Sentences with phrase «know if these scenarios»

Since you do not KNOW if my scenario is incorrect, you do not KNOW if your beliefs in that case are negatively effecting others.

this is related to the fundamental inability to know the future, and know if all scenario's are properly covered.

«Future LIGO observing runs will tell us much more about the universe's population of black holes, and it won't be long before we'll know if the scenario I outline is either supported or ruled out,» Kashlinsky said.

Take our survey below and let us know if these scenarios have ever applied to you.

I don't know if the scenario is the same since they released it at the same time as 7 ″ and 8.9 ″ models.

I'd like to know if this scenario is legal: Walk in a casino and buy chips with a credit card for the maximum limit on that credit card.

Not exact matches

Of course, we don't know how quickly the P / E will fall to 17, the market's «Appointment in Samarra» scenario if the cost of capital is really a real 6 %.

The reality is that if the worst - case scenario unfolds, and Trump not only scraps NAFTA but erects a thick wall, no one really knows how bad things could get.

But shielding your systems won't do much good if, in the worst - case scenario, they no longer exist.

Instead of warning her about strangers, bring up scenarios («What would you do if a man you don't know offers you candy and a ride home?»)

[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?

Customers love clean bathrooms, and if restrooms are unkempt, it creates a no - return scenario.

If you choose to invest yourself, the solution to knowing nothing is to create your very own «Hedge Fund» i.e. a portfolio of diversified, non-correlated assets, hedged to perform in all scenarios.

No different than my rambling post agreeing with him and providing even more real life human scenarios that can evoke strong emotions, that can easily cause someone to either A: Seek out religion, even if it's only for some semblance of accepttion and / or explanation of the unknown, or B: If they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasif it's only for some semblance of accepttion and / or explanation of the unknown, or B: If they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasIf they already have a religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasm.

I'm saying if you don't know at least one of the parties involved, or have some evidence, like say the Rice video, and there's not reliable reporting like developed in the Driscoll scenario, let's just stop being the Christian paparazzi.

It is true, we are still investigating what caused the big bang, and we don't know if another big bang may be in our future, but just like a CSI and a blood splattered wall, the evidence is there and we need to follow it, not start inventing scenarios as to how it might have been the butler or the husband or the wife did it when there is no physical evidence to indicate thus.

I don't know if Stephen King ever wrote such a scenario into any of his books (I don't remember any), but if he or any other author DID happen to write such a tale into his / her book, would he / she be then incontrovertibly referencing the bible?

With this combination of visibility and the ability to take action, Ben E. Keith will be able to respond preemptively to cost issues, know which freight it should manage versus suppliers, plan for «what - if» scenarios and continue to provide quality fresh product with higher inventory turns.

We looked at a lot of scenarios and knew that if a guy won twice, he'd basically have it locked up.

I don't know, but for the past 8 years, hundreds if not thousands of basketball players have been eligible, and none have approached his value, this suggests that the odds of improving are sufficiently close to zero so as to rule out that scenario; ditto Kevin Durant.

If you and your enemy know about your defense, the whole scenario is change, like last year barsa problem without GK.

I think we all know that Jack Wilshere will be moving on for a massive signing on fee elsewhere, and if his mate Aaron Ramsey doesn't re-sign either we are likely to see him sold as well, which is a much more likely scenario than selling Bellerin.

Here is the scenario you all know: — By Jan our injury list will look shorter and shorter — By Jan Arsenal starts to perform better — «We believe we have the quality and we are already strong enough and we don't need to sign new players» Wenger — Next press conference «We are working 24 hrs a day to find quality players and if we find one we will do it» Wenger, and he will never find any — kim kallstrom type at best — Ooooops, bad luck, bad luck, injuries hit again... — Don't worry AKB we will finish no lower than 4th...

Nightmare scenario No Sanchez deal... Lose him for free No Ozil deal... Lose him for free No worthy replacements... Wenger extends contract another 2 years Most of us are laughing at Evans2Arsenal but our current back 4 aren't better than he is... Bottomline is: Even if Messi and Ronaldo joined the team... With Wenger at the helm we're going Nowhere

I don't know if I could find a worse scenario then taking these three guys in 1 / 2/3....

