Sentences with phrase «know the other person first»

You might be looking to meet potential matches right away or you might want to get to know the other person first.
Yes I am still sexualy active but would like to get to know the other person first.

Not exact matches

I've often heard it said that «To be a good leader, be a good follower first», then you know how it feels to be in the other person's shoes.
The wealthiest and most successful people know that the keys to any negotiation are threefold: First, understand what the other side really wants.
«For the first 20 years of being in business, I had an underlying feeling that other people knew more than me.
Most people know to say the other person's name first when it happens at the beginning of the sentence; «David and I went to the meeting.»
You probably know to use the other person's name first when it comes at the beginning of a sentence, such as «Brandon and I put the presentation together.»
Many of the people she interviewed in Jamaica and Antigua - where the two shooters first met - also testified, including Malvo's father, Leslie, his schoolteachers from Jamaica and the US, and others who knew him from his childhood.
In other words, saying no the first time actually made people more likely to say yes the second time, even though the two favors were equally small.
One of the first steps to making friends is to know what the other person likes.
We've known each other for about twenty - five years, meeting in our first jobs out of undergrad as management consultants on the same four person team, back in Boston.
I was more ashamed of my Goodwill clothes than of not speaking English when I first came to America, because I knew that one day I would speak English well, but I did not know whether I would ever have what other people had — the material wealth that made them happy.
nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place, humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.
In the first place it is no longer necessary to teach other people the faith, to explain it to them and convince them; it becomes acceptable to make people believe with the sword.
People have rejected theism because they held untenable the idea of a mind not subject to change or to interaction with other beings, or a mind omnipotent in the sense that its power was all the power in existence, or a mind having precise knowledge of details of the future (or of all times from the standpoint of eternity), or a mind creating a first state of the cosmos at a finite time in the past, or knowing all suffering although it did not itself suffer, or an all - embracing mind which in no sense could be identified with the universe, or one which could in every sense be identified with it.
Case in point: I have actually had the Lord SAY things to me that some other person I met somewhere else had an exact same story of the Lord saying the exact same freaky thing to them — and I KNOW this person didn't know my story, and now I'm feeling I'd be illegitimate to tell him that the Lord spoke the exact same thing to me, because he shared his story fiKNOW this person didn't know my story, and now I'm feeling I'd be illegitimate to tell him that the Lord spoke the exact same thing to me, because he shared his story fiknow my story, and now I'm feeling I'd be illegitimate to tell him that the Lord spoke the exact same thing to me, because he shared his story first.
I know many things about religion but like the first few questions that ask about your knowledge on other people like Mother Teresa, etc., then that's 50 - 50 for me right there, right on the average.
the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.
Deuteronomy 13:6 - 10 «If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you... Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
Before Islam they worship idols After worshiping the one absolute God Before Islam they didn't know Jesus or Mary or any prophets After Islam who deny Jesus or Mary become blasphemer Before no payers no charity no family relation After Islam it become must Before Islam us - u-ry and slavery adultery was common After Islam got forbidden Before Islam women has no value and all her property to her husband After Islam become her own she can do what she like within Islamic laws Before Islam the girls - child were buried alive After Islam no girls - child were buried alive Before Islam no laws or guidance to people After Islam established the laws or guidance to people (sharia) Before Islam tribes killing each others After Islam they became brothers Before Islam there was no education After Islam became must and first word came to Muhammad from the angle was (read) Before Islam no scientific study After Islam seculars in chemistry and math the no. 1234 are Arabic and innovated the ZERO Before Islam they were tribes After Islam became empire from Spain to china And More.......
If indeed people who have had a common experience find the past difficult to retrieve, how much more so those who never knew each other in the first place.
«If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you... Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz
Even before we get to Genesis we have to first find out 1) what is God and 2) what does «existence» mean and 3) does God exist, we have not done any of these we just assumed that the other person knows what we mean by these terms, a dangerous assumption at best.
Perhaps CNN should say «Act Christian», since it's how a person treats others (the golden rule) that marks the difference — even the devil knows Scripture — but he doesn't act Christian, since he isn't, and as Scripture says, that's how to determine whether a person is Christian or not, and that is by their «first fruits» or how they act towards others...
As I understand it, Alan Guth's work, and that of others exploring the first microseconds of what people of biblical faith know as Creation, builds on Lemaître's insights.
Well I do suffer from chronic depression, and I have had a lot of contact with others who have as well, so I know first hand that it IS NOT completely out of the person's control.
«Mormons claim to «know» that God Himself, in person, said that all other religions are «an abomination» (Google Joseph Smith's first vision.)»
on Gays... he said, «Well the «Scripture» says...» on the death penalty he got the phony smile and said... «Well other people know lots more than me... so I don't have an opinion»... The guy is completely hollow... I hope he helps the poor but I doubt it... he is a RIGHT WINGED Fundamentalist in T V «clothing»... he would be the first to show up at a town hanging and grin... and pass the hat...
First, with regard to confessing sins we do not know about and did not do intentionally, in fact, of course, we do often hurt other people without intending to and sometimes without even knowing.
