Sentences with phrase «kinds of questions into»

Increasingly, couples are challenging mainstream culture's fundamental rules about intimate relationships and bringing different kinds of questions into therapy.

This display slung all kind of questions into the public sphere.

Not exact matches

For the 2018 letter, the couple opted to organize their thoughts in the form of frequently asked questions about their priorities, how the current political climate is impacting the organization, how they decide where to donate funds and what kind of thought goes into their corporate partnerships.

As artificial intelligence makes bots more capable, and as companies that use Slack integrate it more and more into their other software systems, he says, «you could ask a bot the kind of question you would ask a really competent chief of staff who had the ability to read every single message in every single channel,» he says.

These kinds of leading questions refocus people's brains on resources, successes, strengths and relationships they can tap into for motivation.»

And then the second question for Sabrina, on the line of credit, and your appetite for buying the stock back here, is there a minimum cash balance or just kind of viewpoint as we look into next year, what your appetite could look like to be buying back stock at the pace you have the last couple of years?

To be fair — and this gets a bit into question # 2 (why are the models systematically wrong)-- no one really knows the timing of how this kind of dynamic plays out in the macroeconomy.

By Monday, a few angry, constituent - rousing tweets had snowballed into the kind of itemized list of questions that comes with a due date.

So many variables should be taken into consideration with this kind of question.

Whether it is changing text books to teach religion as a «science,» making laws that prohibit stem - cell research which would without question help those in need, to stopping of any kind of gay rights, trying to put religion (christianity) into schools, a woman's right to choose, etc, etc...

you can either retreat back into a comfortable unquestioning kind of faith and turn off the question tap altogether.

In fact, as many of these cartoons depict, asking too many questions or the wrong kinds of questions can get you into plenty of difficulty.

Now the question is, what kind of person are you to throw gays under the bus just because you believe doing so will better your chances of getting into Heaven?

Ironically, since the time Wiebe began his crusade the kind of intellectual agenda that worries him most — calling into question the very canons of objective science — has entered the academic scene not through theologians but through postmodern philosophy and radical forms of cultural criticism.

People, I think that arromadazda said it, the whole notion of right and wrong kinds of Christianity is called into question.

And anyway, I think you missed the fact that there are quotation marks around the word «wrong» in the headline, thereby signaling that the whole notion of right or wrong kinds of Christianity is going to be called into question.

But, difficult though it may be, we must enter into the deep places of faith and the soul and ask the hard questions of Christianity with some kind of faith that answers are really there.

In the organic realm, too, a living thing's self - transcendence into another kind, if and to the extent that anything of the sort occurs, a question which does not concern us here, will constitute the new kind as such.

Some kind of interim solution would seem called for if these acts are neither to be simply dismissed (which would call into question how responsible / accountable we really are) nor to deny us our destiny forever.

Both questions lead in the same direction, toward the possibility of a provisional and qualified answer: if the character of happening only once is held to belong to the truth and measure of all things in their very reality, then there is indeed an essence which more than any other satisfies this truth - criterion, and this is the pure essence of time: time taken in itself, or pure movement — movement irrespective of any possible differentiation into the different kinds of movement.

It is clear that hybridity calls into question any talk about some kind of pristine, «original» identity.

Well kids guess what these is no god, what kind of god would allow this to happen to anyone, if you think there is a loving god you been brainwashed into thinking it smart up its not so bad to believe in reality then you want ask yourself idiotic questions you will just know that some a @ # hole did it and you can do something about it instead of praying

The question people should be asking is, «can Gesicki grow into the kind of flexed - out receiver that opposing teams have to double?»

This is the kind of article that highlights exactly what is wrong with this club as a whole... so the question you're asking is what option would be less shitty... after the firestorm surrounding Wenger's contract last season, which somehow led to his highly questionable re-upping for 2 more years, things needed to dramatically change or the inevitable same old, same old was bound to occur... as of right now the bare minimum has occurred... we knew about Sead long before Wenger's renewal so that can't be considered a part of the «new world order»... so the only real changes are Lehman coming into the coaching staff, which could be positive but he's always been a Wenger lackey so the jury is still out, and the acquisition of Lacazette, who I really like as a player but I question the reasoning behind his signing

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The thing is, though, when you line up all of those names and think about who Juve is most likely to sign — and I guess we can throw Can out of the mix right now because we have no clue as to where he wants to go right now — we have another question pop into our head: Are Cristante and Pelegrini the kind of midfielders that can truly make Juventus better?

