Sentences with phrase «kinds of questions by»

Male and female entrepreneurs get asked different kinds of questions by VCs.

It's an interesting experience: I react to this kind of question by resting my elbows on the table and saying, «Well, let's talk about that....»

Not exact matches

In response to a shareholder question about what could be done to speed up the glacial pace of adoption of electric car production by other car companies, Musk said he was «playing with doing something fairly significant on this front which would be kind of controversial with respect to Tesla's patents.»

Now that you've got a general idea of what kind of quiz you want to create along with a title to go with it, it's time to bring it to life by filling it up with questions!

«Any argument they make for keeping that in would result in the same kinds of legal challenges presented by Section 3 (c), which poses the question of, «Why have people from these countries been deemed more dangerous than others?»»

There's no question IQ is by far the better determinant of career success, in the sense of predicting what kind of job you will be able to hold.

«The capacity of central bankers to do that, whether they plan to respond by varying some kind of capital requirement or whether they plan to respond by varying interest rates, seems to be to be very much in question,» Summers said.

There are all kinds of questions raised by the documents that need answers, he said.

By Monday, a few angry, constituent - rousing tweets had snowballed into the kind of itemized list of questions that comes with a due date.

Subject to any applicable terms and conditions set forth in Realty Income's Privacy Policy, any communication or other material that you send to Realty Income through the Internet or post on a Realty Income website by electronic mail or otherwise, such as any questions, comments, suggestions or the like, is and will be deemed to be non-confidential and Realty Income shall have no obligation of any kind with respect to such information.

But he added that «there is no question there is going to be all kinds of legal obstruction that will be resorted to by opponents.»

A bad apple will probably be swayed by a breeze and hit the ground faster, but the kind of «bad apple» in question who is practising as REALTOR in B.C., didn't seem to be concerned if they would even hit the ground — let alone how hard they might hit, and that's the problem Marty that seems to be above your level of reasoning.

This tool provides a framework for the kinds of questions you need to ask of a potential customer in order to sell effectively by understanding what they value.

Failure by the State in question to support such a committee — should result in Western sanctions of the severest kind.

But for these debating Catholics, the question is whether the American situation is curable, by some kind of reform program; or incurable, inherently tending to self - destruction.

You're just parroting the kind of standard eighth grade atheist questions that are answered by reading any number of excellent authors.

Later he would say that «those kinds of questions [to starve the afflicted child] can be answered best by the people who are right there on the scene, if they think clearly and act responsibly.»

She continues to question all things spiritual, cares deeply about living a Christ - centered life, and creates all kinds of problems by living out loud; she blames her family for continuing to encourage her.

By looking at my study guide for my new book, Nothing but the Blood of Jesus, you will see what kind of questions are answered in the book.

Just because one religion has managed to insulate itself from any question by the media does not mean we should let that kind of blackmail go any further.

The Utah compromise, and the conference address by Elder Oaks, have led some to think that Latter - Day Saints teaching was about to undergo some kind of evolution on the question of same - sex marriage.

You say you are Christian, and you show it by your action, you are kind when you address others questions, you do not attack, but answer to the best of your ability.

Dr. Polk reconceives the basic question of the relation of power and goodness by asking what kind of power is appropriate to a loving God, rather than the traditional way of framing the issue as how can a powerful God also be a loving God.

So in I Corinthians, having asked how the dead are raised, he attempts to answer the question by saying, on the one hand, that there is some kind of real, though indefinable, continuity between our present bodily mode of existence and the life beyond death, and, on the other, that there is discontinuity also.

In order to make some advance in the obscurity and complexity of the question, and to provide a guiding line for our reflections, a distinction must first be drawn, even though we can not but realize that the two poles of the distinction are linked by manifold connections of the most complicated kind.

So far all this may seem but a metaphysical rendering of the biblical doctrine, but St. Augustine wants to establish his conception of the being of God by answering many questions to which the Platonists have given their kind of answer.

Granted this, however, the panpsychist generalizing in Whiteheadian fashion from the case in question must argue either that both mental and physical properties (Or the two kinds of spatiotemporal extensiveness enjoyed by mental images and physical brains respectively) are real and that all entities have both kinds, or that mental properties are real but physical ones only apparent.

