Sentences with phrase «km fuel use»
On the slightly larger XF, the engine brings a 5.9 second time and 6.8 L / 100 km fuel use figure, while on the F - Pace, the engine notches triple figures in 6.0 seconds and uses a still - credible 7.7 L / 100 km combined.
https://www.motoring.com.au/ Not exact matches
Sainsbury's is beginning daily food deliveries from its depot in Bristol (UK) to the supermarket's new environmental store in Dartmouth — a 500 km (311 miles) round trip — using a Mercedes - Benz Axor truck fueled with biomethane produced from landfill gas.
Even using conventional port fuel injection, Honda's 3.5 L V - 6 beats most turbo - 4s by routinely delivering 28 mpg (8.4 L / 100 km) during our evaluations, same as it did last year, thanks in part to cylinder deactivation.
If you're really worried about fuel use the one to look out for is the plug - in hybrid 330e, with a claimed 148.7 mpg and 44g / km of CO2.
My 1997 VW Golf 3 is over-consuming fuel, I use 10 liters for 45 km, My mechanic ask me to change the automatic gear - box because it is not selecting gear above gear 3 I change the automatic gear - box...
Naturally the range - topping T5 version uses a little more fuel, returning 47.9 mpg and emitting 137g / km.
With a fuel consumption of 8.4 litres per 100 km and CO2 emissions of 199 grams per kilometre (NEDC combined), the naturally - aspirated AMG V8 engine comes in at or below the level of its competitors, however these are unable to match either the output or torque of the SLK 55 AMG — and above all, they do not use large - displacement eight - cylinder engines.
This model uses a 1.6 - litre diesel engine producing 110 PS, has a six - speed manual gearbox, and is expected to achieve a combined fuel consumption of just 85.6 mpg (equivalent to 87 g / km of CO2).
Audi A6 Sedan: Combined fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 7.1 — 5.5 (33.1 — 42.8 mpg); Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 161 — 142 (259.1 — 228.5 g / mi) Fuel consumption and CO2 emission figures given in ranges depending on the tires / wheels fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 7.1 — 5.5 (33.1 — 42.8 mpg); Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 161 — 142 (259.1 — 228.5 g / mi) Fuel consumption and CO2 emission figures given in ranges depending on the tires / wheels Fuel consumption and CO2 emission figures given in ranges depending on the tires / wheels used
The new Seville / Eldorado chassis featured an advanced transmission and engine control system that offered EPA fuel consumption figures of nearly 30 mpg ‑ US (7.8 L / 100 km; 36 mpg ‑ imp) on the highway using a small fuel injected V8.
Variant name: S PERFORMANCE, Derivative: MK2, Variant: S PERFORMANCE In February 2006, Lotus announced the Exige S model which used a supercharged Toyota engine producing 220 bhp (164 kW; 223 PS) The Lotus Exige S model, weighing 2,057 lb (933 kg), has the following specifications: Engine Toyota supplied, 1796 cc I4, DOHC with VVTL - i (variable valve timing and lift - intelligent), supercharged and intercooled Bore / Stroke 82 mm / 85 mm 218 hp (163 kW; 221 PS) @ 7800 rpm 158.6 lb ⋅ ft (215 N ⋅ m) @ 5500 rpm Compression ratio: 11.5:1 Transmission 6 - speed, close ratio with single - plate dry clutch Performance 0 - 60 (0 - 100 km / h): 4.1 seconds 0 - 100 mph (0 - 161 km / h): 9.98 seconds Top speed: 148 mph (238 km / h) Fuel consumption: 24 miles per imperial gallon Our Exige S Performance Touring + is finished in Metallic Aspen White with Black Alcantra and Leather interior, Matt Black Alloy Wheels, Air Conditioning, only 41000miles with full service history.
Topping the range is the Mulliner Driving Specification with 22 - inch forged alloys, embroidered Bentley emblems, additional veneer options, a jewelled - finish fuel filler, sports pedals, indented leather headliner and a new «diamond - in - diamond» interior trim pattern that comprises exactly 712 stitches for each diamond and uses 2.8 km of thread in every car, each of which requires nine leather hides to produce.
Of course, there's always a price for luxury, and besides the minor sticker shock, you might want to reevaluate your driving habits when you consider the fuel economy; at an estimated 12.5 L / 100 km in the city, and a more respectable 8.9 L on the highway, you'll start feeling guilty if you use the Sienna for short errands around town.
