We both know irresponsible owners are the cause of most of my problems.
Not exact matches
So, the argument «
no bad dogs, only
irresponsible owners» isn't going to work with me.
The quickest way to solve an unwanted animal and
irresponsible pet -
owner problem is to let everyone
know that you will quickly and humanely destroy every last one of their unwanted, uncared - for, or unsupervised animals for them.
We are not stupid or
irresponsible pet
owners... we simply didn't
know any better.
No longer are responsible pit bull
owners willing to compromise their ability to own a breed of dog that has fallen victim to a growing number of
irresponsible owners.
Again, I have no investment in what anyone decides to feed their pets, but I still think it
irresponsible to tout the benefits of a
known toxin without a STRONG WARNING to pet
owners.
No Kill opponents frequently attack appointment systems, arguing that
owners who want to give up a pet are too
irresponsible to make an appointment, and will simply (1) dump their pet on the street or, (2) surrender their pet to another shelter in the area that doesn't have a requirement for an appointment.
I
know that is life but it never fails that the responsible dog
owners and innocent dogs continuously are paying for the
irresponsible things other people do with their dogs.
Gun shop
owner Knowing that we apply common sense to other issues in our society, specifically like holding
irresponsible people accountable for their actions when they drink and drive and kill somebody, and we do that without restricting control of cars and cells phones to the rest of us, the good guys, why then do you and Hillary want to control and restrict and limit gun manufacturers, gun
owners and responsible use of guns and ammunition to the rest of us, the good guys, instead of holding the bad guys accountable for their actions?