Sentences with phrase «know my characters so»

In fact, Coltrane's quote isn't even the flimsiest inclusion: At one point, longtime Linklater editor Sandra Adair declares that «he knows his characters so well and he understands the kinds of films he's making.»

It helps that we know this character so well; the long history is already built in.

I have no formula for how I come up with the plot lines, I just know my characters so well, I already know what they're going to do before I ever start writing about them.

Here's the full cast of known characters so far, alongside the newely released character stats.

Not exact matches

This is awesome post, but I want to know one thing, we know that Google crawls only 150 - 160 characters of title tag, so what about title tags for some miscellaneous titles like some project report of something like that?

I think our religions and cultures, our beliefs and our character, are so interwoven, so codependent, so symbiotic, that it's no longer helpful to distinguish them.

Or perhaps like the poor gullible fool you are, you just accept things on faith knowing that nothing was written about this character until 30 - 40 years after death and knowing that stories told like that so many years after could very well hold little accuracy.

3Not only so, but we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope.

Anyway, we have come to the conclusion that YES, God is God and he can do whatever HE wants, but He can never act outside of HIs character, and when we understand God's character is good and loving and compassionate and so on, then we are not threatened by Him doing what he wills, because we know His will is always good.

As an atheist I think it's important to know if your candidate picks his nose and eats the boogers, not that it makes any policy difference, but it is a charachetr difference, and if the candidate promotes his faith which includes baptizing dead jews whether out of guilt or love, I want to know about it so I can make an informed character choice on who I give my vote to.

I have seen a lot of bad behavior from christians, (or those claiming to be) I was also incredibly surprised to find so many nonchristians, whether they be from varying religions, or agnostics and atheists, to have good behavior, and even exhibit «fruit of the spirit», what I once considered to be a way to test the faith, or rather character of a christian, (they will know them by their fruit).

Hartshorne connects the ideas of relative and absolute in the act of knowing: «Unrestricted or literal relativity; so far from being the mere de facto character of our inferior human knowledge, is rather the precise ideal of knowledge in its most absolute meaning» (DR 10).

Gods came to set the captive free.God is always in control he calls the shots not Satan he is in control his motives and purposes we can not understand but we do know his character is always for good and he always has a plan.It is spiritual lesson from a real life situation.I am jumping way ahead here but at the time the people sent Jesus away the demoniac man was sent back to his family when you read later because of his testimony the next time they visit years later to those towns many people are saved because of him so again yes some pigs died one man was set free but that man went and told his story and many were saved and added to the kingdom so to God be the glory.brentnz

Kinda makes a poor judge of character, so if you are willing to debate freely in a conversation on life, the world, the pursuit of knowledge, and all the unknowns in the world with an underage male, then I encourage you to continue the debate freely, but if you feel outmatched in a knowledge criteria and you wish to avoid shame of not understanding enough or even not knowing enough (because they are different) then i will gently step aside as not to harm your ego.

This similarity between mythical thinking and the I - Thou relation is made explicit through Professor (and Mrs.) Frankfort's use of Buber's distinction between I - It and I - Thou, their identification of myth with the dynamically reciprocal I - Thou relation in which every faculty of man is involved, and their recognition of the unique and unpredictable character of the Thou — «a presence known only in so far as it reveals itself.»

What's even more incredible is that PRISM extolls a piece of music written by a man whose very character PRISM would call into question because of his s3xual orientation - except PRISM is so ignorant he failed to educated himself sufficiently to know that Barber was openly gay.

What I do believe is that we need to really know Jesus to know God — Although text meaning can change Jesus who is the word of God — His personality doesn't change...... so when you read behind the text and see the personality of Jesus — you get to know Him for who He is and then I can test anything the bible or text say against His character for truth!

