Sentences with phrase «km city for»

9.0 L / 100 km city for the Fit, 10.5 for the TL.

Not exact matches

What's easy about getting into your car... heading back inside because you forgot your gate key... getting back into the car... adjusting EVERYTHING because your husband drove last... avoiding mass duck / chicken populations on the drive down the driveway... heading out the gate, driving 50 km to the city... taking the dogs for a walk for at least 30 minutes in the city because you can't leave them at home because they eat the furniture... leave the dogs in the car HOPING that you walked them enough so they don't eat the car.

Yay: - Efficient use of space makes it roomy up front and the best 3rd row option for its size - Economy on both purchase price and gas (we averaged 10.3 L / 100 km in the city)- fairly peppy for a 4 cylinder

In the city this vehicle sucks the gas — we never did much better than around 16L / 100 km and for me this is damn close to a deal breaker.

Other nearby airports include Albany International Airport approximately 85 miles (137 km) north and the three major metropolitan airports for New York City: John F. Kennedy International Airport approximately 88 miles (142 km) south, Newark Liberty International Airport approximately 88 miles (142 km) south, and LaGuardia Airport approximately 80 miles (130 km) south.

It is part of the Fuji - Hakone - Izu National Park and is less than 100 km from Tokyo, thereby providing a popular weekend destination for city residents keen to escape the frenzy of the capital.

The ride is for 5.7 kms and has views across the city, sea and mountains.

A private military organization known as Multi-National United (MNU for short) is tasked with forcibly moving the aliens to another camp 250 km outside of the city.

The MKZ's powertrain configuration provides decent fuel economy, with Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27 mpg city / highway (12 - 9 L / 100 km) for the front - wheel - drive version and 18/26 mpg city / highway (13 - 9 L / 100 km) for AWD models.

Was in Germany, Europapark, high speed highway blasts and aggressive accelerations, queues and pick hour crawl through city traffic, 9.3 liters per 100 km, not bad for NA 3.4 boxer - six, imho.

This reduces the load on the engine and makes for fuel savings of around 0.15 litres per 100 kilometres according to the NEDC standard, and up to 0.2 litres per 100 km in city traffic with its frequent overrun and braking phases.

Fuel economy for the AWD model is rated at 21 mpg in the city and 28 on the highway for a 24.5 combined rating (11.1 L / 100 km city, 8.6 highway, 10 combined), which is pretty much on par with what the Stelvio gets.

In that setting, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio manages an efficient 22 mpg in the city, 28 on the highway and 24 mpg combined (10.8 / 8.3 / 9.6 L / 100 km), which is respectable for the segment.

Fuel economy is rated at 22 mpg in the city and 28 on the highway for a combined 24 (10.8 L / 100 km city, 8.3 highway, 9.6 combined).

The energy consumption was rated at 40 kWh / 100 miles for combined city / highway driving, corresponding to a fuel economy of 84 miles per gallon gasoline equivalent - MPGe -(2.8 L / 100 km; 101 mpg imp).

They should be here in two years, which we can be precise about because Mercedes is counting on them for their Mercedes S - type plug in, to get them up to 50 km on the NEDC and comply with Chinese regulations for zero emission city cars.

As I said, I spent my first week flitting about the city without troubling the spark plugs at all and, even with the gas engine working as a Bunsen burner, my 300 - km - plus of sub-zero commuting required just 2.7 litres of gasoline for every 100 kilometres of urban crawl, ironically just about the same as I averaged in the first - generation Volt.

of torque @ 4,400 rpm Transmission Five - speed manual (four - speed automatic optional) Brakes Front - wheel discs with four - wheel ABS Tires P185 / 60R15 Price: base / as tested $ 9,995 / $ 16,733 Destination charge $ 1,400 Natural Resources Canada fuel economy L / 100 km 8.8 city, 6.6 highway Standard features 15 - inch steel wheels with wheel covers, 60/40 split folding rear seat, AM / FM / CD audio system with auxiliary input jack and four speakers, trip computer, rear wiper, tilt steering column, rear window defroster, four - way manual driver's seat, cloth seats, speed - sensitive volume Options Cruise control, air conditioning, Bluetooth, reverse camera, keyless entry, fog lights, power windows, power door locks, cargo cover, arm rest for driver, 4.3 - inch colour display, USB / iPod connection, and more

