Sentences with phrase «km for»

IRIS sought to enforce a non-compete provision within its contractual agreement with Dr. Park that prohibited competition within 5 km for a period of 3 years.

The target originally proposed by the European Commission was a maximum of 120g CO2 / km for an average car, by 2010.

Placed every 2 sq km for one month at each site, the traps documented animals from 2008 to 2010.

If I understand correctly, the Volt will take me 60 km for about 8 kw - hours of energy.

The three channels use the same frequency but different carbon dioxide cell pressure, the corresponding weighting functions peaks at 29 km for channel1, 37 km for channel2 and 45 km for channel3.

Try typing volume of Earth's ice to google and see if you don't get 170,000 cubic km for glacier volume.

How can such 10 - year averages for Arctic Ice sit in the range 5.8 - 5.0 M sq km for averages using 1980 - 2006 with 2007 just sub 5 M?

Reasoning that the total energy remains constant, he differentiates the equation and uses the result to calculate the correct adiabatic lapse rate which is about 9.8 K / km (Kelvin per kilometer) for dry air and about 6.5 K / km for moist air.

There is a theoretical limit which is around 1000 km for the storms outer dimension.

The following values tell the share of absorption in a top layer of several thicknesses from 1µm to 1 km for sun at zenith.

MASIE products include an ASCII text file of sea ice extent values in square km for each Arctic region, time series plots, and image files that visually show where the sea ice is.

We mandate no more than 110g / km for personal road - registered motor vehicles (with offsets for biofuels) with serious progressively escalating per km charges for vehicles not achieving this and place a tax on locally used crude oil and coal reflecting at least $ 40 per tonne of CO2.

That's more than double the total CO2 from driving the Prius around for 16000 km for 10 years.

At 17 km for a tropical atmosphere the amount of water vapor in a given volume is less than 1 % as much as the amount of CO2.

paper that seems to have had such an effect on Joules Verne, some numbers might be useful: h = kb * T / (m * g) = 9.08 km for N2 at 300K λ = 68nm at 101325 Pa To get λ ~ 0.01 h where the deviation from the Fourier Law is ~ 10 % requires a reduction of pressure of 11 orders of magnitude to ~ 1E - 6Pa or an increase of g of a similar magnitude or some combination of both that increases λ and reduces h. I'm not going to touch the temperature gradient as that's even worse.

The only volume expansion in this case is by changing vertically So the formula — g / Cp = -9.8 K / km for dry air would need amending.

And, more importantly, regularly out across the Arctic Ocean for 1200 km for most of the Arctic.

On average, the ozone measurement bias achieved by NDACC lidars is around 5 - 10 % below 20 km for instruments without Raman channels and 5 % for instruments with Raman channels, around 2 % at altitudes within 20 - 35 km, and around 5 - 10 % at altitudes above 40 km [Keckhut et al., 2004].

As shown in Figure 2, Manabe et al. adopted a fixed lapse rate of 6.5 K / km for a convective adjustment in 1D radiative - convective model (RCM) study [Manabe et al., 1964 / 67].

In addition the extra humidity reduces the environmental lapse rate (9.8 C / km for dry to 4.5 C / km fro saturated) which reduces the greenhouse effect of CO2 to below pre-industrial levels.

The higher you go the colder, namely 10 C / km for dry air (the Dry Adiabatic Lapse Rate or DALR) all the way down to 5 C / km for saturated air (the Moist Adiabatic Lapse Rate or MALR) when very warm.

The higher resolution was particularly helpful in mountainous areas since the models take an average of the altitude in the grid (25 square km for high resolution, 200 square km for low resolution).

The figures he uses are calculated from mileage and fuel energy content for IC engined cars, so 80 kWh per 100 km for average UK car.

I'm struggling to get an unequivacol number for kWh / km for electric cars too.

Directions by train: The nearests train stop is in Caldas da Rainha, 30 km for Peniche (we can also arrange transfers).

