Sentences with phrase «know it meant trouble»

Not exact matches

At the same time, the widespread availability of free or inexpensive hacking software and services means malicious students no longer need special skills to cause trouble.

Maybe that is why the well known theologian Karl Barth once wrote, «Theology means taking rational trouble over mystery.»

Everyone knows this and for the author to ignore this fact either means he is incredibly inexperienced (troubling) or down right duplicitous (scandalous).

Does it mean he no longer loves us if we have trouble or calamity, or are persecuted, or hungry, or destitute, or in danger, or threatened with death?

I am no longer positive whether or not this publish is written by means of him as nobody else realize such precise approximately my trouble.

I've always been troubled by «we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him», it helps to understand that «good» means to suffer for Christ.

The Holy Father set in motion these past two years of contention and, one hopes, constructive dialogue in the Church because he knows that marriage and the family are in deep trouble throughout the world, just as he knows that marriage, rightly understood, and the family, rightly understood, are the basic building blocks of a humane society: the family is the first school of freedom, because it is there that we first learn that freedom is not mere willfulness; marriage, for its part, is the lifelong school in which we learn the full, challenging meaning of the law of self - giving built into the human heart.

If by this one means that we can know very little about Jesus of Nazareth by means of the scientific methods of the historian, so that a modern biography of him is hardly possible, such a viewpoint need not trouble the believer, although it could be a topic of legitimate discussion among historians.

I am not positive whether this post is written by means of him as no one else know such detailed about my trouble.

ahh yeah, i know what you mean... it's nice to smell clean and fresh after going through all the trouble of washing your damn face in the first place!

It opened in August, and I can't believe it took me this long to go — I think I subconsciously knew that it would mean trouble for me.

But I do know that a basic understanding of science means I have just enough insight to get myself into trouble... or into FUN!

On the one hand, it is good to have some depth on the bench, on the other hand, you know you are in trouble when Ramsey makes it onto the pitch because it means our better players are not available.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Having faith doesn't mean one must be delusional, we have only brought in replacements no reinforcements, since last season we've been crying for a DM and CF yet Wenger will have us believe he's good enough to start and win us games against the likes of Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, Barcelona, Man City and Chelsea hell no we are in trouble in the bigger scheme of things!

Defeats to Maidenhead and Bromley mean Nathan Baxter and Woking are in deep relegation trouble now and, with two games left, they go into next weekend's trip to last - placed Guiseley knowing they have to win, with Barrow directly below them in the table enjoying the advantage of having two games in hand.

Keeping a set schedule means that children tend to wake up at the same time every day, eat their meals at the same time, and give parents less trouble when going down for naps and bedtime because they know what to expect.

All the little things your baby does can look intimidating, especially if they seem troubling and you don't know what they mean.

The only trouble for Lazio is the fact that 40 percent of respondents said they don't know who they support, which means there's considerable room for movement here.

I knew that it might mean that I might have trouble conceiving, but at that time I didn't have a sense as to the extent and didn't do any research — I figured I'd just suss it out later.

try to stay away from to much people i think the more people we know the more we can run in to trouble but it docent mean im antisocial Ive just been thru too much already.Plus i have a lot of respect...

When one of the characters fighting the avengers orders to «Send out the twins,» we know that this duo will mean trouble.

Yeah I know; I mean, if * I'm * picking up on the troubled production story (and I'm like, one of the least attentive people when it comes to news), god — who didn't know about the film's issues?

Without those connections, Perkins says he's not surprised that so many people have trouble naming things they learned early on that still have meaning today, or that disengaged students are raising their hands, asking why they need to know something.

While it might not seem like a priority, the trouble with this approach is that nobody knows what budgets will look like in that timeframe, meaning that schools could risk spending twice as much on migration costs.

I mean, there's always been this talk of some areas like special education and other specialty fields that, you know, school systems have had a lot of trouble doing recruiting.

Of course, without Robbie's own voice, it's impossible to truly know what Megaboy means, but as outsiders looking in, we can gain a glimpse into the heart of a troubled individual.

This means that the Blockchain is extremely secure, but the trouble with having this clever but complicated bit of tech in place is that it makes getting the concept of Bitcoin right hard, and lots of people aren't prepared to invest in something they don't know anything about.