I live and drive mostly in a city and can get as high as 16.7 km / l per tank - For a smallish car, the rear legroom is generous - Finishing is superior, even to the marque 3 - series

Of course, there's always a price for luxury, and besides the minor sticker shock, you might want to reevaluate your driving habits when you consider the fuel economy; at an estimated 12.5 L / 100 km in the city, and a more respectable 8.9 L on the highway, you'll start feeling guilty if you use the Sienna for short errands around town.

The penalty for the added performance is heavy at 2.3 litres per 100 kilometres in the city over the four - cylinder engine; however, on the highway the difference becomes insignificant — 0.3 L / 100 km.

For 2009, the United States Environmental Protection Agency fuel economy was increased to 24 mpg ‑ US (9.8 L / 100 km; 29 mpg ‑ imp) city / 34 mpg ‑ US (6.9 L / 100 km; 41 mpg ‑ imp) highway with automatic transmission, and 26 mpg ‑ US (9.0 L / 100 km; 31 mpg ‑ imp) city / 37 mpg ‑ US (6.4 L / 100 km; 44 mpg ‑ imp) highway with manual transmission.

The EnerGuide fuel economy rating for the Laramie's Hemi is 17.2 L / 100 km in the city, 12.7 L / 100 km on the highway, while the EcoDiesel claims 12.1 L and 8.8 L, respectively; note that the diesel claims better city fuel economy than the Hemi does on the highway.

It doesn't sound like a big deal, but a common perk with diesel engines is their abundance of torque; the 2.0 in the Cruze puts out an impressive 264 lb - ft of grunt, for example, while still managing a fuel consumption of just 7.5 L / 100 km city and 4.2 L / 100 km highway, making the diesel the most efficient Cruze in the entire lineup.

Other gasoline - only powered Civic sedans and coupes get 39 mpg ‑ US (6.0 L / 100 km; 47 mpg ‑ imp) in highway tests, an improvement of 3 mpg ‑ US (3.6 mpg ‑ imp) over previous generation, and 28 mpg ‑ US (8.4 L / 100 km; 34 mpg ‑ imp) for city driving.

Realistically, that's rather hard to attain and we had to settle for something between 7 - 7.5 l / 100 km combined, but we drove the T - Roc mostly outside the city, away from rush hour city traffic.

Fuel efficiency is similar for both cars, ranging from 14 - 16 km / l in the city and going all the way to 19 km / l on the highways.

The estimated fuel consumption for the 2.0 T model is 22 mpg (10.6 l / 100 km) in the city and 32 mpg (7.3 l / 100 km) on the highway.

After traveling around 400 kilometers in the city, on the motorway, and on off - road trails, the trip computer stabilized at 6.6 liters / 100 km, a decent value for an all - wheel - drive car of this size.

More importantly for city driving the Asterion has a pure electric range of 50 km, putting it top of the class for hybrid super sports cars.

The first mass production PHEV available in the U.S. market, the 2011 Chevrolet Volt, with an EPA rated all - electric range of 35 miles (56 km), and an additional gasoline - only extended range of 344 miles (554 km) has an EPA combined city / highway fuel economy of 93 MPG - e in all - electric mode, and 37 mpg ‑ US (6.4 L / 100 km; 44 mpg ‑ imp) in gasoline - only mode, for an overall combined gas - electric fuel economy rating of 60 mpg ‑ US (3.9 L / 100 km; 72 mpg ‑ imp) equivalent (MPG - e).

Official fuel ratings for this vehicle with AWD are 10.7 L / 100 km in the city and 8.3 L / 100 km on the highway; on our drive, we averaged around 9.0 L / 100 km.

It may seem a tad underpowered, but the benefit is stellar fuel economy (with AWD, the CR - V is rated at 9.1 L / 100 km in the city, 7.2 on the highway for a combined rating of 8.3).

