Sentences with phrase «kinds of creatures in»

Richard Leakey published evidence in 1971 indicating that the Australopithecines were «knucklewalkers» not unlike the living African apes which are long - armed, short - legged knucklewalkers.12 In 1975 a quantitative computerized comparison of the bones of modern apes, Australopithecines and man placed the three kinds of creatures in three separated groups.

Not exact matches

I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?

In this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of God's love, who, in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iIn this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of God's love, who, in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iin creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iin persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iin the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon iin the evil that its human creatures inflict upon it.

Stephen Toulmin echoes these sentiments in an elegant statement on the cosmos understood on the model of our «home»: «We can do our best to build up a conception of the «overall scheme of things» which draws as heavily as it can on the results of scientific study, informed by a genuine piety in all its attitudes toward creatures of other kinds: a piety that goes beyond the consideration of their usefulness to Humanity as instructions for the fulfillment of human ends.

I believe that God works through creatures, especially human ones, that that work is transformative, that we can not know in advance just where such transformation will lead, but that we can distinguish God's transforming work when it occurs from other kinds of changes.

For the saving love of God to be present to human beings it would have to be so in a way different from how it is present to other aspects of the body of the world — in a way in keeping with the peculiar kind of creatures we are, namely, creatures with a special kind of freedom, able to participate self - consciously (as well as be influenced unconsciously) in an evolutionary process.

«I can not conceive of a god who rewards and punishes his creatures or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves.

In virtue of being the kind of thing it is, such a creature is no longer «trapped within history.»

But he became hungry and was desiring to eat; but while they were making preparations, HE FELL INTO A TRANCE; and he saw the sky opened up, and an object like a great sheet coming down, lowered by four corners to the ground, and there were in it all kinds of four - footed animals and crawling creatures of the earth and birds of the air.

i am sorry J.W but i don't believe there is a god of any kind... if there was a god, why would such a so called all powerful being allow for the treatment of its creation by its creation... the argument of free will is an old and tired one... if the existence was true and the laws put in place to honor such a creature were equally upheld by god then i would have been punished a long long time ago and so would have the majority of people... believer or not!

[18:54] We have cited in this Quran every kind of example, but the human being is the most argumentative creature.

His religious difficulty came from the kind of theology he found around him, its habit of identifying words in a book (written by human hands and thought by human brains) with the words of God, also from the habit of playing fast and loose with the dangerously ambiguous concepts of omnipotence and omniscience, and taking these more seriously than any definite affirmation of the freedom of creatures to make decisions that are their own and not God's.

Finally, in the fourth place there is the question of ontology, of just what kind of world it is in which gift without return and the death of the other linked to my own death gives rise to subjectivity and ensures that as subjective beings we are first and foremost ethical creatures — even before we are erotic creatures or curious creatures.

By comparison, the Genesis story boils down to In the beginning... the earth was a formless wasteland... Then God said, «Let the water teem with an abundance of living creatures... God created the great sea monsters and all kinds of swimming creatures with which the water teems and so on.

Is it the kind of power that must be in absolute control of every detail, OR is it the kind of the power that is so wise and powerful, that it can truly give away power to free creatures?

«I can not conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves.

The lesser kinds of reverence have been noted only in order that we may be quite clear that even in Catholic circles the term worship is applied normally to God and none other, although it is important that we understand that by association with God and His presence and work, creatures are seen in the Christian tradition as worthy of something even more remarkable than the respect for personality of which democracy has spoken — they are worthy of reverence which is religious in quality, reverence about which there is a mystery, just as in human personality itself there is a deep mystery by reason of its being grounded in the mystery of God.

so much so that they seek out something without any merit nor even a shredd of evidence and then claim it to be more then truth but the word of god who for all intents and purposes is equal to every other make believe creature in the entire history of man - kind!

In western Europe in the Middle Ages, for example, technology was directly spurred by a belief, namely that there are some kinds of work too degrading for creatures made in the image of God to do.16 The result of this view was a great increase in the invention of laborsaving deviceIn western Europe in the Middle Ages, for example, technology was directly spurred by a belief, namely that there are some kinds of work too degrading for creatures made in the image of God to do.16 The result of this view was a great increase in the invention of laborsaving devicein the Middle Ages, for example, technology was directly spurred by a belief, namely that there are some kinds of work too degrading for creatures made in the image of God to do.16 The result of this view was a great increase in the invention of laborsaving devicein the image of God to do.16 The result of this view was a great increase in the invention of laborsaving devicein the invention of laborsaving devices.

When we humans were primitive thousands of years ago, we survived because nature provided us the basic conditions for life, that is called anthropic environment that until now sustained our existence, We as creatures never affect the environmental balance, but today because of many synthetic products our existence had endangered nature, that awareness developed a kind of concern for us to correct some of what we seemed us environmental abuse, That is the phiysical or material aspect of reality, in the spiritual part of our responsibility we also began to realize the meaninglessness of our existence without God, and for the atheists the reverse, Why do you think is the reason?

Psychology can study the behavior of animals and try to guess what forms of perception, emotion, memory, and perhaps learning or problem solving of simple kinds are going on in these creatures.

Does it not suggest that this is a general law of life; that the living creature, compelled for its own survival to attach itself materially and spiritually to others of its kind, and to an increasing extent as it progresses autonomously and in individual freedom, is automatically prevented by Nature from rising above a given level of emancipation and consciousness?