Jon Sobrino has written that as long as there is suffering, poverty, exclusion and premature death on an immense scale — which is ever more the case in Latin America — there will be need for a theology (whatever its name) that poses the kinds of questions posed by liberation theology.

This kind of error might involve the erroneous attribution of an eternal object to CE, but it would not involve incorrect information contributed by CE; thus it is not germane to the question of whether CE itself can involve error.)

Carter then used — more in sorrow than in anger — the perennial resort of the exclusive Club of Presidents: «This is the kind of question that has to be faced by any president when someone leaves the White House.

This inverts the proper relationship between text and interpreter, committing the same kind of blunder as did the schoolboy who was startled out of an illicit slumber by his teacher's question and blurted out that science had indubitably proved all monkeys are descended from Darwin!

Players must answer the question or complete the statement by using white cards printed with answers that have to do primarily with unusual kinds of sex, excrement and bodily fluids, and popular culture.

However, this kind of logic is strongly implied by the opening paragraph of this article, which should bring to question the rationality and value of the thought process of it's author.

One kind of reaction to the question posed is described by two participants in last year's National Institutes of Health panel on fetal transplantation.

At a press event for Perry's newest film Madea's Big Happy Family, which came out on Friday, Perry addressed Spike Lee's criticisms in a most unexpected fashion — by railing at me for a question I was making about a completely different kind of potential backlash.

I am still not sure whether this was one among many examples of his famously weird sense of humour; was he offering an oblique parody of the prevailing Anglican (and secular) view of the Catholic attitude to sexual questions: that the Catholic Church, being run by ignorant celibate clergymen, is intrinsically hostile to all sexual activity, indeed to all sexual feelings of any kind?

And the response by complementarians to these questions as posed in A Year of Biblical Womanhood, with a few exceptions (Mary Kassian has been very kind to engage), has essentially been: «Look at this silly woman who thinks you have to make a sign and literally praise your husband at the city gate!

In this section I intend to illustrate the christological hermeneutic by showing how it bears on scriptural exposition My aim is not to give an exegesis of the texts in question but simply to show the kind of approach I would use in discovering the meaning of Scripture.

Frankly, if you do get offended by it, I would want nothing to do with you, have little respect for you, and I would seriously question what kind of person you were to be so «offended» by an act of kindness and compassion.

The techniques and the «agentic» manner of thought employed by the historical critical method were themselves functions of the kinds of questions asked and the presuppositions shared under the old paradigm.

No, the more basic reason for the challenge is that this very issue of theism or atheism is too complex to admit of the simple either / or kinds of answers apparently called for by the question emblazoned on the cover of Time for Easter 1966.

I'll take you at your word regarding your recommendation to study and suggest you read WHAT GOD DOES TO YOUR BRAIN by two neuroscientists, Andrew Newberg who is a «theist» (believes in some kind of divine character) and Mark Waldman and agnostic (a non commit on the question).

Actually, one does not have to imagine that, for these are precisely the kinds of questions discussed at length by rational choice religion scholars such as Iannaccone, Lawrence Young, Mark Chaves, and others.

I can't tell you how encouraging it has been to learn that I'm not the only one asking these kinds of questions and not the only one deeply troubled by them.

But in another sense the answer is a refusal to give one — or at any rate, it is a refusal to give an answer of the kind presupposed by the question.

They are both intellectual disciplines dealing with the deepest questions of human existence, and when they were being pursued by men of Christian convictions, who were asking the same kind of questions, they were not easy to separate.

They usually take place outside the Divinity School, and they are intended, not for specialists in religious studies of any kind, but for a general audience of people, mainly, but by no means exclusively, undergraduate, whose courses of study may lie in other fields, but who are interested in listening to a non-technical presentation of questions with which theologians are concerned and perhaps also in taking part in discussions which are arranged to follow the lectures.

To say that God prevails in these orders would not provide the kind of answer called for by the question «Does God exist?»

For those who rest easily and uncritically within the uses of language in the Christian community, the kinds of questions posed by the philosophers of language may lead to uneasiness and therefore rejection, or the questions may not even be considered.

True, it tends to ask rather different questions, such as those concerning the understanding of existence implicit in Jesus» teaching, but its work is still based on exactly the same kind of historical - critical methodology as that used by Bultmann or Jeremias.