Fuel economy shouldn't be too much of a concern as well, with a city rating of 12.9 L / 100 km city and 9.8 highway, for a combined rating of 11.5 L / 100 km.

2018 Natural Resources Canada estimated fuel consumption for the plug - in hybrid GLC 350e is X.X/X.X Lₑ / 100 km city / highway.

Fuel economy (8.8 L / 100 km city, 7.3 highway) is also quite good for this small performer.

12.9 L / 100 km (22 mpg) city and 8.4 L / 100 km (34 mpg) highway fuel consumption ratings for 2017 Chrysler Pacifica with 3.6 L Pentastar ™ VVT V6 engine and 9 - speed automatic transmission.

With 55 % city, 45 % highway, you can drive the Sentra for 404 miles (650 km) on a 13.2 - gallon (50L) tank.

Thus equipped, combined fuel consumption is reduced by 3.0 % (the 2015 numbers of 8.5 L / 100 km city and 6.4 highway look higher than last year's, but that's because of the tougher 5 - cycle test procedure introduced for 2015.)

The Mazda6 equipped with i - ELOOP rates 8.5 L / 100 km in the city and 5.9 L / 100 km on the highway — impressive numbers for a midsize sedan, and about 3.5 % more fuel - frugal than the regular car.

Also interesting to note that the CVT scores fairly significantly better on the Transport Canada fuel - economy scale, achieving city / highway numbers of 7.0 / 5.9 L / 100 km versus 8.1 / 6.6 for the stick shift.

The 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid (earlier post) is EPA - rated at 46 mpg (5.11 l / 100 km) combined, 47 mpg city and 46 mpg highway; the powertrain shares the transmission architecture with the 2016 Chevrolet Volt extended range electric vehicle (EREV), but includes changes to optimize the system for engine - driven charge - sustaining operation in the range of conditions represented by the US EPA 5 cycle fuel economy tests.

Le / 100 km is an equivalent measure of gasoline fuel consumption for electric energy consumed by Plug - in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) operating in electric mode during city driving.

Manufacturer - estimated ratings of 25 mpg city / 33 mpg highway / 28 mpg combined (9.4, 7.1 and 8.4 l / 100 lm, respectively) for the Outback 2.5 i model are up from 24/30/26 (9.8, 7.8 and 9.0 l / 100 km, respectively) in the 2014 model — a 7.7 % improvement in the combined figure.

-- Top speed: 130 mph / 210 km / h (250 km / h / 155 mph with Sport Line or M Sport)-- Preliminary EPA Mileage Estimates (mpg)-- 23 city / 35 highway / 27 combined for the 8 - speed sport automatic.

GM estimated fuel economy for the CTS with Twin - Turbo is 17 mpg city (13.8 l / 100 km) and 25 mpg highway (9.4 l / 100 km).

Fuel economy is rated at 26 mpg highway / 20 mpg city and 22 mpg combined for the 2WD model (9.0, 11.8 and 10.7 l / 100 km, respectively) and 25 mpg highway / 19 mpg city and 21 mpg combined for the 4WD model (9.4, 12.4 and 11.2 l / 100 km).

The 2015 CR - V features increased EPA fuel economy ratings of 27/34/29 mpg (8.7 / 6.9 / 8.1 l / 100 km)(city / highway / combined) for front - wheel - drive models and 26/33/28 mpg (9.0 / 7.1 / 8.4 l / 100 km) for Real Time AWD models, both increasing +4 / +3 / +3 mpg over 2014 models — i.e., an increase in the combined rating of 11.5 % and 12 %, respectively, compared to the 2014 models.

The official fuel economy rating is 11.8 L / 100 km in the city and 9.2 L / 100 km on the highway, and those numbers get close to 1.0 L / 100 km less for both city and highway in the 2.5 - litre version.

You don't get the same get - up - and - go as the 2.7, but there's still power enough here to keep you comfortably at highway speeds, with better fuel economy to boot (Ford claims 13.6 and 9.8 L / 100 km for the Sport in city and highway conditions respectively, and 11.8 / 8.4 for the Titanium with the 2.0).