What
I know from scientific studies, study after study, and clinical experience, and teaching is that the woes and challenges are not unique.
Not exact matches
Before Islam they worship idols After worshiping the one absolute God Before Islam they didn't
know Jesus or Mary or any prophets After Islam who deny Jesus or Mary become blasphemer Before no payers no charity no family relation After Islam it become must Before Islam us - u-ry and slavery adultery was common After Islam got forbidden Before Islam women has no value and all her property to her husband After Islam become her own she can do what she like within Islamic laws Before Islam the girls - child were buried alive After Islam no girls - child were buried alive Before Islam no laws or guidance to people After Islam established the laws or guidance to people (sharia) Before Islam tribes killing each others After Islam they became brothers Before Islam there was no education After Islam became must and first word came to Muhammad
from the angle was (read) Before Islam no
scientific study After Islam seculars in chemistry and math the no. 1234 are Arabic and innovated the ZERO Before Islam they were tribes After Islam became empire
from Spain to china And More.......
I'd love to
know where you plucked your figures
from, because most
scientific studies seem to suggest that the majority (between 60 % and 80 % depending on the
study) of the population are actually bise.xual in that they are attracted to members of both se.xes (although a large majority of these people never cross into acting on any same - s.
My own inadequate summary of the process conceptuality intrigued them, and it was fortunate that there were present some who were well -
known as experts in their own fields of
study and who therefore could be given as suitable references for further information about the specifically
scientific application of the principles I had discussed
from the philosophical side.
No,
scientific studies prove that consistent happiness comes
from GOING for a goal.
This
scientific study only confirms what water birthing mothers
know from experience.
We
know from emerging
scientific study that the energy, the potent essence, of thought and heartfelt concern does indeed travel across time and space to reach the ones for whom we are directing our attention.
Apart
from soothing and comforting your baby, you'll be glad to
know that the gliding motion offers some benefit as a spinning / rocking exercise, which has been shown in
scientific studies to help.
Since the few
studies GFI cites are
from lesser
known medical journals, and even those
studies don't fully back up their claims, one must wonder whether they are citing all the information they view as being «friendly» while ignoring the bulk of
scientific research.
«A person who
studies scientific books with a view of
knowing the real facts ought to turn himself into an opponent of everything that he
studies; he should thoroughly assess its main as well as its margin parts, and oppose it
from every point of view and in all its aspects.
Repeatedly losing and regaining weight,
known as weight cycling or yo - yo dieting, may increase the risk of death
from heart disease among postmenopausal women who were of normal weight at the start of the
study, according to research presented at the American Heart Association's
Scientific Sessions 2016.
A team of researchers
from several academic institutions — including the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Yale University, University of Chicago, the American Center for Mongolian
Studies, and the National Museum of Mongolia — used a
scientific dating technique
known as radiocarbon dating to estimate the spread of domestic horse ritual at deer stones and khirigsuurs.
The
study, published online March 31 in Journal of Archaeological Science, produces
scientific estimates of the age of horse bones found
from archaeological sites belonging to a culture
known as the Deer Stone - Khirigsuur Complex.
Not trying to be confrontational, i love Dr.Greger, but just for the sake of
scientific truth, this
study is a cohort of 43,960 men, so idk how can you draw causality
from that, but more importantly, how do you
know its the protein since it's just a follow up?
Setting the fact that the bias
from big pharma (which we
know include / control / owns dairy industry etc.) is real and even documented and not just potential, how can you compare the «potential» bias of somebody who has very high economic interest in having a specific result coming out of the
study with that of somebody who is simply following a related social,
scientific, religious, pratical etc. pattern?
So what the science tells us is that there truly is no real division between the body and the mind and emotions, it's all part of the same web, and we
know this
from the research
studies that have been done, groups at Harvard, Johns Hopkins, a lot of the big, very reputable universities are now actually doing research on this, and there are even journals,
scientific and medical journals exploring what we call psychosomatic medicine, in other words the placebo effect.
No, that isn't a statistic
from some
scientific study, but let's all agree it's true.
And while specific pheromones are
known to trigger specific responses in animals
from bees to squid, scientists have yet to isolate them in humans, and according to Smithsonian Magazine, a review of
scientific literature on the
study of pheromones «found that most research on the topic was subject to major design flaws.»
The 1954 monster - horror Creature
from the Black Lagoon was a huge influence: in that film, an aquatic monster
known as Gill - Man becomes fascinated with a female character called Kay, who's part of a
scientific expedition whose aim it is to capture or kill the monster and
study its breathing.
First, a caveat: Although we
know a great deal
from rigorous research about what distinguishes high - performing
from low - performing schools, much less
scientific study has been conducted to show how struggling schools become effective ones.
The one - size - fits - all reference ranges make even less sense when you consider that we
know from decades - old
scientific studies that age affects thyroid levels.
Some latest
scientific studies (just do a quick search) are showing that our bodies do not
know how to burn fat, having had it removed
from our diets for the last 50 yrs or so.
This past summer, a disconcerting new
scientific study by the climate scientist Michiel Schaeffer and colleagues — published in the journal Nature Climate Change — suggested that
no matter how quickly we cut this pollution, we are unlikely to keep the seas
from climbing less than five feet.
Peter Ridd
from James Cook University goes further, saying: «We can
no longer trust the
scientific organisations like the ARC (Australian Research Council) Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef
Studies.
But by bringing in real experts who actually
study this, and not a hodge podge of those who ran to it
from other disciples (or outside science) because of ideological drive and who fundamentally don't
know the issue and, in further flourishes of rhetoric, represent them to the world as «large lists,» and denounce the basic consensus - as Curry has erroneously bought into — implicitly or directly calling the National Academy of Sciences, a stodgy conservative organization that by it's nature (and the nature of caution in
scientific assertion) understates, part of the large plot or hoax..
Lambing rates in sheep and weight - gain rates in a variety of domestic animals could be measured and compared near and away
from turbines; no
scientific studies have been done on domestic animals so far as I
know.