Sentences with phrase «know are problematic»

They can also help you avoid marketing tactics or campaigns that they know are problematic, or point you toward new, useful tools they've discovered.

It encourages students to reflect on the methods used to «recruit» new followers and consider whether or no they are problematic.

Not exact matches

«We don't know exactly what McGahn said, but the mere fact that he put a stop to that letter is another piece of evidence that Mueller could use to say, «Donald Trump was warned by the White House counsel that this was a problematic step and decided to do it anyway,»» former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti told Business Insider in September.

Since interpersonal interactions can be problematic, he's a big believer in full disclosure, so that supervisors and co-workers know what to expect.

«That's problematic because the service provider doesn't know how complicated the install is so they have to quote, literally, the highest price they can to cover all their contingencies.»

And, as many now know, the technology behind Theranos was more problematic than initially thought, which has led to a dramatic dive in the company's market valuation.

Given the number who know someone who has lost a job to this program, the optics are very problematic,» said Forum Research President, Dr. Lorne Bozinoff.

If you know that these problematic behaviors are indicative of later troubles from the beginning, you'll be able to manage them better.

«To the extent that the EU has barreled forward with consent being the key, in this environment when we can't really know what's being collected about us all the time and what's being used, putting the onus on a person to use judgment to allow or disallow something could be problematic,» she said.

The increased corporate tax rate, the increased carbon tax (and its changed status of being no - longer - revenue - neutral), and the increases to personal income tax rates at management and professional - earning levels are all problematic for the business community.

The idea behind the piece is to essentially make the case that 21 books — considered classics in many literary circles — are either no longer relevant or problematic.

For me, living, praying, reading, writing and living Hebrew Bible as a black woman is no more problematic than being a black woman in the Americas.

As community activists know, «problematic people» can't be organized.

People the church do not know are much more problematic.

For example, knowing based simply on «having had X experience» can be problematic.8 There are no guarantees that unreflected experiences, whether from the center or from the margins, will yield up liberatory insights.

Man is no longer problematic for himself, and the wonder at man is simply wonder at the universe as a whole.

One no longer need do and think just what had been done and thought, and the mythical meanings by which man had lived so long were now problematic rather than simply given.

If the nature of belief itself is problematic for you then how do you «know» what is true?

In any event, in a closely parallel discussion of the very same question, of how problematic terms like «know» or «love» as applied to God are to be classified, he in no way appeals to psychicalism, but argues instead that, although they are «in such application not literal in the simple sense in which «relative» can be,» they nevertheless «may be literal if or in so far as we have religious intuition» (1970a, 155).

If the claim that God must somehow be experienced directly and universally already appears problematic, given the sheer fact of non - and even a-theistic religions and philosophies, how much more - problematic must it be when it becomes the claim that God is everywhere consciously known!

From a Wesleyan perspective, this is problematic because it can lead to what Wesley called solafidianism in which the Christian life enters a kind of stasis where the believer, having embraced Christ in faith, need go no farther.

The text continues to hold on to the temple as a central source of hope for Israel, but it also knows that temple hope is profoundly problematic because it makes assumptions about God's availability which crowd God and can not be sustained.

The divine attributes of actuality, immanence and transcendence are not problematic in any way: all of them characterize the God in two natures for which Whitehead is so well known.

That is why, perhaps, it is impossible for Garrow to imagine a principled opposition to the reformers whose lives he chronicles, who proceed as if an abortion were no more morally problematic than an appendectomy.

Without casting Enlightenment rationalism as categorically evil, Wright details some of the problematic consequences of Enlightenment assumptions regarding the biblical text: false claims to absolute objectivity, the elevation of «reason» («not as an insistence that exegesis must make sense with an overall view of God and the wider world,» Wright notes, «but as a separate «source» in its own right»), reductive and skeptical readings of scripture that cast Christianity as out - of - date and irrelevant, a human - based eschatology that fosters a «we - know - better - now» attitude toward the text, a reframing of the problem of evil as a mere failure to be rational, the reduction of the act of God in Jesus Christ to a mere moral teacher, etc..

Aquinas knows that his attempted distinction is problematic: in A. 13, I answer that... (very end), he says: «Nevertheless, because characteristic dispositions are the sources of acts, we sometimes apply the word conscience to the initial characteristic dispositions from nature, namely, synderesis.»

I am of the opinion that eating the same foods each and every day can be problematic, no matter how healthy you believe those foods to be.

The term «FODMAP» is an acronym for a collection of sugars (also known as short chain carbohydrates) that have been identified as being problematic to certain individuals, in eliciting IBS - type symptoms.

