Sentences with phrase «kind of theology»

If you get a chance to read it after I get it posted you can tell us what kind of theology you think it is.
Is it the next phase in a scholarly, sophisticated kind of theology?
However, it is not enough for us to criticize existentialist and other kinds of theology that have neglected the environment.
And there are many different kinds of theology: historical, systematic, practical, black, liberation — in fact, a «theology of» just about every movement and topic that requires serious thought and...
The quality of the essays in this volume, the range of issues that the church is facing in China, and the theological methodologies that it is devising to handle them suggest that in the near future a new kind of theology may come from this part of the world.
What I can't stand are the present - day, praise choruses that reflect a Jesus - is - my - boyfriend kind of theology.
Thus the two kinds of theology need each other, and we may best define their relation by adapting a famous dictum of Kant: «Without believing theology all scientific theology is empty, and without scientific theology all believing theology is blind.»
When Lisa and I started deconstructing, our transition into a different kind of theology and spirituality was not only ground - shaking for us personally, but it put our relationship to an extreme test.
The range of issues that the churches face in China, and the theological methodologies that they are devising to handle them suggest that in the near future a new kind of theology may come from this part of the world.
This is why I oppose the kinds of theologies that insist God always promises success, prosperity, ease, health, and every other good thing.
I suggest that it really is not «hermeneutics» at all, neither «process» hermeneutics nor any other, although it nonetheless is certainly a kind of theology, even a kind of «Biblical theology.»
This is right On Jeremy, when any kind of theology discussions starts I run the other way and just go make disciples, at least I am accomplishing something then.
«Your kind of theology does not touch our lives.»
Another clear example of this kind of theology can be found in John Hick.
They are surrounded with another kind of theology which might simply be characterized as Christian culture.
But even this kind of theology separates it from the lives o church people.
What then will demythologizing mean for these two kinds of theology?
Among Lutherans, I believe, this kind of theology plays an exceptionally large role, whereas it is peripheral among United Methodists.
This kind of theology remains an academic discipline in which a Christian can participate only by extensive specialization in academia.
I spend a lot of time thinking about how people with my kind of theology, have acted in the past, and I am convinced that splits inevitably diminish the influence of the kind of orthodoxy that I cherish — for at least two reasons.
Special revelations — the only sort recognized by this kind of theology — have always needed to be checked by some more general frame of reference: the written Scriptures coolly and historically studied, the tradition and common experience of the church, and the still more general experiences and tested beliefs of mankind.
You wrote: but what Kaiser fails to understand is that it is exactly the kind of theology he presents in this book which has caused most of those people to leave the church and give up on God.
Kaiser thinks this is a bad thing (I think it is good), but what Kaiser fails to understand is that it is exactly the kind of theology he presents in this book which has caused most of those people to leave the church and give up on God.
Obviously it is inspired by the kind of theology that says love is violent and that God, out of love, exacts pain and torture...
As with a number (although not all) of the post-apocalyptic films of recent years, The Hunger Games is strikingly absent of any kind of theology.
The sermon is a kind of theology and in its more powerful shapes it does have the same authority as music.
No ancient theologian has been closer to the center of discussions about the viability of Christian Platonism than Gregory of Nyssa, and no contemporary Protestant theologian has been more enamored of the kind of theology he represents than Hans Boersma.
The kind of theology you hold is determined by that which you take to be of supreme importance.
As a result of the self - enclosure of this kind of theology, its treatment of revelation could not receive much nourishment from other traditions.
Responding to the kind of theology that suggests hurricanes and earthquakes and school shootings happen because an angry God has lost his temper and is unleashing his wrath and discipline on people whose sin nature makes them incapable of understanding such actions as loving, Kat R. writes:
A second important approach has replaced some of the kind of theology I have identified.
A major exception to this kind of theology is that of «process theology» based on insights of A. N. Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z