Sentences with phrase «km fuel economy»

* All - new, sporty, aerodynamic, 2 +2 coupe form * Wide track, short wheelbase chassis for agile and responsive handling * Unique 3 - Mode Drive System to tailor steering, throttle response and IMA assistance to the driver's needs * 1.5 - litre i - VTEC engine coupled to the Honda IMA parallel hybrid system with CO2 emissions of 117 g / km and 5.0 l / 100 km fuel economy in combined mode * World's first 6 - speed manual transmission combined with a hybrid drive train * Driver focussed cockpit design with 3D gauges * European market cars to be equipped with flexible 2 +2 seating arrangement

The latter offer performance and efficiency benefits beyond their simple reduced mass — reduced frictional and rotational losses contribute up to 0.4 L / 100 km of the 3.2 L / 100 km fuel economy advantage Porsche claims the Panamera delivers in comparison to comparable «large luxury four - doors in the 400 and 500hp class».

Five - star NCAP - tested safety, sub - 5.0 L / 100 km fuel economy, affordable pricing and enough kit in even base - grade form to sink a battleship are all points in the VW's favour.

«On - board this car we have e-tron technology with 515 kW of power and 2.5 l / 100 km fuel economy; laser headlights that leave all previous systems in the dark with its higher performance as well as new display and operating systems with cutting - edge electronic performance.

Not exact matches

China's fuel economy rules, as stringent as those to be enforced in the United States, Europe and Japan, involve a fleet - wide corporate average target of 6.9 liters per 100 km in 2015 and 5.0 liters in 2020.

Even the ’12 Buick LaCrosse with eAssist, a mild hybrid that trumps many rivals in fuel economy, becomes less compelling, rated at 25/37 mpg (9.4 - 6.3 L / 100 km).

Two rounds of historic fuel - economy - standard increases in recent years now have the industry marching toward 54.5 mpg (4.3 L / 100 km) in 2025.

To atone for its high - speed sins the M838TE engine also has stop - start to improve fuel economy (26.4 mpg combined) and reduce emissions (249g / km).

While the car boasted eye - popping fuel economy, 70 mpg (3.4 L / 100 km) highway — an all - time record for certification from the EPA — the price of regular unleaded in the U.S. that month was only $ 1.25 - $ 1.26, equivalent to $ 1.76 - $ 1.77 today.

However the phrase for fuel economy in metric countries is either kilometers per liter or liters per 100 Km.

The BiTurbo boasts a 0 - 62mph tome of 4.6 seconds, but also retains respectable official fuel economy of 53.2 mpg and CO2 emissions of just 139g / km.

The Cooper D oil - burner has more low - down torque while serving up 74mpg fuel economy and zero road tax and congestion charge thanks to its 99g / km CO2 emissions.

That it can achieve those figures and still offer the best economy in the petrol line - up - with a 60.1 mpg fuel economy figure and emissions of 109g / km - is pretty extraordinary.

That ups the headline power and torque figures to 335bhp and 332 lb ft, but reduces emissions and improves fuel economy to 149g / km and 44.1 mpg, supposedly giving you the best of both worlds in terms of performance and parsimony.

MPG and running costs > Audi claims a combined fuel economy figure of 40.4 mpg and 162g / km of CO2 for the S - tronic.

The latest member of Ford's EcoBoost turbocharged direct - injected gasoline engine family is found now in the Fiesta subcompact with a base price of $ 16,050 and a highway fuel - economy rating of 45 mpg (5.2 L / 100 km) with a 5 - speed manual transmission.

Fuel - efficiency ratings for all three engines are yet to be announced, but GM says the 2.5 L will achieve the highest fuel economy in Cadillac's history, well above 30 mpg (7.8 L / 100 Fuel - efficiency ratings for all three engines are yet to be announced, but GM says the 2.5 L will achieve the highest fuel economy in Cadillac's history, well above 30 mpg (7.8 L / 100 fuel economy in Cadillac's history, well above 30 mpg (7.8 L / 100 km).

Test drives earlier in the year by WardsAuto editors confirmed the Cruze diesel can exceed its 46 mpg (5.1 L / 100 km) highway fuel - economy rating.

Who wants to know the useless «official» fuel economy of the first 100 kms of a plug - in hybrid?

As auto makers, federal policy makers and environmentalists get ready to craft the next round of U.S. corporate average fuel economy, Tonkin raps an Environmental Protection Agency proposal to improve fuel - economy and carbon - dioxide - emissions reductions equivalent by as much as 62 mpg (3.9 L / 100 km).

The official fuel economy figure of 94.1 e-mpg (2.5 L / 100 km) on the European test cycle also makes it more economical than its predecessor.

Auto makers currently are working on efforts to achieve a government - ordered fleet - wide fuel economy of 35.5 mpg (6.6 L / 100 km) by 2016.

