But, here is a big data nerd caution: even though there seems to be a correlation, we don't
know about causation!
Not exact matches
But briefly, it is this: «orthodox» scientific uneasiness
about the role of purpose or final
causation in planetary evolution has its grounds partly in the fact that over the centuries most people who have tried to describe the role of purpose on Earth haven't
known «what» they were talking
about.
The proper interpretation of Lamarckian notions in genetics thus depends fully on
knowing «what» we are talking
about: all new patterns of efficient
causation in animal bodies can be traced to some occasions» subjective aims.
It came up at christmas dinner; at one point, the topic of breastfeeding came up, and my spouse's uncle started to say «I
know breastfeeding reduces the risk of allergies later» and, expecting him to move on to obesity and IQ and whatever else he was
about to say, I just said «
No, that's not true», and started trying to explain the difference between correlation and
causation, and the difficulties with prospective studies and confounding factors, etc..
I'm happy to
know that the study of allergy
causation are still happening, and that we're starting to understand more
about how and why they happen.
Well the only thing that makes me suspicious
about drawing conclusions from all of these nations where the people have a vegan or primarily vegan diet, is that I have done some research that claims the height can arise from genetics, as well as if a person is receiving enough food (now whether or not these studies went off of correlation and did not test actual
causation, I do not
know).
One thing to
know about statistics is that correlation isn't the same as
causation.
Basically it is what we do
know about the distribution, not what we don't
know (very rare wings) that tells us that we don't get to 100 %
causation.
As we
know it is
about the degree of anthropogenic
causation.
I
know that there also studies that show there is some coralation between vaccinations and increases in autism, I am not saying that's
causation but there are many doctors and people knowledgeable
about autism that would disagree with you, so yes it is worth discussion.
I believe that what I've written below is a good enough summary, for now, of what practitioners in Canada's common law jurisdictions need to
know about the effect of Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32 on the manner in which
causation is to be proved in negligence actions.
Those of us who need to
know such things
know that the SCC granted leave to appeal in Clements v Clements 2011 CanLII 36004 (from 2010 BCCA 581) where the issue will be the meaning of the Canadian material - contribution doctrine (and maybe some other things
about proof of
causation in Canadian tort law should the Court deign to go there.)
A former professor and a student at Charlotte School of Law should
know something
about causation, and so they have sued the American Bar Association for their problems at the law school.
The Fifth Circuit held that the press release in question was not sufficient to satisfy the requirements to establish loss
causation because «although the stock price dropped dramatically on the day of the 1 August 2006 press release, no new facts concerning Cyberonics» stock - option accounting were disclosed in that release which demonstrated that the «truth became
known»
about Cyberonics» challenged financial statements.»
Kellie, any thoughts on preparing a summary of whatever evidence is available from Factor Analysis, as opposed to simply talking
about simple correlations which don't of course — as you'd
know — tell us much
about actual
causation of the differences?