I've always maintained my stance that Arsene Wenger loves French players in his team than any other players.No matter how average you are once you're French and once you're in the first team he tends to give you so many chances to prove yourself.I can start mentioning them if you want me to but I know you know them.If Lucas Perez was French he wouldn't have been out so early believe me.I just don't know where to begin.Was Giroud bought to become a super sub or to be the leading striker?Having giving us many sesons of failure people are now content with him being a so called super sub.A player like Giroud is not built for that kind of role.He ws a super sub in 99 % of those matches because he was not played when he was supposed to and we needed presence in the air.The funny thing is people are using only this season to label him as a super sub.There were so many matched that Wenger should have started Giroud but for some reason didn't start him.I only see Arsenal as the top club who'd be crying over Giroud.If a good offer comes we should sell.
Joel Campbell is good but arsenal fans never cease to amaze me.They never make up their mind they wait for the player to have a dip in form and then insult and criticize him and say childish things.Then when he does well they pretend like they were always in support of him.I remember always saying here first that Szczesny is a better goalkeeper than Ospina.I also proudly defended Szczesny everytime they aimed at him.How i wish he started at Chelsea or any other team and i bet you he would not be this error prone.I know forever he will always be better than Ospina and that is a fact not even an opinion.For Campbell vs Ox its there for everyone to see Ox would eventually win the battle come one day.But injuries have made him so unlucky.He should go to Chelsea where he would be better taken care of and would make people eat their words.
Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility
first of all i have never said they are «idiots»... i said regular visitors don't protest second i am in india doesn't mean i never go to uk and never attend matches at emirates third u own the website doesn't mean only u have the right to say anything and criticize others, ppl who comment here are also equally part of this website's success fourth i know u can't handle criticism and will ban me so please go on, there are lots of fan run websites where dictators are not on the prowl
And I know that plenty of Arsenal fans have been on the back of Jack Wilshere as well, just as they were with Aaron Ramsey, but we are allowed because we are also the first to stick up for our players when other people give them grief.
I also feel relieved to know I'm not alone but also was hoping to find at least one person who was able to turn this horrible situation around... I've been with my husband for almost six years and the first two we couldn't keep our hands off each other... we would have all kinds of sex everywhere even in public places... as soon as I moved in with him he lost all desire to be with me sexually....
And speaking as someone who's just moved into the next phase (separated five months but only just filed yesterday), even if there's no fighting going on, even if it's the most amicable and collaborative divorce anyone you know has ever seen... if you didn't want to get one and would give anything if the other person had just been able to take those first steps to getting on the right path again and walk it together, then there's nothing about it that's going to feel «easy» no matter how you slice it.
As a first time mum, I knew in my heart what to do and the instinct was strong but sometimes other people or books would contradict what I felt.
First, some people use the term «known donors» to mean what other people think of as «co-parenting».
But I also know (first hand) there's mostly just a lot of really skillful, intentional curation happening — through pictures, through collages, through ideas put forth about other people's families.
My husband is the only other person who recognizes those first words our toddler is attempting that sound like gibberish to everyone else, the only other person who knows which bedtime books he needs on any particular day, or whether he's asking for snacks out of hunger or boredom.
The other thing that I would add that I wish I had known the first time in first 24 hours was asking for help and that it's okay to admit that you are having a hard time and that there are people there to help you and to seek out that help.
One of my favorite things about camp is that everyone loves each other no matter what; whether it's your first day or you've known someone you're whole life, you have a life long bond with these people and this organization.
I knew I wasn't the first (or the most qualified) person to ever undertake this, but I could represent your average midwife who always took other people's word that the safety of what I was doing was backed by evidence.
This time round, I want to make sure that other than immediate family, we take the first week to just all get to know each other as a family before we start having people over.
CHELSEA POWELL: For me I think I kind of found it through two different ways and the we took a like a you know a class for our birth and the other couples in the class the other moms in the group where just people that were we were all similar in age and just you know it was all our first kids and kind of similar life paths and what we were how we were wanting to like birth our children and we kind of raise them.
I feel that women and their partners do much better with privacy and intimacy during the birth process and that, my role is to sometimes protect that privacy and intimacy first of all by educating them that that might be really important and to talk about you know the effect both positive and negative about um, support during that time can be or even just letting people know hey, we're in labour, the Facebook kind of thing but you know keep it quiet, keep it down, don't fritter the energy away by drawing other people to it or drawing the expectation that something's happening rather than just letting something evolve... I think guarding the space by keeping the space as calm and quiet and private as possible is key and giving people tools to do that during the prenatal time to deal with over eager family members or friends.
They're just diapers people, calm down... Everything was a learning process for me at first, but we got our proper fitting diapers finally, we wash them with a great working routine, if I hear advice that makes me have a second thought (or really just sounds off, like the CLR bit), I just pass... And I don't preach as I know my advice might not go well for others.
I don't remember the first time I nursed in public but I'm somebody who's very confident and it's so important to me for something to be convenient and so sometimes with certain things I don't have time to be nervous and worrying about what's going to happen, you know.Sometimes I have other family members that are like, «oh be careful», but it's not for me it's for the other people who are uncomfortable, you know.
Whenever I meet someone for the first time, I can almost instantly know how much compassion that person has for others.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z