Sentences with phrase «know little science»
This survey appears to be similar to studies that demonstrate Americans know little science, geography or history.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ Not exact matches
The design aims to highlight ApotheCARE Essentials» blending of nature and science and to attract the brand's target consumers, women who know what their look is and obsess over improving their hair and skin a little bit every day, Seal said.
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
No, but you mean to tell me that we simply popped into existence out of nothing, simply from an involuntary shudder that magically happened in the middle of absolutely nothing and then slowly through the sheer force of will (or accident, or telepathy, science hasn't quiet made its mind up on that one yet) one little green gob of magic stuff morphed into humans.
Athiests are like little temper tantrum throwing toddlers who get SO angry because nobody believes their lie.Most modern science today has actually debunked evolution.Scientists are admitting that had darwin known what we know now that he would be debunking his own theories.Go ahead now throw your angry little fits.Now go have Mommy change your diaper, because it is full of...
Instead, they find little stupid convoluted reasons to justify their actual views on the matter that reality - based science is actually a real cure to things we know about (thanks to the scientific method) when in fact religion offers nothing but wishful thinking.
«Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.»
You said, «The fact that you and many people believe that a «war» is going on between science and religion shows how little you really know.»
Wow, you sure know very little about science.
JDJ, «Smart» isn't learning science from your preacher, or from a book written thousands of years ago by men who know relatively little about the natural world.
Obviously, you know little about science.
I believe in God because I (or we) know so little of science.
Sentence two is the closest to an actual argument he makes, but it is a fact that science has little to no information on what happens after we die, as you pointed out yourself, we do not know (in the sense of having empirical proof).
That is the strength of science, acknowledging how little we actually know.
Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result
This discovery is being made simultaneously by a science, a philosophy and a theology as yet little known.
Your expose on science shows just about how little of science you know.
Nearly all the atheists posting here who hold science up like it is a religion know very little about science.
Science is true, god was created by people including scientists who could not be able to explains things when we knew so little about the earth and the universe.
All Science proves is how little we know about who God is and how much more we need to learn and understand who God is.
He knows very little about theology, and absolutely nothing about the supreme physical and computational sciences.
You appear to know little about science.
Anyone in science should be able to admit that we all actually know so very little.
Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a Big bang occurred, we know so little about the universe, that we don't even know everything about our own world, and you really believe that our science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?
It's not rocket science and frankly im suprised the article even asks thequestion Pundits, fans and anyone who knows even a little about football can realise arsenal lack a physical / quality spine — cb, dm and striker.
Their background in obstetrics, science and statistics is very limited; so limited, in fact, that they have no idea how little they know compared to those who have far more education and training in these subjects.
All right, we admit it, we are a little obsessed with everything science:) Hope you enjoy these free guides and let us know what you think!
He and Just plan on continuing their work with other sciences our ancestors knew little about, including genetics and computer science.
We believe these policies have little or no negative impact on the quality of the science; in addition, making these policies widely known will help smooth ruffled feathers of those not chosen to talk.
«If we go back and we know a bit more, and a bit more narrative goes in from the social sciences, we might be able to unravel a little bit more» about the reasons for attack frequency timing, Johnson suggests.
Journalist Sandlin introduces these little - known characters, including James Espy, dubbed the «Storm King» for his popular science lectures in the 1830s and»40s, and John Park Finley, who was among the earliest believers in the possibility of forecasting tornadoes.
Those of you familiar with my blog here at SciAm will know that I'm a little obsessed with science - themed music videos.
Steve: I mean, even if you cut these guys all the slack in the world, and say that they were sincere in their efforts and there was no mendacity involved, then the movie is just sort of incompetent in its presentation of the issue and of whatever science it tries to get into which is, you know, very little, but that's it.
The new report, from a panel of the interagency National Science and Technology Council, says that too little is known about endocrine disruptors to say where they rank compared to other environmental problems such as global warming and loss of species habitat.
Aside from anecdotes, we know very little about nonhuman primate laughter and humor, but some of the most significant findings to emerge in comparative science over the past decade have involved the unexpected discovery that rats — particularly juvenile rats — laugh.
Even if they did, notes the working paper, «little is known about effective teaching of mathematics in preschool, and even less is known about science.»
For a week now we have hiked more than 20 miles a day, frequently off trail, in search of the island's most elusive animal: a carnivore little known to science and unknown to most of the world.
So little is known about the fossa, and so much of what is known is wrong, that nearly everything Dollar documents is new to science.
Yet, little is known about the mental health problems that affect graduate students, including those in science.
M. Aaron MacNeil of the Australian Institute of Marine Science in Townsville, Queensland and colleagues have pulled together what little is known.
We know life evolved in the oceans... but many of the organisms we studied are uncharacterized, little known to science, and we have a lot of work to do understand where these organisms fit in in our understanding of life.»
«Far too little is known about the hundreds of chemicals that end up in our bodies, and EPA has far too little authority to deal with the chemicals that science has already proven dangerous,» Lautenberg said.
The study showed that both Republicans and Democrats supported more funding for science when they knew how little was spent.
When a tabloid best known for topless pinups breaks a Science journal embargo to publish news of a major physics finding, you know the world has gone a little gaga.
And there was this great, it was my favorite moment of the weekend and it was this very dramatic moment, when basically Emanuel was complaining a little bit, very politely, and smiling about the fact that journalists still are doing stories about, you know, the debate around climate science, but there's not really, of course, there's not a debate, there's consensus that anthropogenic global warming is happening and that, why are you still doing these stories, asking questions?
And there's a whole sort of Shakespeare industry where, you know, not just biographies of Shakespeare, although there's, you know, there's usually a couple that come out almost every year and books about Shakespeare's life and times, but there's very little I've found about Shakespeare and the world of science.
Spawning, as well as larval and juvenile development, will often occur in different habitats, and little was known about what the impact of changes in those environments is having on fish development, according to Harvey Walsh, a fisheries biologist at NOAA's Northeast Fisheries Science Center at the Narragansett Laboratory in Rhode Island.
Although the total numbers are not yet known, Dayton noted that «there is little to suggest any recovery from the $ 2.2 billion decline in support for science, innovation, and research since 2014.»
Knowing where we should draw the line is not always easy, as becomes clear in Curiosity, science writer Philip Ball's excellent, if a little idiosyncratic, investigation into the 17th century's scientific revolution.
If another owl in a mortarboard pops up and tells me «Science is cool, you know,» when all I'm trying to do is eat my huevos rancheros and watch a little SpongeBob on a Saturday, I'm going to shoot it.