Sentences with phrase «know much history»

You do not know much history?

Kids don't know much history today.

Not exact matches

I don't even really know that much about American history.»

But Buffett actually has a much longer history with Valeant than many people know.

While it's still not known when interest rates will go up and by how much, what we do know is that the bond market is at greater risk to rising interest rates than at any time in recent history.

If you built up a bad credit history in the past for example, but you know hold down a very well paying job then the lender may choose to not place as much importance on the credit score itself.

I've spent much of my time looking through history to read up on how the failure to wipe out the debt overhead led to the collapse of Rome's imperial republic, and to the Ottoman Empire as what was known as «the spoiling of Egypt» and «the ruin of Persia» toward the end of the 19th century.

Technical indicators are great, but they don't tell the whole story — Again, know the history, financials, and as much information as you can about your stocks.

Buyers are much more understanding if they know your history before they learn about it from someone else.

With this data, we can segment the audience much more precisely and serve up co-op offers that we know are relevant to an individual shopper, based on his or her purchase history.

When you know that, you can relate to Pat as an individual based on past history and as a result, her experience is so much better.

If you know anything about the history of the bible you know it was created by many writers, compiled and edited by Roman emperors, added to, translated, interpreted and actually pretty much ignored — except for a few sentences that sound old fashioned that people use to justify their beliefs and actions.

No matter how much you roar, your fictions are laid bare and your superstition is gradually becoming history.

So many people put so much «faith» in this book without knowing it's true history.

I don't have much background in history, so may I know how many years, decades, centuries had passed since that civil war?

As for the watch problem, its so hypothetical it's really not worth much more to pursue because you are right, I think it highly imporbable a watch would appear from nothingness, and since that has never in the history of the universe as we know it, to have happened, to discuss what I would do in that event is moot.

Nobody knows for certain what happens when we die, but considering how many gods and afterlives have been proposed in the history of humanity, the chance of the christian god being there to greet us when we die is pretty much the same as finding Anubis greeting us with Ma'at's feather.

Lolololololololololololol... the god cop - out answer... there is NO evidence of anything resembling a god anywhere throughout history... if your god loves you so much why did he wait until the earth had been around 4.6 billion years and created many different forms of life before creating you?

It seems you don't know much about the world history as typical Americans don't.

I also believe the fact that they comprise a much larger segment of history than humans do, and that it is insane that they would have been left out of the bible if it were really the «truth» passed on by an all knowing god.

Whether it's politics, science, history of literature... the young mind absorbs so much info but has not background to know what is real or not.

I do not know the precise history of those two key phrases, but I would guess that their origins are fairly recent — say, in the 1920s or 1930s, when media began to «personalize» and «democratize» so much of American private and public life.

And yet, if I turn my attention to it, I realize that my experience of this tree is bound up with much of what I know about where I live, my family, and the history of my country.

I agree very much with the idea Sam brings forth that in our early history as the human race we did not know of mental illness and explained it by possession.

You all clearly have more history in the EV village world than I do, and there is much that I don't know.

The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America: Since 1945 By George H. Nash Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 467 pages, $ 24.95 George Nash knows as much about the intellectual history of modern American conservatism as anybody, and it is a pleasure to have his classic 1976 study again available.

Bu tthe effort of trying to live a good christian life got to much ad i was disollutioned.Spent ten years as a backslidden barely believing christian and then in recent years as a transformed renewed Christian and i finally got it.It is all about a relationship with Jesus Christ and working in submission to the holy spirit he is the one that inspires his word he brings it to life.If you want to understand the word we must apply it to our lives then it becomes part of us thats the difference between knowledge and understanding not just knowing the word but living the word.The bible is a book useful for living not just a theoretical analysis or a history book.Jesus is the living word its through him that he opens his word to us without the holy spirit in us the carnal mind can not comprehend Gods word it a mystery.It was designed that way so only those who are truly seeking God shall find him.brentnz

Strictly speaking, I have no right to feel anything at all about the way the Church is going, and no right either to remember as much ecclesiastical history as I do or to buy and read paperbacks on theology.