You know the sort I mean: a cuckolded husband here, outstanding gambling debts there, a petty lawsuit or questionable inheritance, and more troubles of that kind.

They promote almost every genre, which means that you won't have any trouble getting your book accepted by them no matter the category it's in.

A lot of tax filers are getting IRS Reference Codes back, but don't know what they mean and don't know if they are in trouble.

The creditors making the offers know that you won't be permitted to file for bankruptcy again for at least 7 years, meaning that you'll be stuck with paying them back even if you get into trouble.

I don't know about you, but that always meant I was in trouble.

We invest in what we know, and while sometimes it can get us in trouble, like when Canada's oil sector crashed a few years ago, for the most part it means that you're missing out on better returns elsewhere.

Ive been feeding my dogs this for about 3 years and they do excellent on it.i have 4 mini schnauzers and i long hair chiauwa i do nt know proper spelling dog adopted me.i used to feed iams which is crap and science diet which i was told was good.wrong do nt believe everything you hear or read except this.since I've been feeding my dogs before health brand of dog food your weight is perfect their energy level is perfect and there is very minimal poop and just all around good food I feel good giving it to my animals and my animals are happy that they get it they don't have any trouble eating it I never have and I'm glad I found this particular brand of feed my animals because I was neversecure with what I was meaning before.this is true and correct that is what I have seen and experienced and that's what counts and that's what it's all about

Small variations in pressure are normal but if your feline detects larger changes she knows this could mean trouble ahead.

Alexander, certainly you are right, but the question that troubles you, does not solve our problem which is to know who is responsible of the present day climate changes; I fear that changing our Hydrocarbon based economy to a Hydrogene based economy, would send a much bigger green house gas in the atmosphere, I mean water vapor

Trouble is, in Aus, we have the likes of Abbott and Turnbull, Turnbull being an ex -(w) banker... and knows what this «pollution» tax really means.

The trouble is, now we're starting to talk a bit like scientists ourselves, which means we're starting to lose folks who just want to know what the hell it's really doing.

He correctly points out that trains would be far more efficient (and on - time) if they didn't have to go through the trouble of, you know, stopping to pick up passengers, Unfortunately, at present not stopping for passengers would mean, well, no passengers.

Switching to reusables would mean having to hire someone to wash dishes, but I doubt the hotel company would have trouble covering that cost, especially if they no longer had to buy a plate, bowl, juice cup, coffee cup, fork, knife, and spoon for every client.

[The novice] thinks through an idea only until it is passably clear to him, since, for his purposes, it needn't be any clearer; he dispenses with transitions because it's enough that he knows how his ideas connect; he uses a private system — or no system — of punctuation; he doesn't trouble to define his terms because he understands perfectly well what he means by them; he writes page after page without bothering to vary his sentence structure; he leaves off page numbers and footnotes; he paragraphs only when the mood strikes him; he ends abruptly when he decides he's had enough; he neglects to proofread the final job because the writing is over... Given his total self - orientation, it's no wonder that he fails repeatedly as a writer.

As I a client I want to know that my lawyer is smart and takes the trouble, by one means or another, to attach the best research to his / her own expertise.

But the rest can go: the Advil, CDs, business cards (the bane of my existence), masking tape, Christmas postcards I meant to send to the two people I know who haven't discovered email... There are a few other trouble spots I need to hit too, like the top of the filing cabinet, and that box of cables taking up space I could use.

It's April Fools» Day, and you know what that means: The headlines today are slightly less troubling than they are the other 364 days of the year.

Some misinterpreted Affleck's statement, thinking that their marriage is in trouble, but Garner said,» «I know Ben, I knew he meant it as the hugest, warmest compliment in the world,» The Telegraph reports.

But when it gets to extreme disputes - meaning the fighting gets louder, more frequent, or even violent - know that your marriage is in serious trouble.

One of these soldiers growled in a language I did not know, but clearly understood to mean, «You are in the wrong place and you are in trouble.»

Even though this is probably sounding self - centered (I'm having trouble putting my thoughts into words) it's not like my family is hating what I do with the house - you know what I mean?