Sentences with phrase «km claimed figure»
That said, it was nowhere near the 5.8 L / 100 km claimed figure.
https://www.motoring.com.au/ Not exact matches
Despite this incredibly high specific output (166bhp per litre) and a 0 - 62mph time of 5.9 seconds, the RCZ R is actually the most efficient model in the petrol RCZ line - up, with impressive claimed figures of 44.8 mpg on the combined cycle and 145g / km of CO2 emissions.
Its green figures are impressive, with a claimed 53.3 mpg and CO2 emissions of 124g / km.
MPG and running costs > Audi claims a combined fuel economy figure of 40.4 mpg and 162g / km of CO2 for the S - tronic.
It's claimed to shove the 1324 kg hatch to 62mph in 8.3 - seconds and onto 134mph all while generating on official CO2 figure of 116g / km.
Hot hatch - like claimed figures of 34.4 mpg / 194g / km of CO2 (Carrera) and 32.4 mpg / 205g / km (Carrera S) are hard to ignore, though.
Fiat claims a combined fuel consumption figure of 74.3 mpg and CO2 of 90g / km for the 84bhp TwinAir, while the more powerful two - pot manages 67.3 mpg.
The new technology endows the Spyder with spectacular performance and Green Party pleasing efficiency; claimed figures of 94mpg and 70g / km of CO2 emissions mix with a target lap of the Nurburgring Nordschleife in less than 7 min 30 sec, a 198mph top speed and a 0 - 62mph time of 3.2 sec.
Considering the size and performance on offer, Mercedes has done well to achieve the claimed 23.7 mpg and 279g / km figures, claiming it to be the world's most efficient V12.
The unit also boasts stop / start, which along with the new ZF eight - speed automatic gearbox, contributes to claimed figures of 52.3 mpg and 149g / km.
The diesel claims an economy figure of 67mpg and CO2 emissions of 110g / km, resulting in a tax bill of just # 20 a year and a 20 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company car buyers.
It can't match the PHEV on paper, but its claimed fuel consumption of 53.3 mpg is pretty good for an SUV this size, although its 139g / km CO2 emissions figure still means a relatively pricey 29 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.
That makes them not only the most powerful Audis this side of the new R8 V10 Plus, but also the quickest, with a claimed 0 - 100 km / h figure two - tenths quicker than the models they replace, at 3.7 seconds.
Previously claiming a fuel consumption figure of 5.9 litres / 100 km, the 318i is now good for 5.1 litres / 100 km.
The 237bhp diesel, badged 25d, brings a disappointingly large drop in claimed fuel economy figures, only managing 53.3 mpg combined as a rear - wheel drive car and emitting 129g / km.
Alfa have not yet released the full figures, however the Giulia QV is claimed to sprint from 0 - 100 km / h in 3.9 seconds — beating both the M3 and C63 AMG in this regard.
Honda claims fuel efficiency figures of 19.5 km / l, 19 km / l, 27.8 km / l and 23.8 km / l for the petrol manual, petrol automatic, diesel manual and diesel automatic trims respectively.
The fuel - economy claims also match that outlandishness, and it's well worth sniggering at the 3.0 L / 100 km NEDC figure rather than planning your fuel stops around it.
[18] Perodua claims ECE fuel consumption figures of 21.7 km / l for the manual variant and 21.0 km / l with the automatic, while the auto - only Advance variant is capable of 22.0 km / l, courtesy of the new Eco Idle stop - start system and regenerative braking.
Suzuki claims that the Vitara S - Turbo should achieve a fuel economy figure of 6.2 L / 100 km and our real - life figure was refreshingly close to that at 6.9 L with a mixture of urban and freeway driving.
Its party piece is claimed economy; even in the higher - output form the Ingenium sips only 5.1 L / 100 km, according to the ADR combined - cycle test; not bad for a 1664 kg (kerb) five - door SUV... and there's no doubting the nine - speed automatic also assists in achieving the headline consumption figure.
After 100 kilometres in mostly stop / start traffic the figure of 21.0 L / 100 km is alarming, so much so that I endeavour to drive gingerly in an effort to reach the claimed figures by the end of the week.
[18] Perodua claims ECE fuel consumption figures of 22.8 km / l for the manual variant and 21.3 km / l with the automatic, both exhibiting a 1.2 km / l improvement over the old 1KR - DE.