I find, on the contrary, that it is much more difficult today for the knowing person to approach God from history, from the spiritual side of the world, and from morals; for there we encounter the suffering and evil in the world, which it is difficult to bring into harmony with an all «merciful and almighty God.

A bible - believing Christian should know through the Bible (and much of world history) what becomes of a nation, a country or a people that remove God of the human equation and scream from the rooftops, «You don't own us nor do you exist!!!»

When these two differences are combined with what we know about the history of the universe and of our earth, it would seem that the process view is much more plausible.

In this regard, his turn to history shares much, at least in intention, with Barth's turn to a Word of God who creates its own conditions of being known.

I know President Obama has faith is Christ, because; he has faced so much racism and hate more than any president in the history of the United States.

And yet we find ourselves in the strongest agreement with the German scholar, Professor von Rad, whom we have cited before, in his own expressed feeling that after all, legend is not an adequate term, so long as it is commonly understood simply as a mixture of history and unrestrained popular imagination (one part history, nine parts imagination — our comment, not his) We much better understand legend as a combination of history and meditation, and as motivated primarily by a concern to give expression to the meaning of history, as that meaning is conveyed by the faith that God makes himself known therein.12

Throughout these four interpersonal phases, the therapist comes to participate in the patient's world by getting to know as much as possible about the patient's history and mode of relating to others.

The reason, though offered as much by faith as by sight, is that in Jesus Christ, as the apostle put it to the Colossians, «all things hold together,» even the well - publicized actions of well - known figures and the day - to - day activities of ordinary people carried on with never a thought about the scrutiny of history.

I took the quiz, got 8 & like many have pointed out, it was more a history test than a test to see how much each person knew about their individual faith.

This speculative but extremely old idea is why the Church, for much of its history, did not know what to do with the Jews.

We know from modern science that the events of our lives occur within the story of a universe that is much vaster than our earthly history.

But even though iconoclasm in the material sphere was the characteristic act of Christian intransigence at the beginning of the Church's history, at the time of the monks of the Egyptian desert in the fourth century, and in the Reformation, it no longer seems to concern us much.

For the questions you ask, the Book of Mormon will ask you to explain how a kid in the 1830's could of written and known so much about central american history.

So it seems all the more difficult to accept the Bible as authoritative just because somebody — tradition or the early Church — says so, when in fact these somebodies did not know as much about the Bible's history and background and diverse elements as we do today.

But believing in the Bible as a fact of the Universe is a good sign that the person doesn't know much of history, comparative religion, philosophy or science in general.

«You have suffered too much,» Boa Dia wrote, «during four deadly years, not to understand that the Vietnamese people, who have a history of twenty centuries and an often glorious past, no longer wish, can no longer support, any foreign domination.»

Now I do know that you know much about church history but I would like to remind you that the Church formulated many of its doctrines, such as the Trinity, Jesus» divinity, etc., by way of combating heresy.

One of the reasons that we can not write a history of Jesus is that the Gospels do not pay much attention to historical method as we know it today».

Scholar who has spent years actively studying history and the Bible and actually knows what he is talking about: «Hey you guys have a couple of misconceptions about this thing you love so much, wouldn't you like to know the actual truth?»

As for equating the cross to the swastika, I wonder how much you know about the swastika's history, beyond it's use by the Nazis.

This prophesy in Daniel 11 vs. 39, tells of how this new strange god with a strong hold, meaning with force, and we all know from history, that christianity was forced by Constantine, and legalized in 311bce, that he acknowledge, and increased with glory, and that will rule over many for gain, sounds like control, and gain to me.As many of these popes, and priest, have so much money, but the flocks are paying for it.

Before there was much speculation on the «nature» of the person and long before any dogmatic statements about that nature were attempted, the members of the community knew that they stood at the great climacteric moment of all history, that in and through the things which had happened among them and of which they were witnesses, God had visited and redeemed his people.