Sentences with phrase «know about our defence»

Don't know about his defence.

When I was first made shadow defence [secretary] I remember getting loads of questions about you know «what do you know about defence», «you know nothing about defence».

This fine set of essays charts what we know about our defence system.

Not exact matches

Another high - profile Republican, former US secretary of defence Donald Rumsfeld, liked to talk about «known unknowns».

It's hilarious that you are «projecting» (a psychological defence) your own being caught not knowing what you're talking about («The blockchain only contains Bitcoin transactions») on me.

In a 34 - page defence filed in the Federal Court in Melbourne on Monday, lawyers for Coles rejected key claims by the ACCC, which launched legal action in May, alleging that Coles used unfair tactics and misleading information to force about 200 suppliers to pay additional and ongoing rebates to participate in the program known as Active Retail Collaboration.

No but he is not the worst just think back to some of the amazing saves he has many earlier on in the season and then think about playing behind a defence like ours that has been shaky for many years

Not sure about that really... only thing Welbs can (i hope im wrong) do with his energy and running around the box is to disrupt his own team mates.Facing organised defence where players know what they are doing he can do s ## t.

This is simple a very intelligent child can solve this problem.Firstly today our keeper was very poor however i know he will come good.By the way why is Paulista no getting his chance.What i have observed about arsenal since we signed Mertesacker from day one and since he started playing is that Mertesacker hardly gets involved you will usually see him a few times because he does not want to get caught out.e has always been a weak link in the defence even in his greatest performances here.When i see us playing with a high line and he is there i always laugh.It is just a mistake waiting to happen and i can tell u that it will happen again this season.Secondly why is Ramsey Cazorla and Ozil playing in the same line - up in a 4 -5-1 formation.That is just not right though it will win you some matches due to individual brilliance.It wont work at all.Lastly the least i say about Giroud the better i am not judging him on one game.One would imagine if he was not french and like chinese will he be getting these chances under Wenger.To me he will always be an average player and i will stand by my word even if he has good games.

No player In our defence, if wenger can parade this team as our team against stoke, that means he knows nothing about football anymore.

but more importantly it should tell you that wenger no longer has a grasp on the strengths and weaknesses of his team, or, indeed, what kind of football he is trying to play... heard a lot of people waffling on about the end of tika tak... we never got there because too many first team players lack the skills to do that kind of football... ramsey walcott giroud merteshaker coquelin are not that kind of player... nor do we rapidly convert defence in to attack as we used to or press teams in their own half..

lst season at stamford bridge, was the first time i saw that 4 -1-4-1 formation being used, and for some weird reason i feel a very strange negative vibe and well all know the outcome.the manager has come back with this formation and its not yielding result, but he still sticks with it.i do nt know much about formations dear friends, but if you are playing a slow dm in arteta and a very very slow cb, then you are toast against quality teams with sound tactics.wen playing wellbeck as a lone striker, i think 4 -2-3-1, will work better, but if we have a big player like oliver (boooos), thn we can try the 4 -1-4-1, thingy cos he can hold the ball for our midfielders to run in.but on the overall, shame on wenger for not giving our defence a good cover DM.NO BODY PLAYS A SLOW DM / CB AND EXPECT TO B REGARDED AS CHAMPIONSHIP MATERIAL.IT HURTS GUYS, REALLY HURTS.

TBH, I don't know a lot about Icardi... But his goal stats are decent for a young player in Seria A's tight defence...

Well written, but I think it will fall on deaf ears, my fear is as follows, it will take a loss in money for the manager and board to change, this will only come if we finish out of the top 4, but knowing the board they would still give home a season to try again, I feel very sorry for Sanchez, he is total quality and deserves better, most of the other players look settled, turn up give70 % and get paid, no matter what level you play at you should come off the pitch thinking I gave everything, how many of our players could say that, they lack motivation, player for player we are as good if not better than athletico Madrid but they have a manger that gets 100 % out of every player, Klopp is the same, but why would they leave their clubs to come here with a boar that cares about money not entertainment, Wenger was a lucky manager he inherited a top defence now his luck has run out

The opposition defence will know about him and have to look after him.

wenger needs to broaden his thinking and horizon... and think beyond sanchez, so many players can replace him, carrasaco, even baruwa (of lipstik) whom we just saw in the emirates cup, dembele etc... i just watched liverpool trash bayern... liverpool have always has a sharp attack, now their defence seems solid... wenger is just a straight jacket, i do nt care what others are doing, i know it all coach and it will really hurt come begining of season, unless he prunes his pride and look over the wall at what his competitors are doing that is strengthing the weakness and planning ahead... our midfield was weak and indeed still is... we glad about lacazzete, but unless our defence gives 110 all games, and we look at life beyond sanchez... we will have our fellings hurt this season

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

UTD could have lost 6 - 3 to us if it wasn't for DDG, we didn't moan about our def as much when we had Seaman or Man Jens in goal, those GKs knew their job and commanded the defence.

Not very confident tonight on account of our defence and midfielders to make it worse arsene still goes on about quality in the squad, yeah quality alright only if you know how to get the best out of them unfortunately wenger doesn't that's why a lot of player's don't want to sign for arsenal

SEE ALSO: Arda Turan facts: Five things Man Utd & Chelsea fans should know about the Atletico Madrid star Liverpool: Three ways Reds could line up in 2015/16 with new signings (with and without Raheem Sterling) Manchester United dream XI: De Gea staying, # 90m trio signed in defence, Bale alongside Depay & more

we made Sunderland look like Barcelona and if not for Cech we could easily have lost the game... Flamini just good not do the job of screening our defence and if you fail to see that reality yesterday then you know eff all about football... his leg were gone, his positioning was almost always wrong, he utterly failed to break up their attack.....

