Sentences with phrase «km fuel consumption»

That's combined with a claimed 7.7 L / 100 km fuel consumption average.

The 5 l / 100 km fuel consumption though is much too optimistic.

And we didn't come too close to the 4.8 L / 100 km fuel consumption claim with an average 6.1 L / 100 km recorded over a week of urban and freeway driving.

Vehicle: 2002 VW Golf (German) Engine: 1.4 liter, gasoline 75 hp Odometer: 60k miles / 100k km Fuel consumption: 29 - 33 MPG / 7 - 8 liters / 100 km Oil used: 5W30...

With a fully - charged battery and a driver who can resist the urge to exploit 680 hp, Porsche says the Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid is good for a 2.9 L / 100 km fuel consumption rating, according to the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) measurement.

Consider too the Range Rover Sport's sub - 11.0 L / 100 km fuel consumption during the week we tested it (10.2 by the time we handed it back), despite unconstrained use of its 250kW / 740Nm output and lack of an auto - stop facility.

What Ford theoretically advertises as a 4.2 l / 100 km fuel consumption figure turns into 7.4 l / 100 km in the real world, which is below diesel territory but way better when it comes to CO2 emissions: 99 g / km.

OPC clams a 6.0 0 - 100 km / h time and 8.1 L / 100 km fuel consumption average with the help of auto stop - start.

Also, the AMG version announce a 10,1 l / 100 km fuel consumption, which mean 0,4 l / 100 km lower than old version despite 41 HP and 100 Nm more performance.

According to the certification issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), the vehicle's 7.9 L / 100 km fuel consumption (29.8 mpg US) is one of the best in the segment.

Maybe the engine lacks some fizzy character, but most of us would take the real world 6.3 L / 100 km fuel consumption average we achieved over that any time.

Do the same sums for the petrol LX 570 with its 14.4 L / 100 km fuel consumption average and 138 - litre tanks and the range is much the same as the diesel.

This is an area where the Golf GTI dominates with its 6.5 L / 100 km fuel consumption average, absolutely monstering the i30 N's 8.0 L / 100 km.

The Veloce accelerates to100km / h in 5.8 sec and claims a fuel consumption average of 6.8 L / 100 km, the Super diesel claims a 7.1 sec 0 - 100 km / h time and stellar 4.2 L / 100 km fuel consumption and the entry - level 2.0 claims a 6.6 sec 0 - 100 km / h and 6.0 L / 100 km.

Expected to be the top - seller is the 1.8 TFSI, which packs a 1798cc turbo - petrol four offering 132kW and 250Nm (1250 - 5000rpm), a 7.3 - second 0 - 100 km / h sprint time, 235km / h top speed and 5.6 L / 100 km fuel consumption, making it the thirstiest of a frugal bunch.

But it avoids the tax due to its sub - 7.0 L / 100 km fuel consumption, which earns it a «green car» dispensation from the tax.

Both cars are front - wheel drive (of course), have a matching MacPherson strut front and multi-link rear suspension concept, a combination of vented front and solid rear disc brakes, electric - assist power steering and even claim an identical 6.0 L / 100 km fuel consumption average (on the cheapest 91 RON fuel).

With all that performance, how can a GT2 RS owner possibly coax out the claimed 11.9 L / 100 km fuel consumption is anyone's guess.

Although it's somewhat uncharacteristic to hear a turbo engine working away in a Honda, the actual outcomes are pleasing: With a claimed 6.0 L / 100 km fuel consumption (better than the 6.4 L / 100 km claimed for 1.8 - litre versions of the Civic), and a 140g / km CO2 reading, it's at the top end of the class.

Speaking of economy, Porsche makes one pretty incredible claim for the Cayenne S E-Hybrid and that is its 3.4 L / 100 km fuel consumption average.

The new 2.0 liter 195 HP promise a 3.9 l / 100 km fuel consumption (102 g / km CO2 emissions), 0.6 l / 100 km less than the old 2.2 liter diesel which need 4.5 l / 100 km (117 g / km CO2 emissions).

Falcon facts — 12 - 13 litres / 100 km fuel consumption, most have 4.1 litre motors — 80 % are automatic.