Sentences with phrase «kinds of conclusions did»

What kinds of conclusions did you come to?

I don't think enough is understood in this field at this point to draw the kinds of conclusions you did.

Not exact matches

Nevertheless, as the study is the largest and longest study of its kind, more research is likely needed before we reach any definitive conclusions about how well it works — or doesn't.

And it's cool that you kind of came to the same conclusions doing it yourself.

I think with that kind of acceptance, we can listen to each other, learn, even if we don't always get to the same conclusion.

He does not give us the impression that he and I are exactly the kind of people who reach heaven easily, a move too often found at the conclusion of a Mary Oliver poem.

I have tended to do this kind of deconstructive questioning in private, and then write about the positive conclusions I've reached.

But the metaphor does direct us toward a process of inquiry involving certain kinds of practical moral thinking which might lead to such conclusions.

Also contrary to Jones» conclusion is Richard L. Brougham's recent attempt to save Whitehead from this dilemma by accusing Bergson of over-emphasizing continuity while Whitehead's kinder, gentler notion of «simplification» could provide us with a thoughtful and pragmatic account of experience that did nor have to reduce discontinuities to «mere appearances.»

But moral conclusions depend on a kind of reasoning, not merely on «sensibilities» upon which we do not reflect.

I do not believe in this kind of God, yet there is no way to hold Calvinism and avoid these conclusions, except to say «God is God and can do as He wants».

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

I do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th day of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquillity, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted; for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

So in this issue Hanson follows that through to a conclusion coming up with tiny insect - like robots with greater than human level intelligence living by the billions in skyscrapers and sort of doing their virtual work at the equivalent of pennies per day and what this leads to, there are two different ideas about what this kind of economic runaway advancement would ultimately lead to.

Hi, What do you make of De Laat and Maurellis's analysis and their conclusion / speculation that quite a lot of the warming in the temperature record is down to some kind of «local» heating effect?

The basic conclusion is that the concept does work well enough for these kinds of comparisons to be done.

You unfortunately do not know if any claim or conclusion he has made is truthful without outside scholarly referenses, of a type and kind that is unbiased and rigorously tested.

At the end of it all, from my own experience, and reading the boards of what was happening to other people, I have come to these kind of conclusions; For some people, the path of eating heaps does not lead to metabolic healing, all that happens is that they get fat, and then develop a bunch of other complicating problems from the fat gain like, estrogen dominance leptin resistance insulin / blood sugar imbalance issues immobility and whatever else!

But if we go by the conclusions of the article, the fact that the arm and hand get bigger through weightlifting would mean that it didn't evolve for the kind of fine motor control that you produce in the arts.

And the conclusion I've come to is a kind of, well, jealousy, of somebody who wishes they were doing it themselves.

In its colliding genres and general balls - out loopiness it does sometimes lose its footing, but perhaps most impressive is that it does generally follow some kind of insane high - concept chain of cause and effect to its logical, ludicrous conclusion — with plenty of quotable Whedonisms along the way.

But in a subsequent meeting, the staff actually took portions of the MCAS and came to these conclusions: Although the test is hard, it really does measure the kinds of skills and knowledge students need to be successful in the 21st century; because the MCAS is a curriculum - referenced test whose items are released every year, it is possible to align the curriculum and study for the test; and finally, our students have a long way to go, but most can reach proficiency if the whole school teaches effectively over time.

«The naive approach is to look across cohorts and draw some kind of conclusion, but it just doesn't tell us much, other than possibly changes in the composition of who's taking the test from year to year,» Glazerman said.

«I guess we could look at all kids lumped together and kind of draw some conclusions, but again I think the conclusions that are drawn, are not — they don't accurately portray the quality of charter education,.»

This is the kind of story where, when Moe's little brother suddenly goes missing at a cookout, there's absolutely no suspense because it's a foregone conclusion that Ebihara will save the day (and that Moe will do something dumb like fall in a river).

My conclusion was that the kind of work my team does every day, such as cleaning up old ebooks, figuring out how to update the backlist, recovering from our own previous bad practices, is common across the industry.

In short, even if there existed verifiable data from which to do some kind of statistical analysis of «rejection rates,» one could not draw any sound conclusions from that analysis that would be meaningful going forward.

As always, I look forward to any insights my readers might provide, and remind you that I'm not providing any kind of investment advice here: you'll need to do your own analysis and reach your own conclusions regarding the Gleacher liquidation.

