Not exact matches
Even more curious, Carlin appears to be a big fan of geo -
engineering, but how this squares with his apparent belief that we
know nothing
about what drives
climate, is puzzling.
And parents don't
know that our district will be the model for all others — because we do it best — we will collect SSP data in the form of social and emotional surveys, we will change our curriculum to socially
engineer our children with social and emotional instruction without parents suspecting a thing, we will assess and survey up the wazoo
about academics, school
climate, cyberbullying, etc. while willing parents stand by, we will enhance our teacher evaluation program and refine it into a well - oiled teacher manipulation machine, and since our kids would do well no matter what because we have uber - involved parents, it will look like everything the Administrators are doing at the State's recommendation causes the success.
I'm researching the sceptics view of
climate change for an international
engineering firm that needs to
know more
about how this issue will affect us... I've got the IPCC report and other things that support anthropogenic
climate change, but I need to address the other side of the argument as well, especially for a group of conservative
engineers.
Whatever your motive for participating in what can only be considered a campaign of
climate engineering cover - up, rest assured that we, at GeoengineeringWatch.org, will do our best to publicly expose you (and all those like you who are participating in the
climate engineering cover - up) to populations that deserve to
know the truth
about the ongoing highly destructive and dangerous geoengineering programs that were long ago deployed without public knowledge or consent.
Douglas, the truth
about the global
climate engineering / geoengineering / solar radiation management programs will soon be
known by the masses, how do you think they will react to those who did their best to cover - up the highly toxic and environmentally devastating
climate engineering crimes?
The truth
about the ongoing
climate engineering reality will soon be
known by all, Douglas, wait and see.
No matter the outcome, their involvement in the conversation
about whether or not to conduct
climate engineering research and
about potential deployment will be instrumental in reaching well - informed, legitimate decisions.
Civil
engineers, geographers, conservationists and hydraulic
engineers are
no longer simply warning
about the hazards of
climate change.
On other occasions, if people around me would mention something
about the weather, I would try to explain what I
know is going on with the weather but I could always see the mental barrier going up as I was pointing to obvious signs of
climate engineering around us.
Given that situation, it is hard to be definitive
about the effects of solar
climate engineering,
about which we also
know relatively little.
I think the operative statement is that we simply do not
know enough
about solar
climate engineering to have much confidence in the outcome of some action taken to stop ice loss in the Antarctic.
A group of retired NASA scientists and
engineers led by Dr. Harold H. Doiron, a mechanical
engineer who is best
known for his work on eliminating unstable vibrations in liquid propellant rockets, has decided that these models simply can't be used to make rational decisions
about earth's future
climate.
if you went to a cardiologist and there were no
engineers, the cardiologist would tell you of an irregular heartbeat and say sorry there is nothing we can do.really an absurd arguement... keep talking
about the money and remember: «The US Government has spent more than $ 79 billion of taxpayers» money since 1989 on policies related to
climate change, including science and technology research, blah blah blah and you
know where this came from so i leave out the note peace, rich
I am not a «certified
climate scientist», I am an
engineer who
knows a lot
about all that energy balance thingy stuff.