Hammons, having visited Zen gardens in Japan a few years prior to the show, knew that «there are so many
kinds of nothingness.»
Not exact matches
God looks onto what seems like a dark canvas
of nothingness and imagines a beautiful life — a tree bearing all
kinds of good fruit that nourishes those who come to eat
of it.
I am no mathematician nor quantum physicist but it does not take a rocket scientist to know that
nothingness holds all mannerisms
of every
kind of matter in its nothing embodiment!
Not only is the mutable world separated from its divine principle — the One — by intervals
of emanation that descend in ever greater alienation from their source, but because the highest truth is the secret identity between the human mind and the One, the labor
of philosophy is one
of escape: all multiplicity, change, particularity, every feature
of the living world, is not only accidental to this formless identity, but a
kind of falsehood, and to recover the truth that dwells within, one must detach oneself from what lies without, including the sundry incidentals
of one's individual existence; truth is oblivion
of the flesh, a pure
nothingness, to attain which one must sacrifice the world.
Human
kind is unable to process the idea
of «
Nothingness» for a reason.
There is a lot
of farcical chin - pulling in the book over various «possible candidates for
nothingness» and «what «nothing» might actually comprise,» along with an earnest insistence that any «definition»
of nothingness must ultimately be «based on empirical evidence» and that ««nothing» is every bit as physical as «something»» — as if «
nothingness» were a highly unusual
kind of stuff that is more difficult to observe or measure than other things are.
You are arguing about «
nothingness» as a proof
of some
kind?
In perishing, occasions are not consigned to total
nothingness but are granted a
kind of «immortality» as elements in the experiences
of subsequent occasions and groupings
of occasions.
This motif, repeated from picture to picture takes a
kind of content that belonged to the original Abstract Expressionist mythos — e. g. the existential
nothingness out
of which the being
of the painting arose — and brings it deftly over into a formal aspect
of the composition itself.
Again, that became a
kind of Zen idea
of time, space and
nothingness.