It will serve you not more than ~ 50 000 km (30 000 miles) of mileage in case you use fuel of low quality.
The good thing about using a plug - in hybrid setup is improved fuel efficiency, and Land Rover claims the Range Rover Sport P400e averages just 2.8 l / 100 km (101 mpg UK), with corresponding CO2 emissions of only 64 g / km.
The Optima Hybrid uses the Hyundai Sonata Hybrid powertrain, combining a 2.4 - liter MPI engine with a six - speed automatic transmission, and a 30kW electric motor and lightweight lithium polymer batteries to produce a full gasoline - electric hybrid with an estimated fuel consumption of 37 mpg ‑ US (6.4 L / 100 km; 44 mpg ‑ imp) city and 39 mpg ‑ US (6.0 L / 100 km; 47 mpg ‑ imp) highway.
The high - performance V6 uses unusually high - compression for a twin - turbo engine and runs to Miller Cycle philosophies, which help slash fuel consumption by 17 per cent to 8.8 L / 100 km, for 199 grams of CO2 / km.
So if Peugeot can get 199kW out of the previous 1.6 Prince engine used in the R56 and have it pull 0 - 100 km in 5.9 seconds with a six speed manual (instead of 6.1 with the supposedly faster auto in the F56), I'm really not understanding why Mini chose to stuff a 2.0 litre in the F56 — especially given it's heavier and uses more fuel in real world driving.
Now if you are really into fuel economy, the Hybrid model uses the same engine, an electric motor and a 16 - kWh lithium - ion battery to improve that number even more — it offers up to 48 km of electric - only driving.
Around town during the first week the Santa Fe used as much as 12.9 L / 100 km, but with a family of four and enough luggage aboard for those few days away, the open - road fuel consumption fell as low as 8.2.
The Kia delivers its punch with a sweet - sounding turbo «whoosh» which begs you to drive harder, and yet returns an entirely acceptable fuel - use average of 8.4 L / 100 km (as tested).
[2][9][10] When used in the latest Golf with the 90 kilowatts (122 PS; 121 hp) engine, this new seven - speed DSG uses roughly 6 % (5.9 l / 100 km for the seven - speed DSG compared to 6.3 l / 100 km with the six - speed manual gearbox) less fuel than the same engine with a manual transmission [9] and up to 20 % less than a conventional automatic transmission.
Like the new Golf GTD, it is the manual box that is the more fuel efficient, using 6.0 l / 100 km whereas the 6 - speed DSG is rated at 6.4 l / 100 km (GTI Performance 6.5 l / 100 km).
Even better news is that BMW's spanner men and women have managed to make the 30d engine more economical, now using fuel consumption of 6.2 L / 100 km, down from its predecessors 7.4 L / 100 km.
The car uses a gasoline - electric hybrid powertrain which enables it to deliver fuel efficiency figures of 2.1 - litres per 100 Km and CO2 emission levels of 49 grams per Km.
* Horsepower and torque expected to top previous model (testing is ongoing — check media.gm.com for updates) * NOx emissions reduced at least 63 percent over 2010 models * Quieter operation * High - pressure (30,000 psi / 2, 000 bar) Piezo - actuated fuel system for greater fuel efficiency, improved performance and reduced emissions * Exhaust brake system that enables controlled vehicle slowdown on downhill grades without actuating the brakes * Selective catalytic reduction after - treatment system using diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) injection to provide the best overall diesel characteristics and performance — with a range of about 5,000 miles (8,000 km) between DEF refills * Combustion and after - treatment have been optimized to provide about 700 miles (1,125 km) between diesel particulate filter regenerations — a 75 - percent improvement over the previous system and significant contributor to improved fuel efficiency, as the regeneration process requires additional fuel * B20 biodiesel capability for an alternative fueling option * Internal revisions that improve durability
Under load, the Optima «GT» did use the most fuel of our group at 13.1 L / 100 km against an ADR combined sticker claim of 8.1 L / 100 km.
The aim was simple, each car must have a crew of two and cover the 660 km test route using as little fuel as possible.
Euro 5 - compliant, the 77kW engine uses fuel at the rate of 6.6 L / 100 km in combined - cycle testing and emits 154g / km of CO2 for the same test.
