Sentences with phrase «kinds of attacks on»

These are the very people who will be turned off by the kinds of attacks on immigrants and «benefit scroungers» launched in recent months.
They seem to think that any attempt to stop them from forcing their beliefs on us is some kind of attack on their religious freedoms.
An unnamed pastor said the couple attended his church and added: «We are very concerned about this selective kind of attack on non-locals who are also Christians in this region,» the pastor said.
This kind of attack on Canon Law, with all its privileges over secular law, was «revolutionary» and was felt as a frightening threat even by some laity, who saw the walls of the conventional world crumbling with its disappearance.
«We have congress actually poised to escalate the kind of attacks on abortion and contraception and even going after Obamacare,» said Andrea Miller, the president of the National Institute for Reproductive Health.
But while this approach may chime with the kind of attacks on «Remoaners» we saw on the front page of today's Daily Mail, it is a trick that can only be deployed for a limited amount of time.
I hope people do not take this as some kind of attack on low carb diets — couldn't be farther from the truth.
The film starts and ends with images of a grinning Tony Blair — billboards hanging ominously on the edge of shot — but it's a stretch to view Kill Your Friends as any kind of attack on»90s superficiality or the betrayals of Blairism.
«It's kind of an attack on your culture, on your beliefs.
The letter was drafted before Cuccinelli's action, but water expert Peter Gleick, one of the authors, told the Washington Post that the attorney general's demand «is precisely the kind of attack on climate scientists that the letter criticizes.»
For instance, Lynas now finds himself accused of the kind of attack on his integrity he was once proud to be involved in.
«And then, you know the real reason why they need some kind of attack on me?

