Sentences with phrase «know the errors in»

I love the irony of the Biblical experts using glaring known errors in translation to identify one of the earliest and most widely distributed English examples of the supposedly infallible «Word of God.»

Reasons include known errors in thin ice detection, bias in summertime concentration estimates, and the relative compactness of the marginal ice zone.

Also, the characteristics of being naive, ignorant, and narrow - minded are also factors that hinder applicants to know the errors in the application document.

Therefore, as the listing agent, Valley Park had the duty to make known the error in the zoning status to anyone interested in the property and to correct the information in the MLS.

Not exact matches

The goal is to reach 5,000 per week no later than June 30, but in order to achieve that and allow for a margin of error, Musk is setting the new goal of 6,000 per week by that date.

Congressional testimony and investigations by the company and regulators revealed that GM engineers knew of the faulty switch for at least a decade, but a series of errors led to affected vehicles being recalled only in 2014.

Verizon (vz) says it didn't know about Lanham's fraud and notified an FCC program administrator more than 10 years ago that it had received some E-rate funding in error.

As I point out in the video, his observations showed the masses of clusters were too large, but the numbers he got were far too high, and we now know they must have been in error (or, to be more fair, his uncertainties were too large).

• Also known as errors and omissions insurance, professional liability insurance protects your business against malpractice, errors, and negligence in service provided to your customers.

In fact, persistence and strong trial - and - error can be even more important than business know - how.

The error that most make is speaking in the vernacular of the knowing.

The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know neither victory nor defeat.

Re-aging a delinquent credit card account can be a great way to wipe out payment errors in your past, or it can be a way to reanimate debts that you are no longer legally required to pay.

I think it is difficult to know where the next crisis will come from, and, in general, it is better to have a system that is safe from errors in judgment and surprise than it is to try and avoid errors in judgment and surprises because as along as you are dealing with human beings, there will be errors and surprises.

Of course, better technology may increase the accuracy of predictions but serious errors in estimation of availability of reserves have been known to happen.

«Gifted, determined, ambitious professionals have come into investment management in such large numbers during the past 30 years that it may no longer be feasible for any of them to profit from the errors of all the other sufficiently often and by sufficient magnitude to beat market averages.»

Having learned everything he knows through trial and error, Frisella's advice is uniquely insightful in the start - up world.

No doubt many of you sharp - eyed readers will have spotted a spelling error, thinking I intended to refer to one of these: But, in fact, I really did have in mind something more like this: We are following an example from the recently published Mathematica Beyond Mathematics by Jose Sanchez Leon, an up - to - date text that...

If you spot an error in our data, or think we have missed an important deal, please let us know by emailing [email protected].

To say your purpose is to be a loving father is in error as that is the result of a belief or world view (I do not know you so that is an example)

Your are making two fundamental logical errors, while also showing that you know nothing about the nature of serving in the military

Atheists don't treat him like god, so if there are errors in his theories, we don't say «well Darwin is All knowing and All wise, so it MUST be true».

(28) Say: «He is (Allah) Most Gracious: we have believed in Him, and on Him have we put our trust: so soon will ye know which (of us) it is that is in manifest error.»

RESOLVED, That we earnestly pray, both for those who advocate racist ideologies and those who are thereby deceived, that they may see their error through the light of the Gospel, repent of these hatreds, and come to know the peace and love of Christ through redeemed fellowship in the Kingdom of God, which is established from every nation, tribe, people, and language.

For one I could point out 20 mispelling errors, «Mormonism» not a word, weird huh.I am a Mormon I do support Mitt and I did in 2008, but religion aside Mitt can get it done, and he has in the past!!!! Obama has failed the USA no doubt about that.Mitt's morals, family values is what America is on.Shame on the people who can't move past that, You (not me) voted on a black man for President and not a Mormon, turns out the Mormon Canidiate coud have changed the whole USA around cool huh.

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.28 And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 backbiters, hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, covenant - breakers, without natural affection, unmerciful: 32 who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practise such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but also consent with them that practise them.