Alexis will know better than us what the club can or can not afford and if the club wont meet the players somewhere in the middle then I refer to the above scenario.

In the other scenario, we have to determine if the culpable party deserves to get a buttball to avenge a teammate who is no longer a teammate.

If we want to win the league, we are clearly 2 or 3 «top players» or «very good players» short... Since we all know this is not going to happen, I will assume that option one is the most possible scenario.

If Grubi is part of a best case scenario, Holtby is no longer the starting goaltender anyway from here on out.

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

Happy with our stance no risk no reward, and if the worst case scenarios as you say happen then so be it, I won't dwell on it I just want Every player to give everything he has to the shirt, a desire to win and that's all season long no more ups and downs.

We know he wants to play every minute, yet his ego is too big to comprehend the likely scenario that if he were to move to another club, he would NOT be the center of attention all the time, likely, and he definitely would not play every minute / game elsewhere.

maybe you don't understand that Wenger's words are simply an attempt to recover some of the market value that was lost due to the way they have mishandled his contract negotiations, which means that everyone, once again, knows that we have little to no leverage when it comes to negotiating a transfer... much like we did with RVP, when we sold the EPL trophy to ManU for less than $ 25 million... any reputable team with a sporting director would never have allowed this situation to occur again and if they had heads would roll... if handled correctly the worst case scenario would have seen us get a minimum of $ 65 million for a player of his ilk in the present economic climate and we could have used those funds to purchase the best available striker in the early days of the transfer window... just imagine what outsiders must think about the state of our team if all you did was read the headlines... sadly, things might just might be worse than they think

That mistake up north should be just as damaging as if against madrid using said scenario, simply because we know it ai nt nor is it going to be a one off.

Best case scenario is if Almunia decides to stay and fights for the Nos 1 shirt.

Of course, it's impossible to prepare for every possible scenario, but if a woman knows in advance that breastfeeding jaundice is a normal occurrence and isn't always a cause for concern, then perhaps she can make better informed choices with regard to her child's care.

Some of our best assistants simply can't handle the unknown: not knowing when or if they will be called to a birth, not knowing what clinical scenario they may face and how they may respond, not knowing when the right time to eat or sleep is, and even, not knowing if all their sacrifice will be appreciated or invite criticism.

If you are attempting to get some work done in your home office or workshop and are struggling to see clearly what you are doing because of poor lighting, you will know what a difference that scenario makes to your productivity levels and mood.

Unsurprisingly known as «undersupply,» this is one of the most stressful scenarios any new mom can go through if she wanted to exclusively breastfeed her baby.

One important thing that applies to all of the below scenarios: no matter how short your flight is, if you are an exclusive pumper, I would strongly recommend that you carry your pump on.

If artificially sweetened chocolate milk can still be called «chocolate milk,» without a qualifier such as «reduced sugar» or «reduced calorie,» parents will not know that the product contains an artificial sweetener unless they are in the cafeteria at the time of meal service and are able to read the ingredient label — an unlikely scenario.

No, you said if we want to promote hospital births as the best scenario, we need to focus on changing some of the ways hospitals treat births, and to illustrate that used one story where an issue was caught without any problem, and another where you had the birth you wanted in a hospital.

At present, it's not known if the net risks of the «primal sleep scenario» are any greater than the net risks of using a cot or crib.

(If you're a parent, you know how fun that scenario can be.)

The reason they are doing it is because there was a family there whose baby was born stillborn and if you kind of wrap your head around this scenario, obviously didn't know that her baby was going to be born stillborn, there is a lot of trauma there.

While it would be great if everyone used cloth diapers, we know this is an unlikely scenario, whether its due to busy schedules.

The EU commits to trying to avoid a chaotic no - deal scenario, although it says «it will prepare itself to be able to handle the situation also if the negotiations were to fail».

Purely as an addendum to the UK scenario - there were (and for all I know may still be) some specific criteria which were used to decide if the mother country was no longer an effective participant.

Instead of some of my policies already being enshrined as precedent from being «blessed» by the courts, all of them would be up to be struck down (which is much tougher if they've already been set as standing precedent), which is why I referred to even laws as potentially being no more enduring than an Executive Order, under this scenario.

«If this goes badly and there are scenarios that aren't good...» Andy knows.