It helps contribute to 167g / km CO2 emissions and claimed 39.2 mpg fuel economy in manual - equipped cars.

The Passat GTE, available in both saloon and estate body styles, aims to mix 8 - second 0 - 62mph and 136mph performance with an NEDC combined fuel economy figure of 141mpg and CO2 emissions under 45g / km.

Fuel economy rises by 1 mpg (0.4 km / L) in Juke front - wheel - drive models in city and combined driving, with the model now hitting 28 mpg and 30 mpg (8.4 and 7.8 L / 100 km), respectively.

Count on a higher degree of engagement this time around, especially with a hike in fuel - economy and carbon - dioxide - emissions reductions equivalent to 62 mpg (3.9 L / 100 km) on the table.

That means more money to lobby harder for equivalent fuel - economy rules close to 47 mpg (5.0 L / 100 km) by 2025, also suggested earlier this year by regulators.

The WardsAuto Fuel Economy Index shows an average25.4 mpg (9.3 L / 100 km) for light vehicles sold in the U.S. in first - half 2017.

This year, auto makers begin stepping toward a fleet - wide fuel economy of 35.5 mpg (6.6 L / 100 km) by 2016, a standard handed down in 2009 as auto makers limped through the worst sales year in the post-war era.

I m really lucky with the car, but the fuel economy isn t really that great... its not about the money, but I have a bad feeling burning so much gas, cause I driving a lot of km / year.

The MKZ's powertrain configuration provides decent fuel economy, with Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27 mpg city / highway (12 - 9 L / 100 km) for the front - wheel - drive version and 18/26 mpg city / highway (13 - 9 L / 100 km) for AWD models.

Adding all - wheel drive drops the fuel economy to 21/28 mpg (11 - 8 L / 100 km).

It doesn't do anything for fuel economy though, which sits at 16.6 mpg with exhaust emissions of 397g / km.

Factoring in the need for every editor to occasionally wind up Stuttgart's newest music box, the staff did quite well, consistently returning to the parking deck with a fuel economy rating of about 23 mpg (10.2 L / 100 km).

On electric power alone the 9.9 kWh capacity is enough for 31 miles of engine - off running (charging in 2h30m from a 3.6 kW wall box) and thanks to its contribution in NEDC fuel economy testing, results in the eyebrow - raising 166mpg and 39g / km CO2 ratings.

At the same time, fuel economy and CO2 emissions are a tad better at 19.9 mpg and 332g / km.

A dash to 62 mph now takes 4.2 seconds (versus 3.5 seconds to 60 mph with dual - clutch onboard), with a combined fuel economy of 14.9 l / 100 km (15.79 mpg) on the Euro cycle.

The engine is EU6 compliant and Lamborghini claims 290g / km CO2 emissions and 22.6 mpg fuel economy.

Still, the mass of the vehicle is part of the hybrid's claimed 45 mpg (5.2 L / 100 km) fuel economy.

Naturally, the new engine is also cleaner and more economical, with Vauxhall claiming fuel economy of 51mpg and CO2 emissions of 154g / km.

BMW also claims 113mpg fuel economy and 59g / km of CO2 emissions.

The diesel's fuel economy gain was less marked, from 5.9 L / 100 km (39.9 mpg ‑ US) for the previous manual transmission - only diesel model to 5.4 L / 100 km (43.6 mpg ‑ US) for the new automatic - only offering.

The next - gen Mazda3 powered by this engine should have a fuel economy rating of 30 km / l.

Fuel economy for the AWD model is rated at 21 mpg in the city and 28 on the highway for a 24.5 combined rating (11.1 L / 100 km city, 8.6 highway, 10 combined), which is pretty much on par with what the Stelvio gets.

Despite a heavy foot, the Jetta returns fuel - economy readouts above its combined 34 mpg (6.9 L / 100 km) EPA rating.

When fitted in the Golf SV BlueMotion, this last engine is expected to return fuel economy of 76.3 mpg and emit 95 g / km of CO2.

Fuel economy is rated at 22 mpg in the city and 28 on the highway for a combined 24 (10.8 L / 100 km city, 8.3 highway, 9.6 combined).

Emissions and fuel economy are 169g / km and 39.8 mpg, a touch down on the hatch but still impressive considering the performance on offer.

The energy consumption was rated at 40 kWh / 100 miles for combined city / highway driving, corresponding to a fuel economy of 84 miles per gallon gasoline equivalent - MPGe -(2.8 L / 100 km; 101 mpg imp).

[99] As a result of its improved battery pack, the 2013 model year EPA rating climbed to a combined city / highway fuel economy of 98 miles per gallon gasoline equivalent (2.4 L gasoline equivalent / 100 km; 118 mpg - imp gasoline equivalent).