[17] Car and Driver recorded another 18 mpg ‑ US (13 L / 100 km; 22 mpg ‑ imp) figure and noted its»... fuel economy that won't live up to the 22 mpg ‑ US (11 L / 100 km; 26 mpg ‑ imp) / 32 mpg ‑ US (7.4 L / 100 km; 38 mpg ‑ imp) EPA ratings in real - world use...».
In 2015, the 1.3 - liter model was dropped and a new 1.5 - liter 2NR - FKE engine was used for 2WD models, this new version has a fuel efficiency of 22.2 km / L (63 mpg ‑ imp; 52 mpg ‑ US) under the JC08 test cycle.
Best - in - class vehicles have the lowest estimated annual fuel use, based on 20,000 km driven with a mix of 55 percent city and 45 percent highway.
Officially, nought to 100km / h takes 6.8 sec — 0.2 sec slower than its countryman — and fuel use is rated at 5.4 L / 100 km combined (versus 5.9 L / 100 km).
During a stretch of miserably cold weather, I achieved an overall fuel consumption rating of 9.8 litres per 100 km — using «Eco» mode would probably return more impressive ratings.
[14] Fuel economy is virtually identical between generations, with the second generation earning a 1 - mile - per - US - gallon (0.43 km / L; 1.2 mpg ‑ imp) edge in highway driving (both measured using EPA 2008 guidelines).
That said, nobody considering the Yukon should expect much sympathy at the gas pumps — even using as light a foot on the gas pedal as possible in order to deactivate four of the big V8's cylinders, I averaged a swinish 17.6 L / 100 km (premium fuel recommended) during my time with the tester, the bulk of my driving suburban use.
The 116i, featuring an entirely new 1.6 litre four - cylinder turbocharged petrol engine, boasts the same power output of the previous entry model, the 118i, despite using 24 per cent less fuel (5.7 litres / 100 km) than the comparable outgoing model.
Ford says customers can expect fuel consumption improvements of more than 15 percent compared with the outgoing model, which means it will use between 6.0 and 6.8 litres / 100 km on the combined cycle.
With fuel consumption rated at 8.5 l / 100 km the 2 - litre four cylinder TSI reduces fuel use by a very respectable 21 per cent.
With the C4 Cactus AIRFLOW 2L concept, Citroën is demonstrating fuel consumption of 2l / 100 km (118 mpg US) through the use of optimized design with a 20 % improvement in aerodynamics; lower rolling resistance (Tall & Narrow) tires;... Read more →
Other models that might be unveiled are a new efficient diesel C - Class that will be on the market by 2011 that uses less than five liters of fuel per 100 km and only emits less than 130g of carbon - dioxide per km.
Average fuel economy hovered around 8.0 L / 100 km, according to the trip computer, but to minimise fuel use the transmission tends to choose the highest gear possible around town, which sometimes results in the engine laboring at around 1000rpm.
With 450Nm of torque from 1500rpm, the xDrive25d hits 100km / h in 6.6 seconds and has the same 235km / h top speed as the petrol flagship, but uses about 1.3 L / 100 km less fuel doing it (5.0 L / 100 km).
Even so the compact car, weighing in at only 1,575 kilograms (3,472.28 pounds), uses on average just 9.1 liters of fuel per 100 km (25.85 US mpg) and emits 212 g CO2 per km (341.18 g / mile).
During the week long test my average fuel use was 5.7 L / 100 km which is surprisingly good considering how poorly my results usually normally are.
It goes from 0 - 100 km / h in 6.3 seconds before hitting a 225 km / h top speed, yet uses just 2.1 litres of fuel per 100 km and emits just 49 grams of CO2 per kilometre.
Powered by 1.5 litre dCi (common rail direct injection) engine, the Lodgy covered a distance of 1,388 km, using only 32.91 litres of fuel.
However, it's the optional 2.0 - litre turbo - diesel engine that leads the fuel efficiency race, pumping out a healthy 132kW / 400Nm but using fuel at a rate of just 5.1 L / 100 km in the hatch — less than the Toyota Camry Hybrid (5.2 L / 100 km).
Fuel consumption is unchanged, both power units using idle - stop technology and requiring 6.3 L / 100 km in seven - seat form (up 0.2 L / 100 km on the five - seat version), making the choice even easier.
Filling the car with fuel is another regular cost and Ford claims the Mondeo uses 8.5 L / 100 km averaged across city and urban driving, which puts it at the thirstier end of this pack.