Sentences with phrase «km city»

9.0 L / 100 km city for the Fit, 10.5 for the TL.

Even driving it moderately 5 km highway and 5 km city, it does not always make the sound by the time I get to work.

@Paulster2 Convert to an answer and I'll accept it - cleaned the IAC and throttle body, plus reset the ECU today and after driving about 20 km city it looks like the problem has went away.

Fuel economy for the AWD model is rated at 21 mpg in the city and 28 on the highway for a 24.5 combined rating (11.1 L / 100 km city, 8.6 highway, 10 combined), which is pretty much on par with what the Stelvio gets.

Fuel economy is rated at 22 mpg in the city and 28 on the highway for a combined 24 (10.8 L / 100 km city, 8.3 highway, 9.6 combined).

If you don't need the rush of eight, forced - air cylinders, the X5 xDrive35i's diesel, and its 8.7 L / 100 km city and 6.3 highway ratings, comes highly recommend.

The 2015 Golf is fuel efficient with a rating of 7.5 L / 100 km city and 5.5 L / 100 km on the highway with the six - speed DSG automatic transmission.

Fuel economy improves to 15.7 L / 100 km city, 11.2 highway and 13 combined — about par with Ford's 5.0 - litre V8 in its lighter, aluminum body F - 150 Crew Cab.

This truck is rated at 14.1 L / 100 km on the highway and 16.2 L / 100 km city — overall, I consumed an average of 15.9 L / 100 km.

So far have averaged 9.5 L / 100 km city and highway, this is much better than my 2004 pilot and 2011 MDX ever got!

Horsepower increases to 284 (up 24) and torque climbs to 259 pound feet while fuel consumption falls to 12.1 L / 100 km city, 8.9 highway and 10.7 combined.

Official fuel numbers for AWC - equipped vehicles is 9.6 L / 100 km city, 7.7 highway.

It doesn't sound like a big deal, but a common perk with diesel engines is their abundance of torque; the 2.0 in the Cruze puts out an impressive 264 lb - ft of grunt, for example, while still managing a fuel consumption of just 7.5 L / 100 km city and 4.2 L / 100 km highway, making the diesel the most efficient Cruze in the entire lineup.

We got about 8.2 L / 100 km city, 5.4 L / 100 km highway with the stickshift.

But for an extra $ 1,600 over the LT, the Eco manages an estimated fuel consumption of 7.2 L / 100 km city and 4.6 L / 100 km highway.

Despite that extra oomph, the 1.4's fuel consumption estimates are actually better than the non-turbocharged — and bigger — 1.8 - litre engine, delivering an estimated 7.8 L / 100 km city and 5.2 L / 100 km highway when equipped with the manual transmission.

Officially, it's rated at 16.2 L / 100 km city and 11.4 highway.

torque Transmission Lineartronic CVT Brakes Four - wheel disc with ABS Tires 17 - inch alloys Price (base / as tested) $ 28,995 Destination charge $ 1,595 Natural Resources Canada fuel economy (L / 100 km) 7.7 L / 100 km city, 5.4 highway Standard features Rear - view camera, heated front seats, 10 way power driver's seat, active torque vectoring, heated side mirrors and more.

The HR - V equipped with Honda's Real Time AWD system achieves fuel economy estimates of 8.8 L / 100 km city, 7.2 highway, and 8.1 combined.

Its 7.9 L / 100 km city and 6.1 highway fuel economy estimates match the Civic's numbers, but we preferred the Corolla CVT over the Civic.

Official fuel numbers are 11.4 L / 100 km city, 7.7 L highway, though in a cold week of mixed driving, I averaged around 13.4 L / 100 km, and never got lower than 10.3 on the highway.

Officially our numbers are 10.4 / 7.4 / 9.1 L / 100 km city / highway / overall.

Plus the A4's 10.9 L / 100 km city and 7.2 highway estimates handily beat the 200's respective 12.8 and 8.1 fuel economy numbers.

Fuel economy shouldn't be too much of a concern as well, with a city rating of 12.9 L / 100 km city and 9.8 highway, for a combined rating of 11.5 L / 100 km.

2018 Natural Resources Canada estimated fuel consumption for the plug - in hybrid GLC 350e is X.X/X.X Lₑ / 100 km city / highway.

Fuel economy (8.8 L / 100 km city, 7.3 highway) is also quite good for this small performer.