Remember if you aren't at the head of the class when it comes to the development of young talent, which means eyes on the ground everywhere, a vast array of connections with soccer associations throughout Europe and beyond and a manager willing to properly train and play said blue chippers, (like the 90s Arsenal or clubs like the modern day Monaco and Dortmund) you need to spend to win... anything in between is highly problematic... failure to make the necessary changes leaves you in the proverbial «no man's land» and that is currently where we reside... it's difficult to get out of this rut... just ask either of the Milan teams... next step after that is being known as a «seller», which could be us already if and when Sanchez leaves... there are only two teams that have worn this moniker in recent times and had some decent success and that is Athletico Madrid and Dortmond, which only occurred when they both brought in new, charismatic leaders in Simmone & Klopp... the odds that Wenger could conjure up the magic to repeat the performances of a bygone era are incredibly low, so why prolong the agony... he's not willing to create the hierarchy necessary to go the youth route and he's unwilling to put his team's potential success ahead of his job security by laying it on the line with Moustache, so it's time to place all your chips in the middle or go gently into that good night

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

It's worth remembering, both with the Tigers and with basically every other major deal we're talking about here, that teams signed these contracts knowing that eventually, they'd be problematic.

Combine that with a defense that is no longer a major liability — the run defense is still problematic, but «problematic» is better than «woeful» — there's a blueprint in place for winning this game.

Instead of planning for the inevitable for years we ostriched our way through one problematic season after another, the club hierarchy hanging all hopes, responsibilities and blame on one man's shoulders and failing or unwilling to acknowledge that he himself is no longer capable of lucid objective assessment of the team's performance.

International Babywearing Week will not promote events or groups that are known to discriminate against others or behave in an otherwise problematic way.

When we know who they are spending time with it helps us know when to step in to diffuse any problematic behaviors or actions before they start.

Because organic mattresses are not made with any harmful toxins or chemicals, you can rest easy knowing that your child is not breathing in anything that can be problematic to them.

You know, so much of what we do in the United States is to assume that we're supposed to get so much joy and happiness and meaning from our marriages, and that's really a very problematic idea - this whole soul - mate marriage idea - that our spouses are supposed to be not only hot sex partners but our therapist, our confidant, our sport partners and we're way too dependent on our spouses for meaning.

STACY SPENSLEY: I would agree you know, after a couple of months he got he didn't quite have that same sucking needs to what was quite was problematic for him I mean he wasn't quite as gassy and burp as much but you know I still pump an extra 12 to 15 ounces a day at most day so, we'll see.

We already know how problematic it is to allow boys to get away with negative behaviours by uttering falsities like «boys will be boys,» so why would we ever say it in front of our own kids?

My mother has food intolerance issues so I know how problematic they can be.

Yes we have a huge problem of no consequences for problematic behaviors because our superintendent does not like conflict, and so the Food serive director knows this and just does as she pleases for she feels no threat of a consequence It is very frustrating and extremely disturbing.

I don't know when things picked up again with breastfeeding, but today breastfeeding in public in Italy is not as problematic as it is in the U.S..

Knowing ahead of time what issues might be problematic gives you both a chance to plan and prepare to make things go smoother.

Subsequently, by virtue of defining that an adult and infant are unable to safely sleep on the same surface together, such as what occurs during bedsharing, even when all known adverse bedsharing risk factors are absent and safe bedsharing practices involving breastfeeding mothers are followed, an infant that dies while sharing a sleeping surface with his / her mother is labeled a SUID, and not SIDS.26 In this way the infant death statistics increasingly supplement the idea that bedsharing is inherently and always hazardous and lend credence, artificially, to the belief that under no circumstance can a mother, breastfeeding or not, safely care for, or protect her infant if asleep together in a bed.27 The legitimacy of such a sweeping inference is highly problematic, we argue, in light of the fact that when careful and complete examination of death scenes, the results revealed that 99 % of bedsharing deaths could be explained by the presence of at least one and usually multiple independent risk factors for SIDS such as maternal smoking, prone infant sleep, use of alcohol and / or drugs by the bedsharing adults.28 Moreover, this new ideology is especially troubling because it leads to condemnations of bedsharing parents that border on charges of being neglectful and / or abusive.

Indeed, if a baby dies in what is defined as an «unsafe sleep environment,» such as all non-crib sleeping deaths, those babies are no longer regarded as SIDS deaths, when in fact, they could be.9 More problematic is the fact that the SUID diagnosis is being applied abundantly in cases where an infant is found dead sleeping next to a parent on the same surface, no matter what the social or physical circumstances.26

This is particularly problematic because we know that — to abuse the metaphor — «trickle down» or supply - side economics doesn't actually work.

It is not as though Pakistan and Bangladesh had no chance of survival no matter how problematic their origins.

The anti-hunting organisations, being more obsessed with banning hunting than improving animal welfare, know that proving hunting to be cruel in a court of law is problematic and consequently they oppose a far better wild animal welfare law.

«[Employers] know there's another class of staffers that are complete mercenaries, and that's most of them, and they will do whatever they can do to protect their boss at any cost, and they have no line,» she said, adding: «Showing a moral line is problematic, because it sort of flags you as someone who could, in a certain set of ethical circumstances, turn on the employer.

I doubt that she knows of anything in particular that is problematic.