We are 7 km from East London Airport, 10 km from the Industrial Development Zone, 3 km from the Racing Track and 13 km for Mercedes Benz.

Only points of interest within a reasonable distance of Labuan Bajo (generally 20 km for accommodation and 50 km for sights) are marked on the map.

Only points of interest within a reasonable distance of Nusa Penida (generally 20 km for accommodation and 50 km for sights) are marked on the map.

If you are hooked on golf there are 10 excellent golf courses within 50 km for you to try out.

The Strip is 300 metres away, and Algarve Shopping mall is only 10 km for those that feel the need to shop!

We are near schools, the gholf course and the centre of town, with several restaurants within a radius of 5 km for lunch or dinner.

There will be assisted downwinders in Blouberg, 3 km for beginners and 8 km for riders.

Only points of interest within a reasonable distance of Gili Trawangan (generally 20 km for accommodation and 50 km for sights) are marked on the map.

There's a wide variety of them, starting from 0,3 km up to 82 km for the more adventurous visitors.

The total distance of trails is up to 6 km for the upper and lower falls, but the upper falls are close to the parking lot, so you will see one of the most scenic parts after just a short 10 min walk in.

Only points of interest within a reasonable distance of Gili Meno (generally 20 km for accommodation and 50 km for sights) are marked on the map.

If you moved more than 40 km for a new job or school you can deduct those expenses.

With reference to fuel consumption, the F - PACE did receive a fair flogging at times, and the figures posted by the trip computer reflected that: 10.5 L / 100 km for the F - PACE 35t (on a gentler drive section), 8.9 L / 100 km for the F - PACE 20d, and 10.1 L / 100 km for the F - PACE 30d.

The Euro IV compliant unit also offers impressively low carbon dioxide emissions, with a CO2 figure of just 149g / km for the five - door hatch and 158g / km for the Wagon, meaning the newcomer will appeal as much to fleets as it will to cost - conscious private buyers.

Fuel economy for a not - so - small petrol engine is decent: With a week long drive of chiefly urban commuting and errand running, with a smattering of freeway driving, the result was 7.4 L / 100 km for this entry - level HR - V.

The Lancer's combined average fuel consumption is 8.8 L / 100 km for the five - speed manual and 8.9 L / 100 km for the CVT, which is 25 % higher than the Ford Focus, 34 % more than the Mazda 3 and 26 % higher than the Toyota Corolla.

More impressive is its fuel consumption: Peugeot claims 4.2 L / 100 km combined with 107g / km CO2 (3.8 L / 100 km and 99g / km for the smaller but taller 3008 Hybrid4).

Fuel use is rated at 8.8 litres per 100 km for the manual and 8.9 L / 100 km for the CVT.

The emission numbers stand at 181g / km for the manual and 164g / km for the automatic.While it promises to be fun to drive, the 86 is not a straight - line weapon, with a 0 - 100 km / h time of 7.6 seconds for the manual.

All figures are DIN and recorded using 98 RON fuel, which the Pursuit Ute consumes at the rate of 14.0 L / 100 km for the six - speed manual and 14.2 L / 100 km for the six - speed automatic.

Toyota has also confirmed the 86 will be reasonably efficient, with an official average fuel consumption figure of 7.8 L / 100 km for the manual, while the automatic version drives the number down to just 7.1 L / 100 km.

This contrasts to 11.1 L / 100 km for a (very) spirited 300 km haul in the SDV6.

Although we didn't get a representative consumption figure for the AWD Intens, maybe our better - than - official figure of 7.7 L / 100 km for the two - wheel drive Zen is some indication of the car's potential.

Consumption in the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) for plug - in hybrid models amounts to 2.9 l / 100 km for super-grade petrol (66 g / km of CO2) and 16.2 kWh / 100 km for electric power.

The Q60 GT scored an official fuel consumption figure of 7.7 L / 100 km, making it the least economical of the group (BMW for example claims 5.8 L / 100 km for its 420I), and its CO2 emissions are the highest too at 175g / km where the BMW sneaks down to 134g / km.