Sentences with phrase «know the other person cares»

Despite my lack of interest in the day, it's always nice to see it acknowledged in some way... just to know the other person cares.

Not exact matches

Resilient people know that they rely on the love and care of others in their communities.

I want to be known as a disruptor who is affecting and impacting thousands of people by giving them water, food, financial services and health care to empower them to empower others.

This will demonstrate that you are engaged and care about what the other person is saying, but remember to make eye contact regularly so the speaker knows you're still with him or her.

However, if you want to let people know that you are maxed out on empathy, (and every other nerve is frazzled), the correct term would be «I couldn't care less.»

«If you know a lot about wine or nutrition or salsa dancing or email marketing or any of a million other subjects, people who care about that topic are sure to be interested in what you have to say.»

«If your employees are engaged and care about the company and its culture, and feel like they know what's happening», says Fradin, «then they become an advocate for the company — recruiting other people, talking positively about it, writing a review on Glassdoor.

I think that's the magic formula for success, because when people know that you care about them — in other words, genuinely — let's call it tough love.

Obamas religion however is straight up christian and it won't really do much good to follow him around with a moving billboard that lists death tolls from christian persecution or other things about the dogma that people already know and either don't care or already accept.

So, to me, Jesus would say that we as people should do whatever we need to do to care for each other, knowing that whatever we do to each other, we do to Him, and that he knows what happens to even to the least fortunate.

Now, Job after his bought with «pride» he ask YHWH for his forgiveness, and was later blessed with more sons and daughters who did the law, who were good children and an even better wife, and he lived for four generations of his children and their children, and died a very happy and fulfilled life, knowing that all of his family was left with love, and peace and togetherness among each other, now this is true life, living righteously and wholesome by ourselves and by others around us is what we are all suppose to live like, caring for your neighbors faithfully, and all be as one now not after it is too late but now we need the law of righteousness from YHWH, the 10 commandments, the sabbath, a day of rest, and the passover to remember the ones who died innocently, and to remember the freedom of our lives given by YHWH and do good by one another and not let each other fall, right now is what we need in this world today people.

It's interesting that poor people seem to get the tactics of Jesus a little better than people who have resources because they know that you have to take care of each other if you're gonna make it in this world.

I know christians personally who really do care about people, who will look out for others interests over their own.

Now if we had «better governments the actually did good things for «the people» no matter what country, somehow get the world population to hate lesss and care more for each other, mankind might have a chance.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place, humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.

obviously not, because they don't know or care if anyone else has peace or happiness or what is happening to other people and then they play the «religious order» card to justify it?

The boxes are filled with food, candles, cookies, some of our favorite Christmas books, Christmas ornaments, and numerous other items which we hope will help this lady and her daughter have a slightly better Christmas, and to know that there are people around her who love her and want to help care for her.

We're helping build community, a community where people know each other and care about each other, a community where people talk about inconsequential things as well as about really important things, including Jesus.

These, Charlie's, and many other similar cases I could recite, involving profoundly ill people of all ages, are examples of what is known in the bioethics trade as «futile care» or «medical futility» — or, as I call it, futile - care theory.

Because, Joshua, you and others mention him continuously despite the fact you know some other people don't care or want to hear about it.

However, the recent letter on pastoral care of homosexuals (already referred to), as well as the demand by the Vatican that ethicist Charles Curran retract his position on homosexuality and other sexual moral issues, or relinquish his position as a Catholic theologian, and its more recent order to me that I give up all ministry to homosexual persons, have convinced me that I can no longer in conscience remain silent.

A true pastor - teacher is one who knows the primary way of feeding and caring for his flock is through faithful and systematic teaching of Scripture, while at the same time, the teaching of Scripture is not an end in itself which is solely an academic pursuit, but is for the purpose of loving and caring for other people.

Those others you mentioned as god-less are no worse off then greedy capitalists who pretend to care about morality but shut their eyes to all injustice done to people which God hates, and has plenty to say about!

«Atheist» No, love is manifest in relationships between people who care deeply for each other.

When everyone is able to know and be friends with all of the other people involved in the disagreements, there is more potential for each person to see the others» point of view and to genuinely care about their issues when they may not have seemed important otherwise.

Others might disagree, finding Darwin's uninvolved God a rather bleak substitute for a providential God who knows the future, who actively cares for people every moment of their lives, and whose artistry and craftsmanship are clearly on display throughout the universe.

All of the Christians I know are very nice, friendly, caring people who are truly concerned for others, even if they don't share their views.

In contrast, two males who are in love and true and faithful to each other — or two females who are deeply committed in romance and in mutual care — well, enough of us now * know * people like that in our own churches and in our music ministries and among our sons and daughters that we instinctively hold back from hammering on the issue UNLESS we have a control complex or a deep personal sexual struggle.