Thus equipped, combined fuel consumption is reduced by 3.0 % (the 2015 numbers of 8.5 L / 100 km city and 6.4 highway look higher than last year's, but that's because of the tougher 5 - cycle test procedure introduced for 2015.)

Fuel rating on the 1.5 - litre is 7.6 / 5.5 / 6.7 / 100 km city / highway / combined.

Fuel Economy: According to the EPA, the 2007 4 - cylinder Mazda 6 sedan is rated at 21/28 mpg or 11.2 / 8.4 L / 100 km city / highway, which means you can get roughly 414 miles or 660 km to a tank.

In Canada, the 2013 C - MAX Hybrid was given the same fuel economy rating (4.0 L / 100 km city / 4.1 L / 00 km highway) as the Fusion Hybrid, under a Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) provision allowing grouping by family.

Fuel Economy: The EPA rates the 2000 Camry with a 4 - cylinder engine and an automatic transmission at 20/28 mpg or 11.8 / 8.4 L / 100 km city / highway, which means you can travel approximately 382 miles (614 km) on one 18.5 - gallon (70 liter) tank with a mix of 55 percent city and 45 percent highway use.

I bought petrol car in 2015 and I am impressed with mileage 22 km highway and 17 km city.

Natural Resources Canada figures for the range of Can - rado run from 11.9 - 13.5 L / 100 km city, 8.8 - 9.8 highway, 10.5 - 11.8 combined.

The Acadia, which comes standard with a 2.5 - litre engine, is estimated to return 8.4 L / 100 km highway for FWD models; and 10.7 L / 100 km city, thanks in part to stop - start technology, a first for GMC.

Fuel consumption meanwhile is rated for 8.8 / 6.9 L / 100 km city / highway with the manual transmission and I averaged a combined 8.0 L with absolutely no efforts made towards economy.

Plus, you should save additional money at the pump, with Range Rover claiming the Td6 burns through just 10.5 L / 100 km city and 8.0 highway.

The fuel economy ranges from 7.1 liters per 100 km highway to 10.7 l / 100 km city.

No fuel consumption numbers to report on this first drive; Honda says 7.5 l / 100 km city and 5.6 highway VVUZZ Recommended: Another excellent all around car from Honda — and it's made in Canada, too

The fuel economy rating (according to Kia) is 11.1 L / 100 km city and 8.2 L / 100 km highway.

(GM estimates the 2.0 T will net about 10.7 L / 100 km city and 7.4 L / 100 km highway.)

Despite a four - inch stretch to its wheelbase, the Malibu has dropped some 136 kg (300 lbs) off of its curb weight, helping the base model achieve estimated fuel economy numbers around the 8.7 L / 100 km city and 6.4 L / 100 km highway mark.

Fuel economy is officially rated at 14.9 L / 100 km city and 9.7 highway.

Fuel economy here lands at just 11.7 L / 100 km city and 8.6 L / 100 km highway.

Fuel Economy: The 2003 Nissan Maxima with an automatic transmission is rated at 17/24 mpg or 13.8 / 9.8 L / 100 km city / highway, which is below average for a family sedan.

Combined with a powerful storage battery, a continuously variable transmission and a sophisticated power management system, the RX 450h offers 308 net hp while at the same time delivering impressive fuel consumption figures of 7.5 / 8.4 / 7.9 L / 100 km city / highway / combined.

BODY STYLE: Mid-size Premium Luxury Sedan DRIVE METHOD: Front - engine, All - wheel drive ENGINE: 3.0 L twin - turbo V6 Power: 400 hp @ 6400 rpm; Torque: 350 lb - ft @ 1600 — 5200 rpm TRANSMISSION: 7 - speed automatic CARGO CAPACITY: 382 L FUEL ECONOMY: (Premium) 12.5 / 9.3 / 11.1 L / 100 km city / highway / combined.

BODY STYLE: compact sport crossover DRIVE METHOD: front - engine, front - / all - wheel - drive ENGINE: 1.6 - litre DOHC direct - injected and turbocharged inline four cylinder (188 hp and 177 lb / ft of torque); six - speed manual or CVT FUEL ECONOMY: (Premium): SV FWD manual, 8.4 / 6.9 / 7.7 L / 100 km city / highway / combined; SV FWD CVT, 8.5 / 6.9 / 7.9 L / 100 km; SL AWD CVT, 8.8 / 7.5 / 8.2 L / 100 km.

If you choose the all - wheel drive model, the fuel consumption jumps to 13.5 L / 100 km city and 9.2 L / 100 km highway.