Ndege focuses on two
kinds of risk analysis.
Not exact matches
To decide a group is crazy all too often lets Political
Risk Analysts off the hook, as such a characterisation implicitly means that
analysis is simply impossible, as the group in question is not sane enough for rational
analysis — the
kind capable
of being studied and assessed — to be made.
In the next decade, molecular research is going to further develop along five lines: predictive medicine, that investigates the genetic conditions predisposing to tumor
risk; early molecular diagnosis; the evaluation
of each patient's prognosis based on his / her genetic profile, in other words, the
analysis of what
kind of mutation affects the DNA
of altered cells; the investigation
of the individual response to drugs, based on our genetic knowledge; «smart drugs», molecules able to hit the target in a selective way, killing only the deprogrammed cells.»
But to cut to the chase - that quote you took cited a meta -
analysis that said in its results at one point that there SEEM to be studies that show diets that include eggs may reduce the
risk of Cardiovascular disease but that's
kind of a misleading statement because a diet that includes eggs could easily be a healthy diet - but it's not necessarily the eggs making it healthy.
But management hasn't provided sufficient info (or insight) for shareholders to perform any
kind of cost - benefit /
risk - reward
analysis of their own regarding this investment.
The Financial Stability Board, which monitors the global financial system, recently said these
kind of risk - scenario
analyses should be a part
of meaningful climate
risk disclosure.
The international Financial Stability Board has set up a task force on climate that has just consulted on how this
kind of sensitivity
analysis could reduce climate
risk.
According to the report's sponsors, this
kind of comparative
analysis is useful for policymakers considering regulatory approaches; public interest organizations concerned about public health and consumer costs; and financial analysts and investors assessing company
risk exposure as global warming emission limits in the U.S. gain more momentum.
This notwithstanding, I wholeheartedly agree with Gavin that these
kinds of probabilistic projections aren't appropriate for
risk analysis and decision making under uncertainty and won't be for a long time.
Any engineering
risk analysis would consider these unacceptable odds, but somehow we have decide it's OK to take these
kinds of risks for our entire society.
This may be because the
kind of analysis I would ideally like to see would probably take a lot
of experts a long time to put together: I would like to see
analysis of an emissions pathway that at least a majority
of scientists would consider prudent (i.e., at a bare minimum avoiding any significant
risk of a «Hell on Earth» scenario within the next X number
of years - 100?
One needs some
kind of threat /
risk analysis: who is likely to want to know either element (contents or fact
of communications), and what resources do they have to find out?
The new edition was written as a
kind of bridge to help move the legal community from the wake - up call
of 2013 — when the first edition was released — to regular and ongoing cybersecurity
risk analysis, Rhodes said.
In order to do this, you will have to do a bit
of analysis and determine what
kinds of financial
risks you are able to take.
The three
kinds of real estate exposure are found to react broadly in the same way to macroeconomic
risk factors although our
analyses suggest that non-listed real estate is more akin to direct real estate than it is to securitized real estate.