Sentences with phrase «km highway for»
The Acadia, which comes standard with a 2.5 - litre engine, is estimated to return 8.4 L / 100 km highway for FWD models; and 10.7 L / 100 km city, thanks in part to stop - start technology, a first for GMC.
http://www.autofocus.ca/ Not exact matches
While the car boasted eye - popping fuel economy, 70 mpg (3.4 L / 100 km) highway — an all - time record for certification from the EPA — the price of regular unleaded in the U.S. that month was only $ 1.25 - $ 1.26, equivalent to $ 1.76 - $ 1.77 today.
Since I'll have to drive a couple thousand kms tomorrow at highway speeds, I'd like to know if I'll be safe driving at 110 ~ 130kph for an extended duration.
The MKZ's powertrain configuration provides decent fuel economy, with Environmental Protection Agency ratings of 19/27 mpg city / highway (12 - 9 L / 100 km) for the front - wheel - drive version and 18/26 mpg city / highway (13 - 9 L / 100 km) for AWD models.
I overfilled the engine with about 1/2 litre too much engine oil and drove at high speeds on highway for about 80 kms.
Was in Germany, Europapark, high speed highway blasts and aggressive accelerations, queues and pick hour crawl through city traffic, 9.3 liters per 100 km, not bad for NA 3.4 boxer - six, imho.
Fuel economy for the AWD model is rated at 21 mpg in the city and 28 on the highway for a 24.5 combined rating (11.1 L / 100 km city, 8.6 highway, 10 combined), which is pretty much on par with what the Stelvio gets.
In that setting, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio manages an efficient 22 mpg in the city, 28 on the highway and 24 mpg combined (10.8 / 8.3 / 9.6 L / 100 km), which is respectable for the segment.
Fuel economy is rated at 22 mpg in the city and 28 on the highway for a combined 24 (10.8 L / 100 km city, 8.3 highway, 9.6 combined).
The energy consumption was rated at 40 kWh / 100 miles for combined city / highway driving, corresponding to a fuel economy of 84 miles per gallon gasoline equivalent - MPGe -(2.8 L / 100 km; 101 mpg imp).
of torque @ 4,400 rpm Transmission Five - speed manual (four - speed automatic optional) Brakes Front - wheel discs with four - wheel ABS Tires P185 / 60R15 Price: base / as tested $ 9,995 / $ 16,733 Destination charge $ 1,400 Natural Resources Canada fuel economy L / 100 km 8.8 city, 6.6 highway Standard features 15 - inch steel wheels with wheel covers, 60/40 split folding rear seat, AM / FM / CD audio system with auxiliary input jack and four speakers, trip computer, rear wiper, tilt steering column, rear window defroster, four - way manual driver's seat, cloth seats, speed - sensitive volume Options Cruise control, air conditioning, Bluetooth, reverse camera, keyless entry, fog lights, power windows, power door locks, cargo cover, arm rest for driver, 4.3 - inch colour display, USB / iPod connection, and more
It also returned a highway - only economy run of 5.6 L / 100 km, which is better than its posted rating and exceptionally good for a non-hybrid.
None of them mentioned the brilliant LED lighting or the deliberate decisions of the eight - speed transmission, or that highway fuel economy, at roughly 8.5 L / 100 km, was good enough for a range of 750 kilometres on a full tank — stuff that required my experienced observation.
The Prado also scores points for its exceptional fuel range, its dual tanks delivering 149 litres of capacity compared to 80 litres for the Everest, while it managed 12.4 L / 100 km on this test (from the highway to the top of Mount Blue Rag) versus 12.7 L / 100 km for the Everest.
Of course, there's always a price for luxury, and besides the minor sticker shock, you might want to reevaluate your driving habits when you consider the fuel economy; at an estimated 12.5 L / 100 km in the city, and a more respectable 8.9 L on the highway, you'll start feeling guilty if you use the Sienna for short errands around town.
The penalty for the added performance is heavy at 2.3 litres per 100 kilometres in the city over the four - cylinder engine; however, on the highway the difference becomes insignificant — 0.3 L / 100 km.