I do know these kind of studies typically target a predetermined answer, are commissioned for the sole purpose of arriving at that conclusion, and are often skewed beyond recognition in the process.

The first - of - its - kind study mixed brain - imaging data from canines with a series of behavioral experiments, and came to the conclusion that dogs really do value the relationships they have with their owners.

Conclusion: The basic takeaway point is that anyone doing a significant amount of traveling will likely find uses for both kinds of miles.

Lara realizes she is not the kind of person to break down in the face of that conclusion, instead she steels herself for the challenge at hand, and even scares herself with her ability to do that.»

If you put aside Final Fantasy, you have this three - vs - three battle system and fun - filled matches taking quite a short amount of time — games comes to a conclusion in about 3 and a half minutes — and I don't think there's ever been a game before that worked on that kind of system.

TW: «Yeah, writing the summary before the report kind of lets the cat out of the bag, doesn't it, about how the conclusions come first, the evidence chosen to fit?»

I don't understand it either, but in the end I do know this kind of discussion leads to sound consensus and greater confidence in the conclusions finally agreed

Given the unavoidable fact that most people do not have the training (or the time) to reach an independent conclusion on a scientific matter of this kind, knowing where most of the people who do have the training and who have taken the time come down on the matter is the best guide available on where the public and its policy makers should place their bets.

It's kind of a mystery to me as to why Steve Schneider didn't come to the same conclusion.

«JC conclusion: -LSB-...] This is not the way to do it, and this kind of behavior, particularly from -LSB-...] who is in a position of responsibility at a government lab -LSB-...] will backfire on them.»

Feynman is the kind of person that should be reviewing the IPCC reports (though Im sure he has other time wasters) so we can get a view from a «genuine» scientist about how the work is done and the general rigour of the methods and conclusions.

I do not see what value Steve McIntyre's engineering quality exposition of 2xCO2 Yields 3C Warming would have — nor do I see how it could even be produced — without there being in existence some kind of auditable, tightly - structured inventory of climate science issues, one which includes a subsidiary inventory of the types and quantities of empirical information which would be necessary to prove or disprove the conclusions of said engineering analysis.

However, if you see a completely different species, say an Australian Black Swan Cygnus atratus, on the same lake, then you might come to a different and more rapid conclusion; but in order to do so you have to know one kind of swan from another and broadly speaking, I'm not sure Paul MacRae does, and that is the real problem with taking this book seriously.

This requires a rethinking of what it is the «expert» is really doing for the public — and the best kind of expert is the one who helps you understand how they came to their conclusions, not the one who delivers said conclusions from on high in the ivory tower, with no questions allowed.

# 422 wili: «Does anyone else reading the article — looking at the flat dashed line in figure three and putting that together with the fact that we know there will be other carbon feedbacks — come to my conclusion that this means we are now in a kind of runaway (not the Venusian kind, though)?

In a nutshell, our claim in that du Pont and his colleagues reach counter-intuitive conclusions (for example that the EU has made a more «equitable» pledge than either China or India) by way of a cascading series of decisions that, taken together, skew their approach towards various kinds of grandfathering, while, at the same time, appearing to be derived from a balanced and comprehensive set of high - level equity principles.

I'm kind of interested in what conclusions they did come to at the workshop.

But what some of the other answers say about «yes, refactoring does happen», and «it happens, but its really complicated» kind of leads to this conclusion.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.

There are a ton of online templates for writing different kinds of materials, but they all have a similar approach: Do some research, create the context and flow of your «story» by developing an outline, write the piece, edit, edit and edit it again, ensure you have your attributions and a good conclusion that sums up and reiterates the most important message.

A huge problem, and frankly, I think as we spoke about earlier, this is one of the reasons that so many lawyers draw the conclusion that the internet's not great for client development because they got sold on some kind of web magic voodoo wizard ninjary and when it doesn't work, they can't understand why.

With the very narrow, newly created exception for guilty verdicts in criminal cases reached based upon racial or other kinds of impermissible prejudice rather than the facts of the case (or cases where there is an outside influence on the jury such as a bribe or someone looking up facts or law on the Internet), no one can challenge a jury verdict based upon the reasoning and conclusions actually made by the jurors, even if someone learns that the jury knowingly or accidentally didn't follow the law or was mistaken about the facts.