Thus the two
kinds of theology need each other, and we may best define their relation by adapting a famous dictum of Kant: «Without believing theology all scientific theology is empty, and without scientific theology all believing theology is blind.»
Not exact matches
But the point is that IN THAT CONTEXT Calvinist
theology was a much -
needed pastoral and communal approach that helped people to break from the shackles
of long - established systems
of spiritual abuse by offering a different story to live by and a different
kind of community to live in.
Jon Sobrino has written that as long as there is suffering, poverty, exclusion and premature death on an immense scale — which is ever more the case in Latin America — there will be
need for a
theology (whatever its name) that poses the
kinds of questions posed by liberation
theology.
Whenever pluralism in
theology resists the
need for argument, warrants, theory, evidence, praxis, it becomes a
kind of Will Rogers pluralism: one where theologians have never met a position they didn't like.
«It says that Mary doesn't
need to be saved,» Evangelical friends with doctorates in
theology from elite universities have told me, which is, you know, and I do hate to say this,
kind of dumb.
Special revelations — the only sort recognized by this
kind of theology — have always
needed to be checked by some more general frame
of reference: the written Scriptures coolly and historically studied, the tradition and common experience
of the church, and the still more general experiences and tested beliefs
of mankind.
Only a sustained collaborative effort
of this sort can hope to produce the
kind of public and communicative
theology needed now.
I do mourn the temptation abroad to attempt ad hoc
theologies when only a sustained collaborative effort can hope to produce the
kind of public and communicative Christian
theology needed.
This is the
kind of «
theology» we
need today.
I hope it has served as a fruitful illustration
of process
theology's quest, in its encounter with the sciences, for the
kinds of values and vision we
need if we are to wrestle with the problems that threaten us with extinction.
But if his thought is to offer any
kind of basis for liberation
theology, a more flexible interpretation will be
needed in which the emergence
of the state will take place in each society in its own tune.
If one accepts the
kind of thinking that even the practice
of theology must begin at the point
of meeting the
needs and anxieties
of man, then perhaps it could well be said that Ralph Nader could function in the context
of a pastor, given that same
kind of concern.
Section II summaries the Whiteheadian
theology of history as an example
of the
kind of overview that is
needed to guide practice in many areas.
In this respect, natural science
needs theology to help keep it open toward the
kind of free and open universe that is its proper object.