For 2009, the United States Environmental Protection Agency fuel economy was increased to 24 mpg ‑ US (9.8 L / 100 km; 29 mpg ‑ imp) city / 34 mpg ‑ US (6.9 L / 100 km; 41 mpg ‑ imp) highway with automatic transmission, and 26 mpg ‑ US (9.0 L / 100 km; 31 mpg ‑ imp) city / 37 mpg ‑ US (6.4 L / 100 km; 44 mpg ‑ imp) highway with manual transmission.
We saw it hovering around 19L / 100 km for mostly highway driving and we weren't trying particularly hard.
The EnerGuide fuel economy rating for the Laramie's Hemi is 17.2 L / 100 km in the city, 12.7 L / 100 km on the highway, while the EcoDiesel claims 12.1 L and 8.8 L, respectively; note that the diesel claims better city fuel economy than the Hemi does on the highway.
It doesn't sound like a big deal, but a common perk with diesel engines is their abundance of torque; the 2.0 in the Cruze puts out an impressive 264 lb - ft of grunt, for example, while still managing a fuel consumption of just 7.5 L / 100 km city and 4.2 L / 100 km highway, making the diesel the most efficient Cruze in the entire lineup.
The driver seemed to have taken a refreshment break, logging kms on the highway and generating vital data for the engineers.
Other gasoline - only powered Civic sedans and coupes get 39 mpg ‑ US (6.0 L / 100 km; 47 mpg ‑ imp) in highway tests, an improvement of 3 mpg ‑ US (3.6 mpg ‑ imp) over previous generation, and 28 mpg ‑ US (8.4 L / 100 km; 34 mpg ‑ imp) for city driving.
A HF model, the most fuel - efficient gasoline - only powered Civic in the lineup, gets 41 mpg ‑ US (5.7 L / 100 km; 49 mpg ‑ imp)(17.54 km / L) under EPA highway test cycle, compares with 36 mpg ‑ US (6.5 L / 100 km; 43 mpg ‑ imp)(15.38 km / L) for previous generation, increasing the combined fuel economy rating to 33 mpg ‑ US (7.1 L / 100 km; 40 mpg ‑ imp)(14.08 km / L).
Fuel efficiency is similar for both cars, ranging from 14 - 16 km / l in the city and going all the way to 19 km / l on the highways.
The Americans from Chevrolet released today the official pricing for the new Malibu Eco, a model which stands out by its highway fuel economy of 38mpg (6,18 liters / 100 km).
The estimated fuel consumption for the 2.0 T model is 22 mpg (10.6 l / 100 km) in the city and 32 mpg (7.3 l / 100 km) on the highway.
HI Friends, after lot of opposes from my friends and relatives I have taken this car on 15 th of april and it clocked nearly 2000 km till now, The main thing attracted me towards this car is its looks, car is awesome in leg room and head room aria, ground clearance is excellent and the rear part of the car is simply superb but the milage is lil bit disappointing near about 18 km / l in highway, when I went to showroom for 1 st service after 1000 km usage the service manager said after 2 nd service milage will improve, hoping so....
The first mass production PHEV available in the U.S. market, the 2011 Chevrolet Volt, with an EPA rated all - electric range of 35 miles (56 km), and an additional gasoline - only extended range of 344 miles (554 km) has an EPA combined city / highway fuel economy of 93 MPG - e in all - electric mode, and 37 mpg ‑ US (6.4 L / 100 km; 44 mpg ‑ imp) in gasoline - only mode, for an overall combined gas - electric fuel economy rating of 60 mpg ‑ US (3.9 L / 100 km; 72 mpg ‑ imp) equivalent (MPG - e).
Official fuel ratings for this vehicle with AWD are 10.7 L / 100 km in the city and 8.3 L / 100 km on the highway; on our drive, we averaged around 9.0 L / 100 km.
It may seem a tad underpowered, but the benefit is stellar fuel economy (with AWD, the CR - V is rated at 9.1 L / 100 km in the city, 7.2 on the highway for a combined rating of 8.3).
While other reviewers seemed to enjoy the 2.4 L that advertises a fuel economy rating of 6.9 L / 100 km for highway driving, this fortysomething found a complete and unsatisfying lack of torque at just about any speed, especially at the low end.
Fuel economy shouldn't be too much of a concern as well, with a city rating of 12.9 L / 100 km city and 9.8 highway, for a combined rating of 11.5 L / 100 km.
