Not exact matches
Sian Porter, Chairman of the BDA's Communications Board said: «With so many people online claiming to be «experts» in the field of food and nutrition, it is vital that people have a point of contact where they
know that information being given out and promoted is
credible, evidenced - based and based on solid scientific
research, as opposed to personal opinions and people trying to sell you all kinds of products.
Any person casually acquainted with the theories of conflict studies and
research knows that when individuals or groups in conflict do not have
credible facts to defend their side of disagreement or conflict issues, they resort to odious personal attacks and / or the assassination of the character, honour and integrity of their opponents as a cover for their inability to rebut the objective issue in conflict.
Students in many cases do not approach Internet
research appropriately and they do not
know how to assess whether the source is adequate or
credible.
How much spare time each week do you have to read all the relevant
credible published science papers already available for years, and read existing reports by govt / science / economic / agri bodies on the subject matters, and read the state of current
research /
know how of existing anecdotal narrow focused regional / local analysis and the opinions of experts in their particular field... and then deeply think about all that and come to a rational and reasonable conclusion on it all?
As explained by certified career counselor Susan Guarneri, «With more and more employers and recruiters turning to LinkedIn to
research candidates for their job openings, building and maintaining a professional,
credible and persuasive LinkedIn profile is
no longer optional if you want to fast - forward your job search.»
Lamb, a well -
known and
credible researcher (although he has written soft papers like this article all too often since, apparently, being given fatherhood promotion marching orders from the federal government), squirrels out of being called on his sleight of hand by setting up as his precursor alibi, that he did this in this article in this way (without citation to supportive
research findings) in order to «facilitate readability» and that «readers can study the cited articles for references to the primary literature.»