Toyota claims figures of 68.9 mpg and 95g / km of CO2 — 3.2 mpg and 4g / km better than before.
That's far from the claimed 5.8 l / 100 km (40.5 mpg US), and if you drive it hard (like test cars are usually driven) the board computer starts to display higher figures.
The company claims an ADR Combined fuel economy figure of 6.5 L / 100 km on the rolling road.
The ARAI - claimed figure is 15.17 km / l.
No performance figures have been revealed, but Land Rover claims that it's capable of delivering up to 42.8 mpg, with CO2 emissions of 175g / km.
It delivers a claimed combined fuel economy figure of 43.5 mpg with a CO2 output of 171g / km but will still propel the newly lightened Discovery to 60mph from rest in a brisk 8.0 sec.
The sports activity vehicle is equipped with a 2.0 litre four - cylinder BMW TwinPower Turbo engine, offering 184 hp and 270 Nm for output numbers, and performance figures include a 0 - 100 km / h time of 8.6 seconds and a claimed fuel consumption of 7.5 l per 100 km.
It does, however slurp fuel, with the recorded test figure showing 9.1 L / 100 km, some 1.8 over the claim.
The version of the XE we tested had a claimed combined economy figure of 4.2 l / 100 km, but in mixed conditions we were very far off that mark.
We'll also have to wait for running cost figures for the 1.6 - litre TDI, but the 2.0 - litre TDI 4MOTION claims 55.4 mpg with 133g / km CO2.
It posts claimed figures of 72.4 mpg and 103g / km, while the non-ecoFLEX version has figures of 70.6 mpg and 105g / km /
The manufacturer claims an ADR combined - cycle fuel consumption figure of 6.3 L / 100 km with CO2 emissions of 165g / km.
Coupled with a nine - speed automatic that shuffles drive to all four wheels, the S 63 claims a 0 - 100 km / h time of just 3.5 seconds, a top speed of 250km / h and a claimed fuel consumption figure of 9.3 L / 100 km combined.
Audi claims a combined cycle figure of 1.7 L / 100 km and an all - electric range of 56 km.
Auto idle - stop is standard and Honda claims an ECE Combined fuel economy figure of 10L / 100 km for the NSX.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the claimed figure is 14.2 km / l but we managed to extract 5 - 6 km / l under hard driving and 8 - 9 km / l under relaxed driving.
In fact, at a claimed 5.9 L / 100 km the Astra is pretty competitive with all but the diesel - engined 308 wagon; same with the 137g / km CO2 figure.
Porsche claims that these output figures help the car in accelerating from 0 to 100 km / h in just 4.9 seconds, before hitting a top speed of 275 km / h.
Expect the claimed figures to read 4.1 seconds for the 0 - 100 km / h dash, despite a somewhat lardy 1540 kg kerb weight.
Thanks to the smaller engine, the claimed fuel efficiency figure has gone up to 19.20 km / l.
Bentley has yet to release any power or performance figures for the new model, but claims CO2 emissions of 75g / km, while an official range of 31 miles on electric power only is claimed, as measured under New European Driving Cycle tests.
Sure, since it has cylinder deactivation you can get close to the manufacturer claimed highway figure (9.6 l / 100 km) if you're careful, but even so the figure you get is still higher - at a constant speed of 105 km / h, its trip computer showed a current consumption figure of 12.0 l / 100 km on level ground.
We've reviewed it separately and business users will love the 9 % BiK bracket that its 38g / km official emissions enable, but real - world use away from city traffic is likely to return a fuel - efficiency figure some way short of its claimed 166mpg.
The 79bhp 1.2 - litre engine returns a claimed average of 57.mpg and emits 115g / km of CO2, while the high - power engine actually returns better fuel economy figures, of 68.9 mpg and 95g / km of CO2.
The most economical version, the two - wheel - drive 148bhp, 317 lb ft eD4 - equipped with a manual transmision, will deliver a claimed 68mpg and 109g / km, according to the manufacturer's estimated figures.
Toyota claims the Corolla Hybrid will return a fuel efficiency figure of almost 23 km / l.
While AMG has yet to cite weight data for each model, the Coupe claims an NEDC fuel - consumption combined figure of 9.5 litres / 100 km (or 217 grams / km of CO2), while the Cabriolet drinks 9.8 litres / 100 km (223 grams / km).