The «Father» of the Nation, being the United States of America is quoted saying; «The General is sorry to be informed — , that the foolish and wicked practice of profane cursing and swearing, a vice heretofore little known in an American army, is growing into a fashion; — he hopes the officers will, by example as well as influence, endeavor to check it, and that both they and the men will reflect that we can have little hope of the blessing of Heaven on our arms, if we insult it by impiety and folly; added to this, it is a vice so mean and low, without any temptation, that every man of sense and character detests and despises it.»

The principal points Paul made in that address are (1) to recall to their minds the character and quality of his ministry to them; (2) to remind them of the trouble the Jews gave him and the anxiety and suffering he underwent in their behalf; (3) to state that he preached repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as the essence of the gospel; (4) to testify that he went now to Jerusalem not knowing what would happen to him there except that he knew by the Holy Spirit that afflictions awaited him; (5) to assure them that nothing concerned him, not even the loss of life itself, so long as he could testify to the grace of God in Jesus Christ; (6) to say that he had no regrets about his ministry to the people in Ephesus, for he was clean of the blood of all the people there, for he preached the full gospel to all of them; and (7) to admonish them to be diligent in their oversight of the Ephesian church and to feed the church of God there, which Christ purchased with his own blood.

This episode is huge character development, not so much with the major - story - arc - connections (at least as far as we know) so there is much to discuss.

And Paul's view of man's condition (and in its essentials his is the central biblical view) can not be declared false, for all its mythical character, so long as it is the only view of man which takes adequate account of this inescapable reality of human experience: On the one hand, I know that «it is not I who do these things but sin which has possession of me»; but, on the other hand, I know that I am responsible for these acts of sin and that I deserve to die because of them.

Writing of men in an old section of the South that he knew so well Wolfe writes: «He is not a colonist, a settler, a transplanted European; during his three centuries there in the wilderness he has become native to the immense and lonely land that he inhabits; during those three centuries he has taken on the sinew and the color of that earth, he has acquired a character, a tradition, a history of his own..

I know that sounds ridiculous today, but not all that long ago, my father was forced to learn to write right - handed so that his character wouldn't display the taint of left - handness.

A good example: I've been playing a videogame of late with a combination Greek / fantasy pantheon in which the player - character is a very faithful servant of a particular goddess, knows other gods exist (because killing them / beating them up is the main plot of the game), and winds up with an ally who can clearly see that the gods exist but only cares about following himself — so there's a mix there of misotheism with a few of the gods (they are there, but they're evil), faithful worship (serving a good goddess), and nay theism («You gods are selfish jerks, I'm going my own way!»).

This reprobate character is known not only through an individual's own experience with himself as he struggles with impulses too strong for his own strength to overcome, but also through his observation of the world about him, a world in which evil and its works are so terribly apparent, and in whose operations he is so inextricably involved.

But there is certainly nothing inherent in the standard free - will perspective that requires the FWT to hold that God's primary purpose for creating free creatures was to make it possible for God to «enjoy the value of knowing that those of us who developed moral character and spiritual virtue... did so freely» (ER 18).

You were a former spiritual advisor to Bill Clinton, and you know Hillary Clinton on a personal level, so I'd be interested to hear your insight into her character.

When these steps have been taken, we shall be freed from being driven to the construction of implausible just - so stories, alleging that human capacities of which we have basic experience are totally different in character from what we, in fact, know them to be.

Remember, all we know of God is as a character that appears in a book just as these other beings appear in media so, by your argument, all of these things could equally exist.

Those are not beliefs — not in the biblical sense of the term «belief» — or if they are a form of belief they are disconnected from any relevance to you and I. None of these «so called» beliefs affect much of what you do with your life — knowing about a virgin birth won't give you the tools to be a better parent — these «beliefs» do not function like that — they are more suppositions about the character of God.

It appears in Socrates, from whose circle of disciples so many a character and name are known to us.

God, who created this infinite universe, and all that's in it being reflection of His infinite attributes, with even the smallest things so detailed in their design, that it would be total absurdity to think they have gotten that way by evolving themselves... this Creator would have never created us, human beings, giving us such abilities that we posses, without giving us a way to understand Him, His nature and His character and to KNOW Him, as we are known of Him.

