What
kind of text proof will I receive?
Not exact matches
(And rendering only a partial quote is much like biblical
proof texting in my opinion) I am
kind of a stickler on such details, as a sloppy portrayal
of another's words often leads to inaccurate representation
of their intent.
To be deep in history is certainly, for instance, to cease to be an evangelical
of the
kind who allows experience to trump doctrine, who believes doctrine can be read off the surface
of the biblical
text, and who sees no theological or existential problem that can not be solved with a
proof text or two.
But using two
proof texts, Genesis 3:16 («To the woman he said, «I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing...»») and Titus 2:4 - 5 («and so train the young women to love their husbands and children, to be sensible, chaste, domestic,
kind, and submissive to their husbands»), he nevertheless concludes: «Wife, mother, homemaker - this is the appointed destiny
of real womanhood.
All the semiological systems, along with the linguistic system, must be decoded, and, as Ricoeur says, «that requires a special affinity between the reader and the
kind of things the
text is about» (19) What is appropriated is not a system
of ideas but deep values
of truth that are imposed «with such power that no further
proof is needed to perceive their validity and reality».
But since the New Testament itself contains various
kinds of social witness — as its use both for and against slavery and patriarchy, for example, shows — debate can degenerate into mere thrust and parry
of proof -
texts with no possibility
of resolution, or
of even honest concession that both sides can claim biblical warrant.