Sentences with phrase «know scientific language»

But that's I think because the public is uninformed about specifics, and even when an equally carefully worded phrase is used, where 98 % of scientists know it's not consensus, the same 50/50 split among the public will come up, and all that means is they don't know scientific language and the specifics of the issue well and otherwise it says a lot less than you might think at first glance it says.

Not exact matches

When you're writing a scientific manuscript, for instance, you know that your audience is other experts, so you use technical language and dive deep into details.

Knowing the language of the then fastest - rising scientific power «gave me work as a translator when I came back to the U.S.,» he says.

Nheengatú time reference is just one of the types of combinations of spoken and visual language that some linguists are beginning to suspect may be more common than is currently known; since historically many languages have been studied only based on written words and audio recordings, future scientific studies of video recordings may find new and unexpected types combinations of spoken and visual language that may have been previously invisible.

A scientific disagreement — In an 1881 neuroanatomy atlas, Wernicke, a well - known anatomist who in 1874 discovered «Wernicke's area,» which is essential for language, wrote about a fiber pathway in a monkey brain he was examining.

This alkalizing diet and scientific approach — known as The New Biology ® — is based on their extensive nutritional microbiological work, which spawned their authoring of the globally renowned book series, «The pH Miracle,» which has been printed in over twenty languages.

Sandwiched among the dramatic vignettes of the story, Greenwood pauses to pepper the book with historical sidebars about the «secret code» language used by those who helped shuttle slaves north to safety; a biographical sketch of Harriet Tubman, known as «Moses» to those along the route; a brief history of storytelling among southern slaves; a scientific explanation for the «swamp ghosts» many slaves encountered along their escape routes; an inside look at some of the methods used to hide slaves from capture; and much, much more.

«In engaging, easy - to - understand language, Climate Change Denial tells us all we need to know about global warming denial, explaining why, even though the scientific evidence is irrefutable, denial continues to prosper.

I know that is not tremendously scientific, but when science is having a difficult time defining a meaningful climate trend, see Koutsoyiannis, then the larger language is going to have to suffice.

(And I really don't know if R can handle this type of overlying parameter even though I have written a script - like language close to R in it's functionality with self - recursive matrices, vectors, list with complex, etc, really a graphical calculator with all scientific units embedded) So I know the code at that level but not on the proper statistics level.

The paper on May 2 posted an editor's note saying that the Revkin article had pointed to one version of a Global Climate Coalition public «backgrounder» without knowing there was a subsequent backgrounder «that included language that conformed to the scientific advisory committee's conclusion.»

Anyone who has read, say, one or more scientific papers know that this is not the usual language of academic papers.