So I advise every women out there to first question themselves: who they are, what kind of relationship they want, what kind of man they want / don't want, and then put their entire faith into the man who matches their expectations.

Next I started questioning what kinds of mystery chemicals were going into our bodies without us knowing it, thus causing these strange things to happen in our bodies that were designed to make babies and naturally populate the world.

Our plumbing is a little delicate, so I haven't flushed much... that said — I question the idea that it will break down when put in a land fill — no matter what you put into a land fill it won't break down with out some kind of composting process going on — that's why you can find newspapers that look like they came off the presses yesterday in the middle of a 50 year old landfill.

I think that gives the midwives the luxury of having extra time to spend on normal concerns that women have in pregnancy about the correct diet, help with exercise, questions about travel, questions about integrating older siblings into the arrival of a new baby, many kinds of normal things that we really just have the luxury of getting into in a deeper way than physicians may, who are dealing with more medical complications.

ROBIN KAPLAN: That's a really good point and that also kind of leads into my next question too.

When I looked into it further, I found that there was some really helpful medical research that addresses those kinds of questions and that's information that I want to get out there to other parents of excessively crying babies.

Vint Cerf happened to make the issue snap into focus: while answering a question from the audience, he mentioned that he expected today's young people to change their behavior as they age because they'll be maintaining different kinds of relationships then than they do now.

Please, either answer (please do, right now I've only one answer that addresses the question and even that then veers off into territory I said to avoid) or comment in a way that is helpful for answering the question, right now the ratio in the comments of that kind of thing is low.

The prime minister went into a standard denunciation of Labour's economic policies which she said were not «kind» or «fair» to anybody - but the questions about Windrush were far from over as an SNP MP, Lib Dem leader Sir Vince Cable and a furious Yvette Cooper kept up the pressure on her (see below)

Commission members «got snookered into answering a kind of simple yes - or - no question: «Will we be hit by a large earthquake?»»

So above all, if you run into any kind of psychometric testing on your next interview, you'll now know to answer the questions as truthfully as possible and to avoid the temptation to try thinking like your interviewer.

So some of the kinds of questions that look into are, for example, the bigger end of things, questions like, well, would it be possible for us to do something like stop a hurricane or steer it so that it would hit a less vulnerable part of the coast?

The question is: if I go into industry, what kind of work would I have to do to maintain my viability for academic employment?

«This kind of behavior calls into question sugar industry - funded studies as a reliable source of information for public policy making.»

«Now we know what kind of material is getting into the black hole, though exactly how it happens is still another question.»

«The insights provided by this study into some of the biggest questions in human evolution — cognitive evolution and its relationship to the emergence of language — would have been difficult, if not impossible to achieve without the kind of interdisciplinary approach to research that this project was grounded on.»

Now I want to work my way into answering your question, but there's a little bit of, kind of context I want to provide the listeners with so that they understand how this all kind of unravels in the gut, so to speak.

While putting a blussh, there are many such questions ignored, and the result is seen in the form of and over slapped kind of cheeks or often you find the reddening effect mingling into your smile lines.

I don't feel as confident answering fitness, organization or cooking questions as I do a styling or shopping question but I'm kind of loving dipping my toes into covering more topics over here and getting the conversation started on new things!

I'm not going to go into detail about every mini bag that I carry, just kind of want to show you the layout of each one, and if you have any questions about any specific product, feel free to reach out in any manner!

These kinds of questions only perpetuate racial stereotypes (regardless of whether they're «positive» or not) and turn the idea of interracial dating into a kind of experiment or phase.

«I would love for the US government to put money into studying these kinds of questions,» but US granting agencies have typically shunned projects on marriage and relationships, he says.

These questions give you more insight into what kind of person they are.

«Drinking Buddies,» Joe Swanberg's deceivingly jolly, sharply alert romantic comedy, doesn't just pay homage to those confusing unspoken feelings, but engages in that very opaqueness itself, plunging viewers into the same kind of what's - really - going - on - here questions that its young, attractive protagonists are facing.