Ajax do not want him on loan.He is bashed too much and i think he should leave to ajax.He may be error prone but has done his best in having to be behind some terrible defending over the years.I admire his bravery.He was 19 years when he played his first game and to me its just a matter of time before he becomes world class.The defence barely helped him in his first and second season here to be honest and he also did not help himself by making a lot of mistakes.But i believe that Szczesny will be a legendary keeper one day.He just has that kind of something i do nt know but something about him makes me feel he can be so good.He should just leave and rebuild his career at Ajax if possible.He should know that he has the potential and by getting his head in the game and focusing the sky will be the limit.

I know this sounds silly, but for me this games for me is going to be about our defence.

At last, I can point out our Defence is fine, much better than Chelsea's defence, you know, that rich club your wrote an essay about above underlining your reseDefence is fine, much better than Chelsea's defence, you know, that rich club your wrote an essay about above underlining your resedefence, you know, that rich club your wrote an essay about above underlining your resentment.

Guys i do nt know about you but i think a striker should be our priority we have the fastest defence the best keeper but we create lots of chances which go to waste Im sorry but thats how it is Giroud seems to score once per game and let it lie he does nt lead a comeback and does nt score more than two per game the pressure os on our midfield to keep creating chances then finish them

Spot on comments and we all know why they are true; because in Wenger we have a manager in charge who has a phobia about the word defence.

With Arsenal's penchant for injuries, an already injury - ravaged back - line, three - quarter of our defence (Koscielny, Sagna and Clichy) involved with another «meaningless» friendly which claimed RvP and Vermaelen last season... I'm not very excited about it and I wont celebrate it until I know TV5 is back to ensure that Arsenal's season doesn't go up in flames due to some «meaningless» friendlies!

We have known about West Ham's interest in Zabaleta since April, as the club looks to improve a porous defence that conceded 64 goals during the 2016/17 Premier League campaign.

That position defence will start with the hosting of London rivals Chelsea, and you can read everything you need to know about both sides right here.

Perhaps we're clutching at straws somewhat, as Chelsea dropping points in this fixtures does look extremely unlikely, but in football anything is possible and if West Brom can interrupt the flow of play, get right in their faces and give them something to think about with some snappy breaks out of defence then who knows.

I know you'll all say it will never happen, but look at every team to ever have won the EPL, its all about having the best defence.

That said, a combination of poor form, a defence in all sorts of bother and the absence of several key players, that could possibly include top - scorer Wayne Rooney, I know I wouldn't feel easy about sticking my hard - earned pounds on them at such a ludicrous price.

There isn't a striker in the Premier League who puts himself about like he does, and if he can cause a rift in the heart of the Stoke defence then who knows, Bolton may well prosper.

Talking about values is cheap, sticking out your political neck to try and construct these values in the actual world is expensive - saying no to corporations rather than finger - waving, creating strong laws rather than voluntary codes, recognising and defending unions as a legitimate defence of those with limited power and the strikes which go with it, being prepared to replace internal markets with internal democracies and so forth.

But for this decision to be open about this agreement, how else would we, the people of Ghana, have ever known that, for several decades, Ghana has had defence and security co-operation collaborations with the United States of America?

No it doesn't, but what people want to know about a future government is that they take defence seriously, both in terms of resources but also in the use of force.

Not only is the new defence secretary known by some Tory critics as Private Pike thanks to his lack of military experience, he has also recently acquired a second nickname — Poker — following colourful revelations about his time as a fireplace salesman in Yorkshire.

«I'm not sure Ken knows anything about defence.

«We still do not know the full facts about the money trail which led to the resignation of the Rt Hon Member for North Somerset, we do not know the true role and motivations of Mr Werritty, and we do not know who exactly in the government met Mr Werritty and whether there was any prior knowledge of the former defence secretary's activities.»

And SCL's main clients - NATO and the defence departments of its member states - have managed to get away without being asked how much they knew about what one of their key contractors was up to.

I know that he has asked the same question of my right hon. Friend the Defence Secretary, and the answer is the same: we do not consider it appropriate to talk about these plans in public, but I can assure him that arrangements are in place for any such contingency.

She spoke to Andrew Neil on the Daily Politics about currency and defence issues, claiming one benefit of independence would be «no longer having to put up with Trident being based here in Scotland».

Shadow Defence Secretary Liam Fox wanted to know about the spiritual nourishment of our Armed Forces:

The charm and frustration of Ukip is we have doctors who fancy themselves as tax experts, painters and decorators who know all about strategic defence issues, and branch chairmen, retired dentists, who understand the most intricate political solutions for the nation.

Sir Nicholas Soames, the former defence minister who is a Cameron loyalist, highlighted the Tory leadership's suspicions about Johnson when he tweeted: «Whatever my great friend Boris decides to do I know that he is NOT an outer.»

Give Mercer the defence brief, as an ex-service man he knows about the problems caused by lack of equipment, etc..

Fast - forward to» 71, where Ellsberg's leaked report («United States — Vietnam Relations 1945 - 1967») makes the front page of the New York Times, telling the world that four successive administrations had misled the American public about the war, and revealing that former secretary of defence Robert McNamara (Bruce Greenwood) «knew we couldn't win in 65 — that's six goddam years ago!»

I don't know about other Warriors games, but would it have been too much to ask to have a siege tower or catapults or castle defence segments?

It's the typical tower - defence gameplay that in this age every gamer knows about, but PixelJunk Monstersdoes it with charisma — meaning that every time you pick up the Vita and play a few rounds with Tikiman, you're always in for some unadulterated fun.

This is only possible in very limited circumstances, such as if you did not know about the decree because you did not receive the court papers and you have a valid defence to the claim.