2018 Natural Resources Canada estimated fuel consumption for the plug - in hybrid GLC 350e is X.X/X.X Lₑ / 100 km city / highway.
Fuel economy (8.8 L / 100 km city, 7.3 highway) is also quite good for this small performer.
Equally positive was fuel economy that left me wondering if there wasn't a strong tailwind pushing me along (I didn't note much wind), because the 7.2 L / 100 km highway I recorded is excellent for a 1,659 - kilogram sport - ute.
12.9 L / 100 km (22 mpg) city and 8.4 L / 100 km (34 mpg) highway fuel consumption ratings for 2017 Chrysler Pacifica with 3.6 L Pentastar ™ VVT V6 engine and 9 - speed automatic transmission.
This engine package combines for a total output of 182 horsepower will consuming fuel at an estimated rate of 5.6 litres / 100 km on the highway.
For the record, the last Mazda6 I tested enjoyed lots of highway driving in summer weather and returned 7.0 L / 100 km — and that was before i - ELOOP became available.
With 55 % city, 45 % highway, you can drive the Sentra for 404 miles (650 km) on a 13.2 - gallon (50L) tank.
Thus equipped, combined fuel consumption is reduced by 3.0 % (the 2015 numbers of 8.5 L / 100 km city and 6.4 highway look higher than last year's, but that's because of the tougher 5 - cycle test procedure introduced for 2015.)
Admittedly, the route involved a net elevation gain of almost 300 metres, but even according to the official government figures, the 1.0's combined fuel consumption of 7.1 L / 100 km (5.9 highway) is only 12.5 % lighter than for the 2.0 with manual transmission.
The Mazda6 equipped with i - ELOOP rates 8.5 L / 100 km in the city and 5.9 L / 100 km on the highway — impressive numbers for a midsize sedan, and about 3.5 % more fuel - frugal than the regular car.
Also interesting to note that the CVT scores fairly significantly better on the Transport Canada fuel - economy scale, achieving city / highway numbers of 7.0 / 5.9 L / 100 km versus 8.1 / 6.6 for the stick shift.
The 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid (earlier post) is EPA - rated at 46 mpg (5.11 l / 100 km) combined, 47 mpg city and 46 mpg highway; the powertrain shares the transmission architecture with the 2016 Chevrolet Volt extended range electric vehicle (EREV), but includes changes to optimize the system for engine - driven charge - sustaining operation in the range of conditions represented by the US EPA 5 cycle fuel economy tests.
Manufacturer - estimated ratings of 25 mpg city / 33 mpg highway / 28 mpg combined (9.4, 7.1 and 8.4 l / 100 lm, respectively) for the Outback 2.5 i model are up from 24/30/26 (9.8, 7.8 and 9.0 l / 100 km, respectively) in the 2014 model — a 7.7 % improvement in the combined figure.
-- Top speed: 130 mph / 210 km / h (250 km / h / 155 mph with Sport Line or M Sport)-- Preliminary EPA Mileage Estimates (mpg)-- 23 city / 35 highway / 27 combined for the 8 - speed sport automatic.
GM estimated fuel economy for the CTS with Twin - Turbo is 17 mpg city (13.8 l / 100 km) and 25 mpg highway (9.4 l / 100 km).
Fuel economy is rated at 26 mpg highway / 20 mpg city and 22 mpg combined for the 2WD model (9.0, 11.8 and 10.7 l / 100 km, respectively) and 25 mpg highway / 19 mpg city and 21 mpg combined for the 4WD model (9.4, 12.4 and 11.2 l / 100 km).
Talking about fuel efficiency, well this is a V6 engine pulling a 2.2 tonne car so efficiency is around 8 - 9 km / l under regular driving conditions but it improves slightly when you're out on the highways cruising for long distances.
The 2015 CR - V features increased EPA fuel economy ratings of 27/34/29 mpg (8.7 / 6.9 / 8.1 l / 100 km)(city / highway / combined) for front - wheel - drive models and 26/33/28 mpg (9.0 / 7.1 / 8.4 l / 100 km) for Real Time AWD models, both increasing +4 / +3 / +3 mpg over 2014 models — i.e., an increase in the combined rating of 11.5 % and 12 %, respectively, compared to the 2014 models.