As a body is an organism made up of many members, and it is held together by one soul, so, in my opinion, the whole world is a kind of huge and immense living creature which is united by one soul, namely the power and reason of God.

The root of Hobgood - Oster's theological problem is that she affirms Letty Russell's comment that «the gospel is situation variable,» which authorizes her to praise mythic portraits of Celtic Christianity and criticize any theologian who ranks God's creatures in some kind of hierarchy.

Even supposing that the problem of mutual relevance of present and future were solved, I doubt this still would allow the kind of freedom process theologians want in creatures.

They are monistic in the sense that any individual or event whatever, whether God or one of God's creatures, is of one kind of reality only, not of two or more kinds.

For instance, even though the Church teaches that only Christ should be worshiped, that Christ is God and Mary is a creature, and that Christ is the only Savior, you can still find some old Catholic women who grew up thinking that Mary is alongside Jesus, perhaps in some kind of equal partnership.

Because the capacity for realizing positive values and the capacity for freedom or self - determination are correlative, rising in proportion with each other, creatures capable of the kinds of values we can enjoy are necessarily creatures with a very dangerous level of freedom.

We simply do not know what creatures may exist elsewhere, and therefore we can not begin even to guess at other kinds of revelation which the Creator may have given, or may plan to give, in other parts of his apparently limitless creation.

I will happily embrace the new Thiery Henri if such a creature exists but if we can not find him, just get me a prolific sharp shooter with a good conversion rate who can play in our kind of system.

In her cartoons, Kirby makes light of all kinds of parenting situations, from Frozen - inspired early wakeup calls, to something she describes as «The Shitty Guilt Fairy,» a mythical creature that hangs around just to make you feel terrible at all your parenting decisions (it's like she knows my life!).

We are so focused on a vision of a particular kind of perfect child that we fail to see the actual creature mucking about in his or her natural habitat.

Based on a favorite department in Nat Geo Kids magazine, this book is overflowing with fascinating facts, silly stats, and catchy little knowledge nuggets in all kinds of cool categories, from astronomy and sea creatures to revolutions and breakfast.

The fossilized remains of the creature — the only example of its kind ever discovered, dubbed Albertonectes vanderveldei — came to light in a gemstone mine in 2007.

In the kids» minds, the world contained only two kinds of sea creatures: Nemo and Education Fish.

A medical doctor (of human patients), Rothschild is often sought out these days by paleontologists for his observations about the diseases revealed in bones (the dinosaur kind)-- and the subsequent deductions about how these long - extinct creatures might have lived.

Perhaps unfairly so, for as photographer Stephen Green - Armytage shows in this weird and wonderful book, the pigeon is not only a creature of grace and beauty but also, to quote the writer T. H. White, «a kind of Quaker..., a dutiful child, a constant lover, and a wise parent.»

As humans put stress on the habitats of more complicated marine creatures, Robison explains, «jellies, because they are relatively simple, cheap to build, and can reproduce very quickly, can respond to negative impacts on other kinds of animals by rushing in to fill their niche.»

The brainiest creatures share a secret — an odd kind of brain cell involved in emotions and empathy that may have accidentally made us conscious

The images in Bee are the kind of machine - made line work Durer himself would've envied, infusing tiny creatures and surfaces with the depth, insight and majesty they deserve.

We are complex creatures, and could not have arisen «just by chance» out of a brew of chemicals, even in some warm little pond of the kind envisaged by Charles Darwin.

It will be in that moment that you lose your status as Awesome Person Who Takes the Kids to the Movies and Buys Them Candy because it is then that you will have to explain to your child that, in real life, Jim Carrey's character would be considered a delusional pet hoarder endangering the lives of creatures that need special care and that the mean zookeeper is the good guy and not some kind of animal prison warden kidnapper.

This is the kind of game on which has nothing to offer, just a 6 hours of shooting in frame dropped world with strange creatures which you will want to end very quickly just to finish it already.

Reuniting disaster - resistant star Dwayne Johnson with his «San Andreas» director, this brainless big - screen monster - smash movie assumes that audiences want to see the Rock stop three enormous mutant creatures from destroying American metropolises, when in fact, it's the gleeful prospect of witnessing just that kind of spectacular CG devastation that gave the game its name — and presumably got the movie made.

Striking nothing but a foot for 30 minutes isn't unheard of when it comes to these kinds of games, but we're seeing things a little on the smaller side with Shrike - an own - like creature similar to the newly added Malfestio in Capcom's legendary series.

When discussing The Shape of Water, del Toro (who is Mexican) has been equally upfront about how its sea creature is a stand - in for «the other,» or the outsider, in any kind of political situation.

One fateful evening, some kind of humanoid aquatic creature arrives for study, hauled in by a nefarious government agent played with controlled gonzo by Michael Shannon.

Although this is the kind of movie that works best the less you know, misfortunate souls that saw another British horror flick this year about an underground dweller, Creep, will probably find the story here quite familiar, especially in the look of the creatures.

And then there's Thomasin Harcourt McKenzie, who gives the kind of breathtakingly confident debut that reminds one of Lawrence in Granik's breakout or Kate Winslet in «Heavenly Creatures.»

In fact, they are emotionless creatures conforming to some kind of hive mentality...