Sentences with phrase «know the answers to those questions because»

told me running my credit with them was a soft inquiry after we both agreed it wasn't possible for it to go in my name, then I call and had the chance to speak with Mark the sales manager and he basically told me you wrote your social down so that gave us the right even if you told him not too, and he hung up in my face because he knew they were wrong told me he don't know any answers to my questions because he wasn't there when it happened, they are not professional in any type of way, especially to the wife of a soldier who serves and protect their very own country

I went their to purchase a car in my husbands place because he is in the Army serving our country to protect people like them and Mario lied to me and... told me running my credit with them was a soft inquiry after we both agreed it wasn't possible for it to go in my name, then I call and had the chance to speak with Mark the sales manager and he basically told me you wrote your social down so that gave us the right even if you told him not too, and he hung up in my face because he knew they were wrong told me he don't know any answers to my questions because he wasn't there when it happened, they are not professional in any type of way, especially to the wife of a soldier who serves and protect their very own country

Some people want to know the answer to this question because they have bad credit that they want to improve and others ask because they don't have a credit history at all.

I know the answers to those questions because I've been online for a long time.

Not exact matches

«Nobody knows the answer to that question, because that's in the future, but what we do know is that this will increase economic growth,» Ryan said.

«I hope the Tesla fans know how to swim, because without the answers to the tough questions, it looks like Musk is leading them straight into the water.»

You should make sure that your LinkedIn profile holds a relevant mission statement that answers all their questions because that is the first place most candidates will head to order to get to know you better.

During our live interviews with top rated guests you will be able to get the answer you want to know, because YOU ask the questions!

Ideally, you won't have to face this question in a crisis — because you should know the answer.

«The boring questions can also be categorized as the tough ones,» said Dave Sullivan, an analyst at AutoPacific Inc. «I hope the Tesla fans know how to swim, because without the answers to the tough questions, it looks like Musk is leading them straight into the water.»

I didn't answer your question because it is a dishonest question» @Chad «you did nt answer it, becasue you know precisely the position it would put you in, namely having to acknowledge that society shouldnt allow any behavior.

Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability to answer question break the laws of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?

= > did nt answer the question because you know it will expose the inconsistency in your position of «anything that someone wants to do is just fine with Really - O?

And when they ask questions you can not answer because you do not know, just revert to the religious person's favorite default, «It is part of god's plan.

# 2 said yes, because he'd be busting with curiosity to know the answers to all kinds of questions that have yet to be revealed.

I am agnostic because I genuinely don't know the answer to the questions that atheists and christians pose.

And yes to answer your next question (because I do know you better than you think I do) I love being used by GOD.

I was very reluctant to do that because I felt that I really wasn't sure if I would get an answer, or that I wouldn't be ready for an answer, or that I wouldn't know for certain if I felt that I did get an answer that is was actually from God or whether I was just deceiving myself, so for a few years there I just put that off, however those questions and concerns kept boiling up within me, so at that point I couldn't take it anymore putting it off.

Of course, this is a much easier question to reply to if your answer is «No, because it conflicts with free will».

Though to be honest, I don't know the answer to this specific question because I've never read up on it.

And they had to answer practical moral questions, because the people who were abandoning their old gods needed to know what the new God demanded.

I know at this point its sort of kicking a dead horse, because I know we've both agreed that clearly we'll see what we want to see but your answer just begged the question, so this friend of yours is he a) a christian himself b) had he been praying for a job before c) why did your prayer take an entire week to be fulfilled d) is it a good job?

The first four are all arguements from ignorance and immediately invalid — just because we do not know the answer to these questions does not mean they immediately equal GOD.

Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son Tom did not ask a question to get an answer because he already knew the only answer he could accept.

It is really annoying because the answers «yes or no» answers but they have already formulated the answer to their question.

The history of the Catholic Church and their dealings in politics and Wars... Wars that kill people... ok... Catholicscomebackhome.com... No Thanks... You know why the Diocese can not answer spiritual questions or satisfy peoples spriritual need... it is because they want to keep people in darkness... Do nt be afraid to research... you will find that history tells how the Church executed those who attempted to read the Bible...

Agnosticism is really the best position to hold, because we truly don't know the real answers to any of these questions.

I never know what to say because honest answers to these questions would reveal what a terrible pacifist I am.

Wilson thinks that the answer to these and similar questions is no, primarily because of scientific illiteracy, but also because of a widespread failure to live up to the intellectual, religious and moral implications of science.

Actually my comprehension is fine actually its better than yours because you dismissed the question and actually didn't answer it, and when he came back you didn't answer at all so care to now??? I would also like to know why it isn't his civil right just as much as the gays??

One of the problems I see in my own congregation and with several on this site is, they do not want to move on, to grow, to mature, to develop, because they instintively know that the answers to some of their questions will not be to their liking.

Mirosal... you are not doing great with any answers... as a matter of fact you arent answering any questions... you are asking them... and why is it so important to claim that you are atheist... this is false pride... something that is evident in any unatural and foolish human group... its almost as if people hide behind this false pride to make them feel better for things they know in their own heart are foolish... and what need is there for order if there is no GOD... because if no one cared about their soul... then this might become the dog eat dog world that you people are hoping for

You don't want to answer the question / comment because you know he has a point.

My First tendency was rather naturally to answer in the negative to this question because as far as I know Ralph Nader has no personal faith that is witnessed to publicly through his frequent pronouncements about «consumerism.»

You do ask a lot of questions throughout this series of posts (which is good), but just because you (or any of us) don't know the exact answer to them, that doesn't mean that the Bible can't be inspired.

But here I stand — not to lead, but to follow; not as a mere «ally,» but as a sister; not because I have it all figured out or have all my questions answered, but because I know in my heart it's the right thing to do.

Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29

Just because I don't know the answer to every single question doesn't mean that I'm using «circular reasoning.»

All of these people are thanking you and even asking you questions and you don't know the answer to them because....

Or is it because some traditional known critical Gooners have protested against his tenure that has made him to answer the journalist the way he has answered the question.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Oh, and I guess to answer the original question: No, it doesn't help to criticize refs after the fact because at some point of time it'll come back and bite you in the arse.

If there's anything I can ever do to persuade you to come to Morehouse, any question I can answer for you, just call me and let me know, because I've been where you are now, and maybe I can help you out.»

This is what I want to know... ask questions, don't throw stones, but demand answers because we as supporters are entitled to them.

When people refuse to answer a simple question and instead spend their time giving non-answers, it's usually because they know that the honest answer works against their position, and they're not willing to have an honest discussion that leads to a mutual understanding and a reasonable gray - area conclusion or a pros - and - cons conclusion.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

«These are always difficult questions to answer because we never know what's going to happen tomorrow.

In know I have questions I'd sure like to have answered by been - there - done - that moms and I feel so helpless to answer some of your questions at times because, frankly, I've no idea how to deal with some of the stuff despite what I'm learning.

Not being able to look things up in tests if she didn't know them — because she was so used to finding out the answers to questions she didn't know.

But you know parenting questions and sleep questions and if I had a specific question I definitely tend to kind of put it out in my online mama tribe because I can feel like get a variety of answers that way.