Nobody
knows the answer to this question yet...»
Jeffrey Davis, I think the point here is that we don't
know the answer to your question yet; hence the intense research focus.
We just do not
know the answer to that question yet
Assuming my doctor doesn't
know my answers to those questions yet, what's likely to be the first recommended course of action?
Not exact matches
In this blog post, I seek
to answer that
question by showing you a simple,
yet quite reliable way
to know when
to step back on the gas pedal.
Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all -
knowing, always present creator,
yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability
to answer question break the laws of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?
If there is something we don't
know yet and you apply god
to it, that doesn't
answer the
question of «how»?
# 2 said yes, because he'd be busting with curiosity
to know the
answers to all kinds of
questions that have
yet to be revealed.
Two comments.One, the atheist / materialist claims that he / she... «Did «nt believe in free will»... O.K.Should we take that
to mean some mindless, heretofore unknown force apllied those words in your behalf?Did someone put the proverbial «gun
to your head «and force you
to post your comments?we await you presumably forced
answer with bated breath.Two.As for Mr.Gingrich, beware.Politics aside, the one
question yet remains for Calista: How did you, a professed «devout «Roman Catholic, carry on a 6 - year affair with a man you
knew was married?How does that square with the Biblical prohibition against committing adultery?Oh wait!I know!As a «devout «Roman Catholic you can sin with impunity; just go
to your priest, say a couple of «hail Marys and Our Fathers», ask the priest
to bless your sinning, and resume.Of course!I had forgetton how easily Catholics excuse their trangressions (ex opere operato, anyone).
Watching him live this double life of public man and poet, one wonders what Astrue — or Juster — is really thinking when he
answers the biting
questions of a reporter demanding
to know why the new commissioner hasn't
yet personally fixed the entire Social Security system.
Jesus had not
yet said a word
to them, but they
knew the
answer to their
question.
Despite our ignorance of much that we might like
to know and with an honest recognition that we do not and can not «have all the
answers to all the
questions,» we
yet have enough
to impel us
to be responsible and zealous in thought and word and deed.
I do admit that I have problems
to bring across what I am talking about here and I do not
know all the
answers to my
questions yet.
It's far from rhubarb season
yet, so this isn't really an urgent
question, but I would like
to have an
answer for it, so that when they do arrive at the greengrocer's I can
know whether I need
to buy a kilo or half a kilo...
hehe well u r the one who is delusional talking about arsenal is in ur bloods well for us arsenal is our blood.whats this with wenger support if its top four that u guys value so much and hve made it more appealing than a epl title wow shame on of all us see what we hve turned aarsenal into.THIS IS ARSENAL.the moment someone becomes bigger than a club then no way are things okay.ill end with asking my
question which has not been
answered yet... do u believe wenger will win title with arsenal nxt yeat (epl), do u believe we will be among the strong contenders for the title untill the end when it matters most???? wenger is a smart guy he
knows nxt season automatic arsenal will be struggling even for fourth so that is our target and its a shame we fans r ready
to waste another year.I am done with this saga we will find out soon enough and I hope and pray we don't regret giving this so called legend another chance coz I hve screamed, cried, and pple dare call pple who want change not arsenal fans or not die hards.cheers guys seems top four is safe our annual top fourbparade is in place
This is an incredibly difficult
question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only
to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel
to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards
to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems
to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early
to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency
to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs
to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious
to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often
knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently
to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow
to ever boss the midfield and he tends
to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed
to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess
yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready
to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him
to use Francis and then he had the nerve
to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary
to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed
to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends
to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little
to no sense considering what he has
to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford
to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try
to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards
to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair
to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went
to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had
to choose one of those 3 players
to stay on it would be Ox due
to his potential as a plausible alternative
to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue
to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due
to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem
to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold
to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction
to heroin without the benefits
You can blame the press in a way, they ask the
questions we all want
to know the
answers to,
yet get fobbed off by Wenger with the attitude that EVERYBODY who asks these
questions are stupid, Its always the refs fault OR the linesman or the other teams dog, OR every pundit in the world is wrong and cant see the genius that is AW's plan of action ect ect.
To answer your
question, no one
knows yet as it will depend on any detailed exit negotiations with the other European countries.
Steve: And [
to a degree] do you think that it's a
question that neither company really
knows the
answer to yet and the users are really going
to work this out [among] themselves and determine the course that the two companies go in?
«Although we have not
answered this
question yet, at least we now
know that there is a
question to answer.»
