Eli, how much do
you know about the logic of complex issues?
And I just eat a few:) lol they are mini after all right??? I don't
know about my logic...
Religious symbolism pointing to some ultimate context of cosmic significance, to a ground of meaning and love, to a comprehensive preservative care, is at least not incompatible with what we now
know about the logic of emergence and he nature of physical reality.
I know, you don't
know about logic.
Not exact matches
But I've been using O'Leary
logic — henceforth
known as O'
Logic ™ — ever since and I now feel much better
about myself.
We
know so little
about what there is to
know, and as our knowledge increases, so does
logic.
I have to tell you though, some of religious folks would be a very bad people if it wasn't for the «fear of god» as they already don't
know anything
about logic.
Oh, wait, they did argue
about Zeus and a flat earth, that must mean they are facts by your
logic, oh
no!!
Those pastors where talking
about the phony Christians too that are spiritually dead, not
knowing Jesus» truth, listening to false preachers preach man's
logic instead of Jesus» truth on their videos.
i do nt understand what religous people really believe is waiting for them in an afterlife when we
know for a fact that the body doesn't go there and the fact that animals apparently cant go to heaven because they have no soul is well thats just good old conceited man made rubbish that is everywhere in the bible and before i get attacked i was raised religious and got very religious for a few years till i actually thought
about it and applyed
logic to it after that the whole concept of religion made me feel sick
For too long, I elevated popular culture's opinion of me over what I
know about being fearfully and wonderfully made, over my
logic, over my own feminist and theological convictions, over my beliefs
about who I am in Christ.
This is not
about logic, it's teens doing what they want without thinking
about the potential consequences because they
know they can get an abortion and take care of it.
You'd
know that, and understand that, if you had any sense
about Logic.
«Long ago and far away there was a dot that expanded rapidly into the universe...» that in itself is a leap in
logic my friend... many assumptions made
about cosmic background radiation that we
know very little
about.
Dr. Wickman should
know better than to make unsubstantiated assumptions, exercise poor
logic, and worst of all, make statements
about scientific fields she is not educated in.
Again, you may disagree with any of the premises, you may disagree that you are dumb, that you don't
know what you are talking
about, that God exists and loves everyone, and fine, even if the
logic is perfect, the conclusion isn't valid for you, since you don't agree with the premises.
Though the Ctatholics are definetly wrong there is something very flawed with his
logic about pagan stories being bundled together they was huge part of the bible they was in many places the hebrews came and went is it possible pagans
knew the story of Abraham and Isaac of course I am sure word spread like wild fire not to mention is how do you
know if they are pagan stories or true stories that the pagans decided to tell sounds to me like he just doesn't want to be held accountable.
I
no longer agree with all I said in this article, but the point
about logic and definition I would still defend.
I want to
know if they think physicist Paul Davie is right
about the obvious creation of universe governing physical laws, if Einstein was right in a God presence and what they think
about quantum mechanics that goes back to von Neumann, where one is led by its
logic (as Wigner and Peierls were) to the conclusion that not everything is just matter in motion.
Then in the same
logic: All I have learned that i need to
know about atheist I have learned on these boards.
Just remember,
no matter where you get your news from
about the middle East, it's skewed, and you can't always apply western
logic to an Eastern culture.
By my own
logic, I reject these and believe that scientists are at least honest and forthcoming
about what they do or do not
know.
Hmm interesting — while I appreciate you leaving your comment, I'm not sure I understand your
logic of why being ancient would cause gluten to react differently — from what I
know about khorasan it is only a relative of wheat and * may * be suitable to * some * with a wheat allergy.
then why the heck we need a new striker by ur
logic if we sign a new striker sanogo won't get playing time & what
about giroud similarly signing a new cdm then what happens to arteta (who we
know can't handle big teams in big games)
Of the English core you talk
about the only regular player is Walcot, while others are back up players, so going by your
logic Arsenal is
no different from Man City, and Chelsea.
It was a strange team selection but there must have been some
logic behind it, possibly issues we do not
know about.
Nothing is
logic about you Comment, are you saying we should just live it like that until Kroenke is dead,
no no no we can use our money to pay for heart attack and failures again, we don't need Barcelona and Real Madrid to dream who we should be, can't you see how Tottenham play?
Even if I did follow your
logic about children not
knowing best and them needing parents to parent them, in this case I am the parent and I say what is best for my kids is for them to be lovingly responded to.
I assume that they
know enough basic
logic to realize that reading what lay people write
about medical literature that they haven't read makes absolutely no sense.
I've read a lot of books, because I'm a geek and want to
know what «the experts» recommend, then because I'm an engineer and a very
logic person, analyse the whole thing and the different opinions to come to a conclusion, my conclusion
about what to do.
Nice try, sidneyallen, but what you
know about government (and
logic) could be written on a pinhead.
