaching and learning are not different in kind from practices of governance and self - maintenance, as though one type were «concrete» and the other not, one type «institutionalized» and the other not.

I left Methodism upon graduation from high school, concluding that while the community had nurtured me all my life, I could not accept all of the teachings in any kind of literal way.

In the teaching of Jesus nothing of this kind is found, rather the warning against all such calculation:

Christ came among men with a simple ministry of teaching whose main purpose was to confirm that the kinds of ways in which God had been understood in Natural religion, and the very language used to express those insights, were broadly right.

In fact, incredibly, they placed demands on the assumed power of men by teaching them to be kind to their slaves, to be gentle with their children, to love their wives; they addressed the powerless within a patriarchal society.

Those who use Minus's book to teach the next generation how Rauschenbusch brought many in a previous generation, most of a denomination and much of ecumenical Protestantism to embrace «Social Christianity» may, want to translate his material into that kind of revealing art Which simultaneously embraces evocative parable and systematic clarification.

Perhaps, however, there may be a barrier in Buddhist teaching to applying compassion to this kind of task.

In fact, I've been taught that homosexuality is just about the worst kind of sin that there is, one we ought to protest against and make laws about.

Hittinger correctly points out that this new Thomism finds its point of reference in the human experience: «The Church has held Thomas as the master because humans themselves thirst for the kind of wisdom Thomas pursued and taught.

What about the examples of this same kind of teaching that are, on occasions, still present in the New Testament?

When I read this, about 15 years ago, I was stunned that God wanted His people to use the tithe to celebrate with our families and to help the less financially «properous» people (instead of judging them) I had such mixed feelings, of freedom and joy in God but also a kind of betrayal from what has been taught, almost to scare us.

There is only one way it could not be, and that is if you decide that it teaches that nihilism is the truth, revealed here by the pointless failure of Davis's career, so that his having to obtain abortions for women he impregnated is just another absurd, annoying, and energy - sapping aspect of that, his irrational guilt instincts causing him to have to scrounge for money, and so that his learning that one of these abortions didn't occur is just another sort of misfortune, saddling him with sentiments that he will have no way to really act upon (it is unlikely the that the mother of the child wants to see him), and probably causing him to draw some kind of superstitious karmic connection between a random coincidence of having hit a cat that looks just like one he abandoned, and his driving by the town his child may be living in.

A big chunk of Christian indoctrination is teaching people how to «see» God in all kinds of things.