I've known Jesus for as long as I've known my name, and still I use other people like capital to advance my own interest, still I gossip to make myself feel important, still I curse my brothers and sisters in one breath and sing praise songs in the next, still I sit in church with arms folded and cynicism coursing through my bloodstream, still I talk a big game about caring for the poor without doing much to change my own habits, still I indulge in food I'm not hungry for and jewelry I don't need, still I obsess over what people say about me on the internet, still I forget my own privilege, still I talk more than I listen and complain more than I thank, still I commit acts of evil, still I make a great commenter on Christianity and a lousy practitioner of it.

Along with restored hope came another miracle, Monville said: She no longer cared what other people thought.

We know we have landed in «religion» when we start demanding people give more, when we start caring about who gets credit, and when we try to exert control over other people.

When saying Merry Christmas has become a bad thing, when we can no longer have the peoples vote counted and respected by judges and elected officials, when health care for aids and other associated dieses is covered, when kids in school have to be subjected to demonstrations of gay bedroom life when the mayor of NY will no longer without reason and against the law rent churches public buildings, when teen pregnancies up 45 percent will be paid for by us the people of the US with all the cost completely covered.

You know what I don't understand, why anyone cares about who other people sleep with.

Ok now I know most atheists are live and let live and couldn't care less about what other people believe, but whenever you get defensive and wonder why «theists» often call atheism just as much a religion as Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc look at things like this.

And the louder you proclaim your faith to be, the more people will know that all you care about is how you're perceived by others.

Kind of wish I could find a congregation of people who really do know God as a living being, their source of daily light and advice, who love each other and take care of the poor and widows — all the stuff the churches to do well but without the stuff the churches shouldn't middle in but do.

As well as sharing in God's work of creating people, husbands and wives also have a share in God's work of bringing them to salvation, bringing them into union with Christ in the Church by getting them baptised, bringing them to be fed by Christ in the Eucharist and to be cared for by him in the other sacraments; bringing them to know and love God through teaching, prayer, bible reading and example.

We have it right in our eight points that we care about how people treat each other, but you know that our critics are using a code word.

When I imagined what it would be like to give generously without wondering what is in it for me, to give up my grudges and learn to diffuse hatred with love, to stop judging other people once and for all, to care for the poor and seek out the downtrodden, to finally believe that stuff can't make me happy, to give up my urge to gossip and manipulate, to worry less about what other people think, to refuse to retaliate no matter the cost, to be capable of forgiving to the point of death, to live as Jesus lived and love as Jesus loved, one word came to my mind: liberation.

Such directives, which encompass the well «known «living will» as well as documents assigning health care decision making to a family member or others, are designed to allow a person to refuse even life «saving treatment or medical care if the person becomes mentally incapacitated.

i used to be a nurse in palliative care and one of the other nurses told me that the most afraid person they ever saw who was ill was a catholic priest so they know who they are and what they do.

But assuming they are wrong, it only proves there is a large group of people out in the world still that want desperately to believe in something greater than themselves and, most importantly, care enough about others to sacrifice of their own comforts to make sure others at least know about it and can decide for themselves.

But other people I know don't care too much for them — I don't understand that at all!?? Mireya @myhealthyeatinghabits

My idea of a hero is a student / individual who: «cents Helps a person with special needs «cents Takes time to talk to the new kid «cents Asks someone how they are doing «cents Stands up for those who aren't strong enough to do so themselves «cents Makes sure others know that they care about them «cents Is a leader who sets an example that treating others negatively is wrong «cents Isn't a follower when others are being treated unfairly

Joel Campbell is good but arsenal fans never cease to amaze me.They never make up their mind they wait for the player to have a dip in form and then insult and criticize him and say childish things.Then when he does well they pretend like they were always in support of him.I remember always saying here first that Szczesny is a better goalkeeper than Ospina.I also proudly defended Szczesny everytime they aimed at him.How i wish he started at Chelsea or any other team and i bet you he would not be this error prone.I know forever he will always be better than Ospina and that is a fact not even an opinion.For Campbell vs Ox its there for everyone to see Ox would eventually win the battle come one day.But injuries have made him so unlucky.He should go to Chelsea where he would be better taken care of and would make people eat their words.

Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility

Sanchez is world class but people look down on other players too much.Most of us here didn't even know he was this good until he was given the chance here.How do you know another player can't replace him and can't do better if given the opportunity?If I was Wenger I would've sold him to City long ago last season.I don't care if it would've been a Van Persie situation.All Utd needed was a decent striker to help them win the league but they got lucky and had a world class one.Utd were even favourites to win it prior to that season and if I'm not mistaken City beat them by only 1 point to win it.

I know one person who will not care less if it's the Spuds or Leicester or any other team than Arsenal team lifting the trophy.

We split everything, time with our kids 50/50 no matter what, money, and NEVER put shit on the other person, when you split, you cared about them... a little respect... people take sides, its human nature, sure confide in your friends, but like it or not you still have to work hard on bringing up your kids, and you need each other to do it.