Hubble's most important discoveries have provided
answers to questions that astronomers did not
yet know how
to ask, and found objects that were not
yet imagined.
That's what makes this a great
question, because science is all about finding
answers to things we don't
know yet.
If you've read this post up
to this point, you should probably already
know my
answer to this
question, but I first wanted
to touch on a sweetener I haven't talked about
yet: High - Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS).
I don't
know what the
answer is
to your
question about why tea being impaired by certain substances such as milk proteins, and
yet cocoa catechins are not impaired.
The
answer to that
question is
no, but Emma wanted
to,
yet Sharon doesn't react with judgement.
The fact is, it's never too late
to clean your life up and that's why I'm (re) posting this as I felt it was truly inspirational for young and older worldly people alike who are perhaps thinking of getting married and pondering the; «should I not have sex before marriage»
question (the
answer to which is incredibly obvious from reading The bible and
yet we all get bogged down in
questioning it's clear abstinence stance on the issue because the world confuses Christians and
no - Christians alike).
As a goodbye, we're greeted by president Kevin Feige, who oversees the entire operation and
knows answers to questions that haven't even been asked
yet.
The one part of your
question that
no one has
answered yet is:
no, you're not a fool for trying
to hunt this down on your own.
I don't
know - just as this
question is a hard one
to contemplate and thus has not been
answered by many
yet - I think that this book is really a tough one
to sort through.
It
answered questions I didn't even
know to have
yet since I'm still very timid about asking for reviews.
It's been a great tool for me
to stalk for ideas on software and get
questions answered when I didn't even
know I had them
yet.
Interview with Goodreads CEO Otis Chandler and Amazon's VP of Kindle content, Russ Grandinetti, on paidContent raises many of the
questions that people are asking, although
answers are mostly variations of «we don't
know yet» and assurances that things will remain the same (the headline «First Do No Harm» comes from Grandinetti's response
to the
question of whether Amazon reader reviews will migrate
to Goodreads, «Our mentality here is
to first do no harm, and make sure that if we're going
to do integrations, users genuinely find it
to be a big benefit.»)
I'm not quite at the beta reader stage
yet, but I'd be interested in
knowing the
answers to those
questions too!
To answer your
question, I don't
know yet but I'm cautiously optimistic.
Oh the art of
knowing how
to ask the
question to get the
answers you need... You asked about bank account,
yet expect an
answer about which transaction has tax consequences.
And
to answer the
question,
no, I have
yet to visit Mexico, but what you show here is a great encouragement.
Better [study and diving] conditions for only a fraction of the cost that would have been paid at home... [Dive Instructor] was very thorough,
yet patient and willing
to answer any
questions no matter how stupid
We don't have any firm
answers to these
questions just
yet (except that last one, that's a firm «
no»), but we do have some insight into the console ahead of its hour long Direct in a few days from Nvidia CEO Jen - Hsun Huang.
And
yet the
answer to the second
question should be a firm
no.
In this current age of abstract painting, we
know too much
to be as spiritual and utopian about it,
yet the
questions asked and the methods of their
answering still bear fruit intellectually, psychologically, culturally, politically, etc..
> If you are a real scientist, then you
know the
answers to the
questions I cite have
yet to be found.
Yet,
to answer but another
question, if we look at ye old 1988 Hansen graph, you
know, the one that got the 1998 El Nino right, we see between 1973 and 1984 a flat eleven year period in Scenario B So what more do the denialists want, good predictions of El Nino, flat decades and more out of a twenty year old model that you can run on a PC.
Icarus: Since nobody who actually
knows what they are talking about has
yet answered your
question, allow me
to try.
We don't
yet know the
answer to that
question.
Yet he may fail
to mention that detail, and you won't ever get
to cross examine the witness on the issue because you won't want
to ask the
question if you don't
know the
answer in advance.
For the most part, the most honest
answer to those
questions will always be «I don't
know yet.»
The AI isn't
yet developed well enough
to know that the content in your site is really relevant
to answer someone's
question so they used
to get around that by understanding that the more popular you are, that must mean that you're really good at it.
As all the world (nearby) likely
knows by now, Mr. Justice Rothstein will attend at a meeting of an ad hoc committee made up of members of Parliament in order
to answer their
questions concerning... exactly what, we're not
yet sure.
We don't
yet fully
know the
answer to that
question, but it does look like we now
know the basic look of it and that it will support unlocking by scanning your face.
That is,
answer the range
question based on what people already in that position make at the company — which you should
know from your research — and
answer the current - salary
question by fleshing out your other benefits and the possibility of recently increased duties that have
yet to be reflected in a raise.