Not exact matches

At this point, the indications are that Aghdam's attack was the kind of event that has become all too familiar in American society: an isolated act committed by a person with a shaky grip on reality.
Those prerequisites include terminating America's military presence in South Korea as well as ending the U.S. regional nuclear umbrella, a security arrangement in which Washington promises in - kind retaliation on behalf of close allies if they are attacked with nuclear weapons.
As such, cyber attacks of any kind will have far more psychological impact than on other dates.
«In some kind of weird way,» he writes, «I thought of it as my «I Walk the Line,» a song I'd always considered to be up there at the top, one of the most mysterious and revolutionary of all time, a song that makes an attack on your most vulnerable spots....
It will either be something you learn to do on your own or something you learn through a heart attack or some kind of emotional breakdown.
«We have made it quite clear that the FBI will not tolerate any kind of retribution or attack on the Muslim community,» said Arthur Balizan, special agent in charge of the FBI in Oregon,» yeah but they wont do a damn thing when the Muslim's attack us... go figure...
«We have made it quite clear that the FBI will not tolerate any kind of retribution or attack on the Muslim community,» said Arthur Balizan, special agent in charge of the FBI in Oregon, on Sunday.
Neither Jeff nor Cecilia made any kind of personal attack on you, they just expressed their opinion, yet you castigate both of them with sarcasm and insults.
Of course his attack was on a particular kind of Lutheran pietistic practice with which he was all too familiaOf course his attack was on a particular kind of Lutheran pietistic practice with which he was all too familiaof Lutheran pietistic practice with which he was all too familiar.
The destruction of the monastic houses was an attack on a kind of approach to Christianity which was contemplative, ordered and quiet.
I'm an atheist and I'm not attacking anyone, as a matter of fact I don't think about this kind of stuff on daily basis.
When we think of all that has come from him in the impulse toward human freedom and dignity — the challenge of ignorance and the attempt to remedy it, the concern for and conquest of disease, the sensitivity to the needs and plight of the weak, destitute, helpless, and those in every kind of suffering, the stabilizing of the inner lives of millions of his followers around the world, and the fostering of a prophetic attack on such giant social evils as prejudice, injustice, and war — when we consider the things that have stemmed from this «penniless teacher of Nazareth,» we are dull indeed if the wonder of it does not sweep over our souls.
Attacking theocentrically oriented theologians like Stanley J. Samartha, Ashish Chrispal says that such thinking «moves away from the centrality of Christ and the triune God,» and that Samartha «fails to recognise that the kind of pluralism he and other pluralists propose can make the religions a matter of indifference or can take a form of pious scepticism or people may renounce all religious choices, since they can live equally without them» and goes on to emphasise that
To those atheists who kept on attacking Christianity and Judaism: Without the Christianity factor in the past 2000 years and Judaism in the more than 2000 years, you would not be living in the kind of civilization you are living now.
The opinion was of a kind we are used to seeing by now from Justice Kennedy: long on windy rhetoric about «dignity» and ad hominem attacks on the basic human decency of the law's defenders, and short on actual coherent legal reasoning from recognizable constitutional principles.
One of the themes of the Enlightenment in the 18th century, which still has great influence today, was a kind of «anything but Jesus» attack on religious superstition, and a special distaste for the legacy of the Catholic Church.
In some ways Cage represents an attack on the whole Renaissance conception of self - consciousness, and an adoption of a kind of secular - mystical idea of self as an enemy that must be removed before one can delight in the world for its own sake.
It's the kind of performance that would have left Guus Hiddink wondering how best to nullify the best attacking force on the planet, a team that has now managed an incredible 100 goals in the domestic league season.
It will be a fun game seeing them take on the Steelers, who have a similar sort of attack downfield kind of style.
but more importantly it should tell you that wenger no longer has a grasp on the strengths and weaknesses of his team, or, indeed, what kind of football he is trying to play... heard a lot of people waffling on about the end of tika tak... we never got there because too many first team players lack the skills to do that kind of football... ramsey walcott giroud merteshaker coquelin are not that kind of player... nor do we rapidly convert defence in to attack as we used to or press teams in their own half..
To do that we need a lewandowski kind of striker, someone who can score dead ball goals, someone who can score from nothing, someone who can take - on defenders single - handedly when we are canter - attacking.
Perhaps if you said that our fans suffer from excessive expectations I would have agreed with you but not this kind of veiled attack on Arsenal; in effect actually proving what the writer is saying.
Kind of hard for teams to attack our fullbacks when we have the ball and are pushing them on their back foot.
which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
The Gunners got a taste of life without the kind of dynamic, slashing, attention - grabbing striker Alexis and Aubameyang gives them on Tuesday against Swansea City, and that was a flat, awful performance with no attacking life that ended in a humiliating 3 - 1 defeat.
He was the football coach there, for East Mississippi Junior College, ruling this, his dominion, for most of the»50s and»60s with a passing attack that was a quarter century ahead of its time and a kind of discipline that was on its last legs.
And continue to use that «40mil +1 pnd» for Suarez as some kind of weak azz'd attack on AW's cred.
«With 20 laps to go because I'd already won I was like «should I just attack» but it kind of left me on the back foot.
Let me hope Flamini will manage to do a Fellaini kind of thing.But if we play our game based on counter attacks like we did to spurs then we are as good as any one for top three.But if our injured players come back early especially Diaby, Frimpong, Podolski, Chamberlain and Walcott stays fit then we are contenders for the trophy.
At one point in the second half, Pogba committed an act of expertly audacious daylight robbery, dispossessing a befuddled opponent with a kind of dance - tackle, sweeping the ball away from two disbelieving Southampton players, who were left looking aghast and confused as the Frenchman pirouetted serenely on his way to launch a United attack.
The depth chart, as it stands today, only makes that clear, especially in midfield and attack where there is very little depth of the kind Liverpool will surely need if they are to make a deep run in Europe and hold on to a top four spot in the league.
In any other side with genuine title - winning ambitions he would be a high - class option player or an impact forward to throw on and alter the shape of a contest locked down to his team's usual Plan A: the kind of striker a club like Barcelona could use off the bench but not a target - man they would build their attack around.
Gaffer will go for a more defensive format using a lone strike up front and a crowded mid field that will kind of slow our attack, i wish eboue and song start on the bench because its time to bring out the real Arsenal not trialists.
It's those kind of in - game tactical tweaks that Mourinho will rely on here, being in the best possible shape to both defend and attack against City.
It's kind of like setting up a blocking wall for a free kick, except it's a fluid blocking wall that has to move with the attacking player who's being set up for the shot on goal.
I though that as readers of my articles on MomsTEAM are likely to have an interest in this subject, as I'm sure every one of you has been affected by an overweight relative or friend who is dealing with cancer, heart attack, stroke, and / or diabetes, and want to keep your kids from having those kinds of health problems.
Do Republicans have anything that can match this kind of combined - arms attack on all fronts?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z