We know constitutional protection extends to impoverished people accessing the courts, but now we know it extends to the middle class too.
Not exact matches
But now the law has been federally enshrined by the Securing the
Protection of our Enduring and Established
Constitutional Heritage Act, otherwise
known as the Speech Act and Rory's help is getting serious recognition in the new book, «You Can't Read This Book: Censorship in an Age of Freedom.»
There is no line in the Constitution that reads, «ATTN: ANTONIN SCALIA JUST SO YOU
KNOW WOMEN ARE AFFORDED THE SAME
CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS AS EVERYONE ELSE FYI» and «This is not, of course, a surprising take on the Fourteenth Amendment from Scalia, but it's always nice to see him talk about what an asshole he is.»
Here is the federal government's position: «[T] he defendant's advocacy of jury nullification, directed as it is to jurors, would be both criminal and without
Constitutional protections no matter where it occurred» [emphasis added].