While we don't
know for certain who was behind the wheel of that other ship, it appeared to be Thanos.
The movie capitalizes on the audience's inability to
know for certain who's OK and who's dangerous.
JAMESTOWN - Today is the day some residents in the city of Jamestown will
know for certain who their next representative will be on the city council.
While a woman can
know for certain who fathered her child, a man can never be 100 % certain whether he is the biological father.
So, all of you that have the nerve to bad - mouth the Lord and the existance of His Kingdom... you might want to research a bit on the subject of «generational curses» because if not for yourselves, for the sake of your children and there children, you might want to
know for certain Who or What you're talking about just in case.
SoftBank knew at the time that the brothers had already retained the executive search firm Spencer Stuart, and that the firm had narrowed the search to a few finalists, but interestingly, SoftBank did not
know for certain who the new CEO would be when the term sheet was signed.
Bishop said... «Though we are not yet at the point of
knowing for certain who did this horrible crime it would come as no surprise to any intelligent person if the individual or individuals responsible are the nutters with the NRA and the Tea Party Republicans.»
Though we are not yet at the point of
knowing for certain who did this horrible crime it would come as no surprise to any intelligent person if the individual or individuals responsible are the nutters with the NRA and the Tea Party Republicans.
But when he called her name,
she knew for certain who he was.
While nobody
knows for certain who will win the 2010 elections, the western Queens races for state Senate are marked by clear leads of the incumbents over their challengers when it comes to raising and spending money.
«Moreover, since the judging is done remotely and virtually — via the technology that allows the corporate online learning industry to thrive — no judge
knows for certain who any other judge is.
Now if only
I knew for certain who will find that welcome in Brooklyn.
Jonathan Nuechterlein, chair of the communications, privacy and internet law practice group at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, said that without
knowing for certain who Genachowski's replacement will be, it makes it difficult to predict what policy changes if any will occur.
Not exact matches
For evidence of artists who've been able to maintain their credibility while licensing their music for commercials, you might look no further than a certain Canadian songstress who got a «big break» when her song was featured in an iPod commercial in 20
For evidence of artists
who've been able to maintain their credibility while licensing their music
for commercials, you might look no further than a certain Canadian songstress who got a «big break» when her song was featured in an iPod commercial in 20
for commercials, you might look
no further than a
certain Canadian songstress
who got a «big break» when her song was featured in an iPod commercial in 2007:
«
No matter what they do in their careers — go off to a private equity firm, to consulting, go work
for a big company, be in the marketing unit at Merck — they're almost
certain to be involved in launching new businesses or new products, or working with people
who are,» Eisenmann says.
Do you
know of people
who rent a car
for just the weekend or
certain days to drive on the side?
The United States Department of Agriculture has a
no - down - payment option
for anyone
who qualifies and
who buys in
certain rural (and some suburban) areas using USDA loans.
Atheists: I
know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking
for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing
certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he
knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species,
who created the mosquitos that way?
So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion)
who loves me and
knows me and cares
for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating
certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans
who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».
I
know of several straight couples
who were not allowed to marry in a
certain church
for whatever reason that church decides, that will not change.
That expression most likely originated at John 11: 49 - 51 «But a
certain one of them, Caiaphas,
who was high priest that year, said to them: «You do not
know anything at all, and you do not reason out that it is to your benefit
for one man to die in behalf of the people and not
for the whole nation to be destroyed.»
And to say that Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older
known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that
for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are
known to have been placed in the Bible first or
known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity
who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those
who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.
Confession time here: although I don't usually end up at places such as drunken parties, stripper bars and porn shops while hanging out with friends, since those activities and places hold little appeal
for me, I
know I need to stay away from
certain «religious» people, those
who seem to love only themselves and
who seem hell - bent on being nasty to people they describe as «sinners», supposedly in the name of truth - telling.
One day I sat in his office while he proofread the bulletin and asked him if he
knew anything about a
certain man
who attended the church
for whom I had no contact information.
I think anyone
who claims to
know for certain there is a god is completely delusional, because we just don't
know.
To
know that
certain things trigger us, to
know that what we can bear and what we can not, to
know who is safe and
who is not, to
know where we are treasured and cared
for instead of viewed as liabilities, to
know what we experienced was real and it was not our fault, to
know we are not forgotten by God, to
know our unsurpassing worth and belovedness.
I
know people
who for personal reasons are
for or against
certain religious / social / political issues
who migrated to religious groups which identify as Christian (and agree with these peoples» personal opinions) so they presumably might have an ultimate authority to support their opinions.
And should one run the risk of losing faith by examining its true foundations, he is
certain to be chilled by the dictum, in Hebrews 6:4 - 6, that «It is impossible
for those
who were once enlightened... if they fall away, to renew them again...» Those
who originated a religion based on deception and delusion clearly
knew that if the conditioning broke down or wore off, it could not work again.
