These kinds of achievement tests, however, are not designed to measure school quality (yet they are often used to do just that).
Not exact matches
This issue's research section offers a first -
of - its -
kind study examining the impact
of instructor quality on student
achievement in the higher education sector — finding that students taught by above - average instructors receive higher grades and
test scores, are more likely to succeed in subsequent courses, and earn more college credits.
Two
kinds of standardized
achievement tests commonly used for school evaluations are ill suited for that measurement.
A second
kind of instructionally insensitive
test is the sort
of standardized
achievement test that many states have developed for accountability during the past two decades.
The
test incentivizes the
kind of teaching and learning disadvantaged students need to close pernicious
achievement gaps in ELA.
That said, due to
test prep and other
kinds of manipulation, «
achievement increases may not correspond to actual learning gains» and «reading and math gains came at the expense
of instruction in other subjects.»
That is, chartering is a movement that began with the aspiration
of starting many
kinds of schools, but it may have morphed into one that is only adept at starting one type
of school: a highly structured school that is run by a CMO or an EMO and whose goal is to close
achievement gaps for low - income kids
of color while producing exceptional
test scores.
Grade - level
achievement tests that report grade - equivalent scores outside
of the grade level being
tested, really don't provide that
kind of information.
Hanushek is lamenting that the kids were not given «
achievement tests» before they started kindergarten!?!?! Ignoring the logistic nightmare that such a program would cause, children that young can not be
tested with the
kinds of tests used in schools (he actually, wrote that folks: «no
achievement tests were given before kindergarten» (p. 31).
Our introduction lists six reasons for maintaining a repertoire
of strategies, namely that strategies are tools for designing thoughtful lessons and units, differentiating teaching and learning, bringing lessons alive, building skills for
tests, improving student
achievement, and building different
kinds of knowledge.
For Tennessee's version
of the value - added method to work properly, however, student
test scores must be statistically converted to a special
kind of analytic scale so that student
achievement gains in particular content areas represent the same amount
of growth at different grade levels.
Related: Common Core
tests will widen the
achievement gap at first Thirty - five states have no exit exam at all and seven have exit exams
of some other
kind — end -
of - course
tests, New York's Regents
tests, California's CAHSEE, a civics exam, etc. — but will not be using a sole
test score to allow seniors to graduate or not.
This was the first scientific study
of its
kind in the US, and it sought to answer if merit pay alone, independent
of other resources and support, increased student
achievement as measured by
test scores.
* The specific
tests used, which emphasize some
kinds of learning and not others, and which rarely measure
achievement that is well above or below grade level.
Those early - on decisions will have a powerful influence on the
kinds of statewide
achievement tests ultimately employed.