And whereas the rest of the biological sciences can safely hide behind the behaviourist
logic that we can never
know what another organism, human or otherwise, is consciously experiencing, even asking a question
about animal welfare forces us to conclude that we must at least try to find out.
And for a vegan bodybuilder who must unfortunatelly play tetris with the food sources that he choses in order to give to his body the right ammounts of aminos, restricting SPI and soy foods so much does not make his goal any easier.There are sometimes that you need a meal thats complete with aminos and soy provides that meal with the additional benefits of lacking the saturated fats trans cholesterol and other endothelium inflammatory factors.I'm not saying that someone should go all the way to 200gr of SPI everyday or consuming a kilo of soy everyday but some servings of soy now and then even every day or the use of SPI which helps in positive nitrogen balance does not put you in the cancer risk team, thats just OVERexaggeration.Exercise, exposure to sunlight, vegan diet or for those who can not something as close to vegan diet, fruits and vegetables which contains lots of antioxidants and phtochemicals, NO STRESS which is the global killer, healthy social relationships, keeping your cortisol and adrenaline levels down (except the necessary times), good sleep and melatonin function, clean air, no radiation, away from procceced foods and additives like msg etc and many more that i can not even remember is the key to longevity.As long as your immune system is functioning well and your natural killer cells TP53 gene and many other cancer inhibitors are good and well, no cancer will ever show his face to you.With that
logic we shouldn't eat ANY ammount of protein and we should go straight to be breatharians living only with little water and sunlight exposure cause you like it or not the raise of IGF1 is inevitable i
know that raise the IGF1 sky high MAYBE is not the best thing but we are not talking
about external hormones and things like this.Stabby raccoon also has a point.And even if you still worry
about the consumption of soy... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711174.
As I suggested earlier, Hunter is correct that the moral
logic here is not sufficient, because stealing or cheating is wrong
no matter how anyone feels
about it.
«It's
about knowing the curriculum and what you want to focus on,
knowing your students really well, and thinking through a
logic train of how to progress to those really rich, deep ideas that you want to get to.
We
know virtually nothing else
about the Mazda CX - 4 at the moment, but
logic would conclude it'll be sized smack between the CX - 3 and CX - 5.
Who even
knows about Clearink??? If CLEARink can open his own «waveform table» (» look - up» table ), many CPU (or
logic board) manufacturers will support CLEARink screen and write device driver or software package, then you won't spend $ 2 million.
Plastic
Logic is
known as a low cost computer chip maker and has
about 200 million dollars kick - in by Intel and a few other venture capital firms.
James Scott Bell, My old
logic professor told me not to get upset when people misuse forms of «begs the question» since most people don't
know what it means and there's nothing to be done
about it.
It may not have quite the same resonance as William Goldman's infamous line
about the movie business — «nobody
knows anything» — but Carolyn Reidy's comment, made at a recent Book Industry Study Group meeting held in New York, that «the more we
know, the more we have to learn» is an excellent reminder that, as the redoubtable chief executive of Simon & Schuster Inc also noted, publishing has its own «peculiar
logic».
Thanks CC, I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this as I find «educated» people are the hardest ones to communicate with
about SM, they can use their knowledge (consciously or subconsciously) to duck and dodge what seems to me is the inescapable
logic of the superiority of SM in the case of most people who are in position to do it (this I
know not from technical analysis or anything, just looking at people who have as much or more income than I do, with similar expenses, but they have half the house or less and are going nowhere fast with their debt to asset ratio and their retirement savings are going to be inadequate if they don't change what they are doing).
There is no
logic to that at all and, if you think
about it, how could anyone
know how much herding instinct a young puppy will develop as it matures?
Because, based on your kind of
logic and the way you're going
about judging Star Fox Zero's controls, I could simply reply with «
No, it's just that you haven't gotten used to them yet.»
«I
knew that they were amazingly intellectually coherent and I have always thought one of the things that has interested me with certain people is that they develop a kind of internal
logic about what they do, an aesthetic
logic about what they do.»
Known for extravagant and baroque site - specific work, the Bartram's piece is McDonald's most pared - down work to date, and the clear, compact book reflects a new sort of
logic with its juxtapositions of raking photographic documentary from the performance with chapters of floss embroideries containing a minimal, unfolding narrative
about loss and the evolution of the species.
This is why it's good that Paul Krugman, among others, has pointed to the work of Martin Weitzman at Harvard, who's been making the point for awhile that the economic
logic of action on emissions comes as much from what is not
known about the worst - case risks as what is already established.
This comes
about from the natural tendency to judge
logic not by whether the steps are sound but whether the conclusions fit the «
known» facts.
«I think I understand the climate debate better than anyone, not because I
know more
about climate but because I
know more
about the
logic of complex issues.
All you demonstrated with that contribution is that you don't
know much
about formal and informal
logic.
But at some point you need to get out of this
logic chopping and tell us what you
know about the scenarios, and why they are so preposterous.