Yet we now
know about nuclear energy policy; shale gas exploration; grammar schools; housing plans; a race equality audit.
Not exact matches
Energy and Capital editor Keith Kohl tells investors what they need to
know about Iran's
nuclear lies and reveals the winners and losers in the wake of Netanyahu's grim announcement.
Giuliani says New Yorkers «have a right to
know the facts
about this important source of
energy» and that the site «is among the most thoroughly reviewed
nuclear energy facilities in the country.»
«With a scaled up solution, not only will we
no longer have to think
about the dangers of storing radioactive waste long - term, but we will have a viable solution to close the
nuclear fuel cycle and contribute to solving the world's
energy needs.
«What DOE and NRC are concerned
about are the things we don't
know about,» Julie Keys, senior project manager for the
Nuclear Energy Institute.
Lomborg claims in his rebuttal that «Holdren could find little but a badly translated word and a necessary specification for
nuclear energy production in this chapter».8 Actually, as my original critique indicated to the extent practical in the space available, and as Lomborgs rebuttal and this response make even plainer, his
energy chapter is so permeated with misunderstandings, misreadings, misrepresentations, and blunders of other sorts that it can not be considered a positive contribution to public or policy - maker understanding, notwithstanding its managing to get right a few (already well
known) truths
about the subject.
The movie also illustrates that none of its five layman «converts» to pro-nuke views
knows enough
about nuclear plants or other
energy solutions to evaluate them fairly.
Those following
energy issues might be interested to
know that there is a new techno - thriller novel
about the American
nuclear power industry, written by a longtime
nuclear engineer (me), and available at no cost on the web.
As far as is
known, the risks from this type of low level contamination are small, but as we contemplate on one hand trying to clear up all the old
nuclear sites, and on the other, building new plants, it may be wise to think
about the long term implications of relying on
nuclear energy.
As just
about everyone
knows, there are gaping chasms separating the worldviews of fossil fuel promoters,
nuclear power advocates, and renewable
energy supporters.