You are right, Calvinists do have tremendous flaws in their theology but then so do we all and I have found through the years that it does not help to point out peoples flaws or errors as some are just downright unteachable and others are extremely zealous for what they know.

For years, archeologists and historians said that the Bible is in error because they knew of no city named Calah.

Then, for several hundred years, no one but a select few even knew what was in these books, and transcribed them with errors.

Are you saying that the Bible is perfect, without error and no matter what we find in science, history, anthropology or anything else we are to look to the Bible as the final say?

If so, how do you know that errors didn't creep in to the original manuscripts, especially since we don't have them to verify?

How can we experience genuine joy and hope in the gospel of Jesus, knowing we have been forgiven of such grave errors and mistakes, while we withhold forgiveness from the parent that left us?

And again one by one — more vaguely it is true, yet all - inclusively — I call before me the whole vast anonymous army of living humanity; those who surround me and support me though I do not know them; those who come, and those who go; above all, those who in office, laboratory and factory, through their vision of truth or despite their error, truly believe in the progress of earthly reality and who today will take up again their impassioned pursuit of the light.

In my judgment this is the error of a great many of the exponents of what is nowadays known as «biblical theology.»

In my blog on Bobby Kennedy, I know I made one mistake, and at least two readers have written the editors (not me) to allege that I made another one, «a terrible error.»

I must concede this because regardless of my confidence in my reasoning, I can not know for certain and in order to maintain some smidgen of humility and intellectual integrity, I have to acknowledge the possibility of gross error on my part.

But the theological error that underlies this idealization of violence leads them into a new, a sociopolitical Manicheanism which (like the earlier, metaphysical Manicheanism) is also an idealism, a simplifying resource to help people participate in a complicated world where, they know, they had better do what the powers that be recommend and take sides.

Is the Catholic traditional interpretation of the Bible one of those which can be known on the basis of our present study of the Bible to be in serious error?

And regardless of what you believe about the violence of God in Scripture, these books will present you with a new way of looking at things so that you no longer have to choose between accepting that God is violent or writing off the Bible as hopelessly full of error.

You have pointed out one of the scientific errors in your old book - there are many, as well as purported moments of: «Aw, Gee, how'd he know that?»

I know Bootyfunk will show you the error in your response but I am curious: is the drivel you quoted in the part of The Babble christians no longer have to pay attention to, is it in the part all christians must follow or is it the part christians are allowed to pick and choose from?

I'm now saved (for the 1st time) because I have truly seen the error of my ways (Need of a Saviour), repented to God, turned from all known sin, and have trusted in Jesus Christ's atoning sacrifice as the only means of my salvation.

Francis Schaeffer, No Final Conflict: The Bible Without Error in All That It Affirms (Downers Grove, Ill.: Inter-Varsity Press.

No, to be in error or delusion is (quite un-Socratically) the thing they fear the least.

We also decided to hold off on naming the baby even if we knew the sex, just in case there was an error.

I am not interested in the narrow issue of who was to blame, but in suggesting to you that the present crisis of faith and life in the Church is not an incidental confusion, but the culmination of a long, slow crisis of truth and error in theology, perhaps the greatest since the rise of Arianism, and that we may no longer refuse to admit it, and to meet it.

I'm sure you already know this, but for the benefit of some readers, we may as well point out that multiple errors have been made in copying, whether by hand or press over the generations as well.

I think we know there are scribal errors in this bible of ours (no doubt from me)-- but I am yet to find a scribal error that changes the character of Jesus from what he claims to be to someone altogether different (ie: not the son of David or from Nazareth or hates Gentiles, etc) or changes his teachings from one thing to another (ie: we don't catch him stoning someone in adultery anywhere or cursing the roman guards for crucifying him).

Do you believe the bible is inerrant in the autographa and has been accurately copied down through the generations to the extent that we realize there are scribal errors but we pretty much know what they are?

The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.