Never forget that the devout wise man wins his most beautiful of all victories, when the powerful one
who had persecuted him wishes, so to speak, to release him, and the wise man replies: «I can not unconditionally wish to be released,
for I can not
know for certain that the persecution might not be good
for me.»
I would try to gently point out that I had 32 more years of experience in the word than she, & shed a tear
for the trials I
knew she soon would face... beginning the journey to become less
certain of WHAT I
know & fare more
certain of
WHO I
know.
To those of you
who ask why atheists and believers continue in this debate (despite the innocuous claim that neither can be
known for certain) is that those
who do NOT believe simply want to live in peace.
How does anyone
know for certain that the universe ceases to exist when they die, even if that cessation is only applicable to the one
who has died?Without verifiable objective proof, how does Concert in an Egg
know that upon his death he will not immediately enter a new dimension in which he has become a Klingon warrior?
No, there will be
no excuse
for any man, because God has put in every human heart
certain knowledge of Himself, so that by that knowledge man would be lead to seek to
know Him more, but those
who by love of their own sins, their self will, and pride and rebellion that's in their hearts have extinguished that knowledge written on their consciences... So what ever comes to those
who reject it, it is their own doing... George Carlin
knows that now very well.
No don't get me wrong, you were born a
certain way, then you change
for atheism, you're the one
who have been brainwashed.
... If those of us
who have
known a school like Wyvern dared to speak the truth, we should have to say that [homosexuality] was, in that time and place, the only foothold or cranny left
for certain good things.
And this is why we turn the corner from assessment of the atheist complaint and his own solution to the problem to actually advocating
for God: theism — particularly, those
who say, «
know for certain that Jesus is both Lord and Christ» — have an obligation to speak to the problem of evil not merely from a philosophic standpoint, but from an existential standpoint.
Who can
know for certain.
We have
known for a long time that the ancient Israelite believed that through
certain actions or rites he was able to be present at, and actually share in, the events of the past which had created his people's life and thus had made him what as a member of that nation he was: a man
who belonged to «the chosen people of God».
And the same should go
for anyone
who says they are saved if they are sinning and letting everyone
know it, which includes all sexual immorality, including having sex before a couple is married, drunkards, slanderers, gossips, thieves, swindlers, idolators, adulterers, and men
who have sex with other men, etc... So ultimately, many Jesus followers accept
certain sin of all types because they care more about what the world thinks, than what God thinks.
I have never met an atheist
who claims to
know for certain whether there are any gods.
I do
know one thing
for certain: it is a lot easier to pay
for all the social programs when everyone
who is able to work has a job than it is when we have high unemployment and a runaway deficit.
We
know nothing
for certain regarding the conduct of his trial,
for the Evangelists had no one to rely on
who had been an eyewitness of the proceedings.
Anyone
who's talked to me about desserts, so pretty much anyone
who's ever met me,
knows one thing
for certain: this girl loves dirt cake.
It is difficult
for someone
who does not have any food allergies / sensitivities to understand this — making yourself more educated may give you a better understanding of how some people respond to
certain foods — only an intelligent person would
know better than to reply with such an insensitive response.
Yesterday when I get to visit my childhood friend Shaina,
who have been long living in some parts of South East Asian nation, I was pretty amazed to
know how different country prepared
certain ingredients or food
for that matter, on their table.
Being around him was like coming up
for a breath of fresh air — and I'm fairly
certain that anyone
who was lucky enough to
know him would wholeheartedly agree with that statement.
As the restaurant critic
for LA Weekly, there are three things I
know for certain: (1) L.A. is arguably the most interesting place to eat in America right now; (2) much of our most remarkable dining happens in places that are hard to infiltrate and understand — even
for those of us
who live here; and (3) this is particularly true of the San Gabriel Valley (the SGV), the 284 - mile swath of land that lies to the east of the city and holds the most thrilling international eating in America.
For those that have suggested The Lovely Pantry to friends / family who are looking for meal ideas, have an interest in Jamaican cuisine, or who are just wanting to know how to use a certain ingredient... I appreciate y
For those that have suggested The Lovely Pantry to friends / family
who are looking
for meal ideas, have an interest in Jamaican cuisine, or who are just wanting to know how to use a certain ingredient... I appreciate y
for meal ideas, have an interest in Jamaican cuisine, or
who are just wanting to
know how to use a
certain ingredient... I appreciate you!
It works
for me, because if I tried to restrict
certain foods from my diet I would definitely turn into a dietary rebel... you
know, someone
who eats all the things that they're «not supposed to eat».
Whether he deserves Heisman consideration is up
for debate, and
who knows if he will be able to keep up this production in the future, but one thing is
certain, Johnny Football can play.