As such, you undoubtedly
know all about religious dogma and Holy Scripture.
What would
we know about religious hymns?»
WHat is really amazing is how we now know more about a guy who is not even assured a place on the ticket, than we now
know about the religious upbringing and views of the man that is currently in the White House.
That is what
we know about the religious right: they despise God, love money and worship Satan!
I don't
know about her religious practices and I certainly do not walk in her foot steps every day of her life.
Not exact matches
It
no longer cares
about our ancient blood and
religious ties with Britain or Europe, or
about the crucial strategic roles of our European and East Asian allies.
Data brokers have been
known to build profiles of their customers» tastes by accessing information
about their education, work history,
religious or political views, relationship status, interests, hobbies, etc via apps.
I personally hear the atheists I
know complain more than the
religious people
about others talking
about their beliefs, could just be the people I
know though.
I
know almost every Army regulation
about Chaplains, Chapel's,
religious support, and etc..
The «associate professor in the Department of
Religious Studies»
knows so little
about Mormonism comparing it to Scientology (a religion?)
It's always very funny to see the
religious zealots scream
about what they «
know» their god wants, but when it's an uncomfortable contradiction then «oh god can't be understood» or «who are you to question god» (might makes right?).
Keeping in mind that believing a dead man came back to life and ascended bodily into heaven is
no more plausible than anything Mormons believe, you have to wonder what Barnum would say
about all
religious people.
No but I think you atheists stick to
religious articles so your little fantasy
about Christians can be real.These are people who have
no idea who they are..
I have to tell you though, some of
religious folks would be a very bad people if it wasn't for the «fear of god» as they already don't
know anything
about logic.
From what I little
know is that the Greeks and the Romans started their
religious philosophies with a «first god» and then wrote
about their first god's lineage trees.
I don't
know all that much
about God, but I
know this is the root of the problem with
religious people.
Did yo u
know that on everage atheists
know more
about bible then
religious people, Jews come next... catholics
know the least
about what is actualy in the bible.
It's not arrogance, it's reality... something I
know religious people don't care
about.
Most
religious people
know nothing
about their own religion which makes them complete posers.
It seems that you have filled your mind to the max of things to prove to
religious people that you
know what you are talking
about.
In other words with all the things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant
about the
religious beliefs of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information people need to
know at this particular time.
You
know you've been fully indoctrinated when you can't even conceive of someone NOT being
religious about something.
I
know that I see elements of divine around me in things and in ways that others don't, including other
religious people... And as long as different religions and even sects constantly argue
about what god truly is, and as long as they come up with different asnwers, then I have to say that the spiritual elements of our universe simply manifest differently for different folks, including not at all for some... as with those who label themselves as athiest...
Many
religious people I have talked to don't even
know much
about their faith, only what they are taught by rote.
It is simply impossible to understand a people without
knowing about their beliefs be they
religious or political.
We tend to have a basic knowledge of history and
know that there is nothing magical or special
about the supposed history of the Jews, gospels, letters, apocalyptic story (Revelations) and other materials that found their way into the Bible, in that they are largely indistinguishable from the other mythology and
religious writings of the Greco - Roman Mediterranean.
ID people
know they can't test it and that it's worthless they just don't care because ID isn't
about science, it's
about religious evangelism..
So I guess what I'm trying to say is this: there is a right way for
religious people to help those around them come to
know and follow God, should they so desire, but yelling at them
about fire and brimstone is not really acceptable or in good taste.
I
know that is not an apples to apples comparison, but since an employer is not allowed to ask
about religious preference, how are they supposed to run their business when every single decision they make might bring up issues?
its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking
about, you assume to
know what something is
about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act
no better than
religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its
about being aware of who you are?
At last someone that holds the same views
about those crazy
religious freaks trying to turn all of us into a bunch of bible preaching zombies that pray and send money to something
NO ONE has ever seen.
Unlike Superman whose creation can actually be traced back to a couple of young Jewish men in 1938 for the purpose of providing a sellable fictional story line to Detective Comics, there is no such evidence in regards to
religious belief; especially since in this case being that this is
about a God who does not want to be made
known but who would rather have us develop our faith.
These
religious retards don't
know nuthin
about common sense.
Your right there was a time that we did not
know about germs and the
religious claimed it was demons and evil spirits that made people sick.
The journal ran articles on «the
religious significance of poetry,» and others with titles like «Shall Pastors
Know Something
About Art?»
These are the folks who like to talk
about «common sense» and who, as we
know from research is common among the
religious, rely heavily on intuition aand believe all answers are intuitive.
While some scientists have expressed opinions
about the validity of
religious beliefs, I don't
know that many, if any, have attempted to prove or disprove religion using the scientific method.
In my book «
Religious Literacy,» I argued that the United States is one of the most religious countries on Earth, and yet Americans know very little about their own religions and even less about the religions o
Religious Literacy,» I argued that the United States is one of the most
religious countries on Earth, and yet Americans know very little about their own religions and even less about the religions o
religious countries on Earth, and yet Americans
know very little
about their own religions and even less
about the religions of others.
If you believe what the bible says, then surely you must
know that Jesus critiqued much
about the
religious institutions and leaders of his day.
First, its premisses concerning society and modern man are pseudoscientific: for example, the affirmation that man has become adult, that he
no longer needs a Father, that the Father - God was invented when the human race was in its infancy, etc.; the affirmation that man has become rational and thinks scientifically, and that therefore he must get rid of the
religious and mythological notions that were appropriate when his thought processes were primitive; the affirmation that the modern world has been secularized, laicized, and can
no longer countenance
religious people, but if they still want to preach the kerygma they must do it in laicized terms; the affirmation that the Bible is of value only as a cultural document, not as the channel of Revelation, etc. (I say «affirmation» because these are indeed simply affirmations, unrelated either to fact or to any scientific knowledge
about modern man or present - day society.)
i do nt understand what religous people really believe is waiting for them in an afterlife when we
know for a fact that the body doesn't go there and the fact that animals apparently cant go to heaven because they have no soul is well thats just good old conceited man made rubbish that is everywhere in the bible and before i get attacked i was raised
religious and got very
religious for a few years till i actually thought
about it and applyed logic to it after that the whole concept of religion made me feel sick
But, most atheists and agnostics (especially if they don't come from a
religious tradition) don't really
know anything
about the Bible either.
I asked him
about his college days and whether they had involved a
religious upset, and when he answered with a decisive «
No,» I inquired the explanation.
And those who care
about religious liberty should
know at least as much
about that case, McCullen v. Coakley, as they do
about the more narrowly decided case with which the Court ended its term.
We get to read
religious views from people who
know nothing of religion and scientific views from people who have no clue
about science.
sounds
religious to me (yes, im talking
about the scientist that tells you we
know the age of the universe..
I don't have a problem with the general idea that there is much we don't
know about the universe and reality, the problem is when people... «spiritual» or «
religious»....
The reasoning goes something like this; the truth is written in the bible and we
know this because it is written in the bible, of course you could say the same thing
about any other
religious tome.
The word «God» is irrelevant to the
religious problem unless the word is used to refer to whatever in truth operates to save man from evil and to the greater good
no matter how much this operating reality may differ from all traditional ideas
about it (MUC 12).
I don't care if people agree with my
religious beliefs, what I do care
about is that they
know I don't sacrifice babies or engage in homilies to Satan during ritual.