It moulds the scientist's assumptions as to what
kinds of entity there are in the world (Newton was interested in matter in motion) and the methods of enquiry suitable for studying them.
I agree with Kuhn that the scientist does have beliefs about
the kinds of entity there are in the world, and does have ontological commitments (and not merely methodological commitments for the sake of a fruitful research strategy, as Lakatos would have it).
Not exact matches
There are some broad, general changes that will affect every business but to understand how this plan will affect you specifically, you need to know more specifically the
kind of entity you are.
Over and above the «special relevance» which selected eternal objects may have in relation to particular, finite actual
entities, it is necessary that
there be a
kind of «relevance in general,» a real togetherness
of all eternal objects amongst themselves, effected by an eternal, infinite actuality: «Transcendent decision includes God's decision.
I'm agnostic towards the existence
of some
kind of realm beyond the known world but I feel that if
there were a God, that
entity would be so much larger than anything mankind has (or even could) think up.
But we argue with Edward Pols that
there is one other radically different
kind of actual
entity, persons (PS 8:103).
For by (1),
Entity has no alternative to being static and passive (2) and
there must therefore be a
kind of independence
of existence
of Entity on the one hand, and
of accidental qualities on the other.
The «ontological principle» is not only that each
of these
kinds «is» in a distinctively different sense, but that
there is a certain primacy in the sense in which ousia «is» or an actual
entity «is.»
There is no
kind of entity present in man that is not present in animals.
You might be used to thinking
of your student loans as being a singular
entity, but the fact is that
there are many different
kinds of student loans.
And it must be remembered, once Fortress listed these
entities, shareholders actually expected that
kind of (pre-crisis) leverage & hubris at the time — so
there's plenty
of blame to go» round.
(let's hope not) Now the GAO or some relevant
entity needs to push NOAA to give proper attention to these matters, with up - to - date WMO site standards enforced universally (all
kinds of political and management issues
there, I realize).
Although similar centres exist in the US and Canada,
there they are administered and funded by the government, while in this case, the centre is governed by a private sector
entity, making it a first
of its
kind.
These two
kinds of regulation (
entity regulation and compliance - based regulation) are the response to the very common objection to alternative structures that is raised in Canada and the United States, which is: «but
there is no way to regulate them.»
There's no question that doing ediscovery properly from beginning to end throughout a contentious matter involving large
entities isn't free and we know that compared to traditional
kinds of discovery (which can be done in dribs and drabs over the course
of preparation for trial) that using electronic tools and gathering electronically stored information will always involve an upfront cost that is surprising to many and unwanted by all.
There are different
kinds of loan applications depending on the purpose or usage
of the loan that an
entity is applying for.
However,
there are other
kinds of termination letters that are used for reasons that can not be controlled by the people or other
entities involved in a specific transaction.
There are different
kinds of security guard positions that depend on their security assignments, the nature
of the location or
entity they are assigned to, and the specific tasks that they are expected to execute.
Since
there are different
kinds of summer job positions,
there are also different
entities who can use our summer job cover letters.
The absence
of the
kind of democratic goodwill that would be associated with any real CREA general membership involvement was a feature leading up to the vote on the Consent Agreement in St. Johns Nfld and
there is a particular irony to this because the matter involved a Federal Government
entity, namely, the Competition Bureau
of Canada.
Selling relinquished property held in your name as an individual and subsequently acquiring your like -
kind replacement property in your corporation would result in a disallowed 1031 exchange transaction because
there are two entirely different taxpaying
entities involved in the transaction even though you may own 100 %
of the corporation.