And as he, in order to make known the beloved figure, tries to transmit the features of the master's character to others, so also the other disciples do it, in fact all who surround the master.

The Tao - Te - Ching, perhaps because of its rather vague, elusive character, has not become so widely known as the more practical, common - sense, far more easily understood Confucian books.

We know you and your family want to have fun, so there are special activities planned for kids of all ages, for instance, Hershey's Character appearances, miniature golf, family bingo, and more!

You know now how people react to certain advice so I always try to adapt on that and give good information for their character.

How terribly sad... we have fallen so far that we find ourselves in the ridiculous position of propping up the oft - injured and rarely inspirational Jack Wiltshire... what's next, extending Walcott, Welbeck and Ramsey... can't you see that these players have nothing to do with winning and all to do with providing recognizable names to the plastic fans who frequent our overgrown library of a stadium... it's high time we rid this club of one of the worlds most incompetent and unsuccessful owners (look it up) and our fragile and spineless manager (much like our club) who can't bring in the best talent because he knows he can't live up to expectations that come with players of that ilk... think about it, he couldn't even handle Sanchez, who was largely a periphery character in Barcelona

Rusev has consistently been one of the best characters in WWE, and is one of the reasons to endure SmackDown during a stretch so poor there are rumors floating around that even the people involed in making the show know it's not good.

Now we all know that his favorite position is being the Number 10, but instead of moaning about not being deployed there like so many players we've seen in the past, he is simply doing the job he's asked to do and is giving it nothing less than his full commitment, and I believe that speaks volumes of his character.

Sometimes i do nt understand some people saying thing like Benzema is not what we need and that he is not that good.Some people lack reasoning to be very honest.They do nt think before talking.I wonder why people say that because when you watched him from his first season up to this season he really is that good.Some arsenal legends are saying we need him almost everyone is saying so too.We need him and stop judging his character because you have no right to judge anyone.Giroud is an average striker and i am not judging him from yesterday's game i am judging him from season 1 to this season.He is nothing special and has never been.

He had more money than he knew what to do with, so he did whatever he and his friends could think of, a video game character leveled all the way up.

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

Hey SoOpa AeoN you got a cool but yoy don't talk cool at all along with rkw.I didn't like the way Chicarito's name was rubbed in the mad and what pains me is that you all think Giroud is better.The fact that you are a team reject does not mean you aren't good enough or can't be world class.Do you want me to name a few rejects who have become world class or have come back to haunt their teams.If I was to choose between sticking with Giroud or Chicarito for thousand years we all know who people would go for.The over hyped average players in our club is unbelievable and it's just sad.The club is also over hyped at times and we feel like we are so so big.It's a shame.The mentality of this club is so so bad and trust me with this characters success will be far away for centuries to come.

again this is Askren's side of the story so we don't know what Dana's side is (or Bjorn's)(the later too being of unscrupulous character) tho I don't think ive seen Dana or Bjorn refute this side of the story

At the same time, you very much know it's against the rules to sell your autograph, and every time you do so, you risk getting caught doing it, especially since those you're dealing with aren't necessarily going to be of the highest moral character, and it only takes one to turn you in.

We don't really know anybody... outside family and friends So knowing their character... is really only for a few hours on sunday..

But it's not perfect... for the life of me I'll never understand why a grown woman would butt in line in front of a toddler to hug someone in a Winnie The Pooh costume, why parents would wait for eons in line (in the blazing sun) so their child can get an autograph from a movie character (umm — you know that's not really Ariel, right?)

I have to know, or at least try to know, what's personality, what's character, and what is the way that my children are emotionally strong, so to speak.

There are so many great books about oral health, many of which feature characters kids already know and love, like Arthur and the Berenstain Bears.

For children already familiar with the Magic Tree House, it can be a special treat for them to experience a seasonal story set in the world of characters they know so well.