Sentences with phrase «know the real numbers»

The privacy protection is bi-directional, so recipients don't know the real numbers of callers, either, Cerda notes.
And the caveat to all of this is: OP is the only one who knows the real numbers / rates.
There are, by HSUS's estimate, about 10,000 puppy mills in America, though the organization concedes that no one knows the real number: It's an industry born and raised in shadows.
Let's suppose this position is correct, but when creating the global average I cut the percentage of rural stations in the measurement network from 75 % to 25 % (sorry don't know the real numbers).
I doubt there's any way to know the real numbers for sure.
Knowing the real numbers can help you with your purchase planning.
I'll let you know the real number next time I'm in a hurry to get somewhere.
95 % of the time they stretch the numbers but once in a great while they «shrink» the numbers because they don't know the real numbers and it works to your advantage.

Not exact matches

Even though debate rages over whether the tech talent shortage is real or a myth in terms of raw numbers, tech companies know this: good programmers and good designers are definitely hard to find.
«I don't know [the Ukrainian blog's] exact calculations, they just threw out the 100,000 number,» Tack said, adding that they basically figured Moscow would pack each rail cars to the brim with 72 soldiers, and that they multiplied the final number by 1.5 times on the assumption that the Kremlin was keeping the real number of rail cars secret.
Because you know, if you look at the real numbers, had I not won, had the Democrat won — I'm going to be nice — the Democrat, I say, won — I would consider their last quarter my first quarter.
None of that's actually true — employment numbers are up and violent crime is down — but that Trump believes misogyny and sexual violence are «a distraction» implies he doesn't know all that much about real America after all.
The company began showing them the real numbers — sales, costs, profits, and so on — along with virtually every other piece of information they might want to know.
I would like to get to your level however, and I'd be very interested to know of any books or other resources which you have found useful, specifically with regards to adjusting earnings numbers to the more real earnings numbers.
Marketers know that computing real social ROI is more than vanity metrics on numbers of followers and likes.
Du n no about number 1, my guess is because there isn't a better cheaper alternative yet... I do nt think online selling platforms would work as well for real estate auctions.
Valeant could no longer hide losses with non-GAAP metrics and, ultimately these non-GAAP numbers could not pay the real bills.
Investors have long known AWS was the fastest - growing part of Amazon, but seeing real numbers may lead some investors to call for it to be spun off into a separate company.
I had seen a number of his earlier films at Paris Cinematheque and was very curious to get to know a real - live Soviet artist.
What we meant to model was the sending of one of our number to be a foreign missionary — to learn a new language, to understand a local culture, to sacrifice the amenities of affluence and to live knowing that he or she is always being watched by seekers — while the rest of us stay here as lifetime local missionaries, learning to speak the language of the unchurched, understanding secular culture, sacrificing the amenities of affluence and living as a «watched» person in a society that is skeptical of Christian spirituality until it sees the real thing on display.
I, on the other hand, actually look at the real numbers... you know... scientific numbers.
It surveyed a number of modern moral theories known as proportionalism or consequentialism, as well as arguments that the real subject matter of moral reflection should be the inner state of the individual rather than his outward behavior.
I mean heck, my Million Dollar Zoodle Baked Spaghetti is literally the number one recipe on my site, but sometimes you just need real pasta in your life, ya know?
Moving on to the list — at Number 5, We have Michy Batshuayi; I know I spoke at length about signing youngsters, but this kid look like a real talent.
However without seeing the player for real, I think I would still prefer for Arsenal to look no further than Stoke City's Jack Butland as the next potential Arsenal number one.
Let's get real here.It is very unlikely that ANY professional player will ever say anything derogatory about a teammate that has just left the club.If Jack had said about Coq - «Grew up playing with him in the Youth Team and have fond memories of a player they though he had very limited ability he always gave his all.Very surprised and disappointed the club never invested in a World Class defensive midfielder that we have quite obviously been lacking for a number of seasons and would no doubt have improved the defensive weakness we have shown over a number of seasons» we would have echoed his thoughts entirely.If he had said about Theo - «A player who should have been so much better than he ended up being.He had everything needed to be a prolific player for our club but I can understand the fans frustrations with his continued lack - lustre performances and total lack of a football brain.I think this is best explained by the managers preference to play a player of such limited ability as Alex Iwobi in front of Theo pretty much says it all» we again would have all nodded our agreement.Although Jack never mentioned Alexis Sanchez I would imagine something along the lines of «If the Manager had not persisted with players with such limited ability such as Francis and Theo and instead bought the world class players needed into the club then Sanchez would still most likely be here.The fans must wonder what the hell goes on at the club as they pay fortunes for the privalage of following our club but it seems the millions generated ends up purchasing a new Texas Ranch for the Owner or in a yearly renumeration of # 9million pounds to our manager».
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Reus is predominantly used by boss Jurgen Klopp in a supporting striker role but is a hugely adept finisher who's versatility has led to interest from a number of Europe's «Elite» with the likes of Real Madrid and Barcelona known to be admirers.
It's hard to talk specific numbers without actually being in the know, but I can only assume nobody was willing to pay a fee Porto considered fair last summer — everybody thought Wolves got a steal when it was announced because surely somebody else would have paid at least # 25M or # 30M or whatever, but the only real leap you can make from that is that whatever Porto believe his real value is wasn't met and that going this route hedges their bet.
Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste
They have a number of promising young centre backs who ought to be given an opportunity to prove themselves for the remainder of the season in the EPL matches.They simply can not be worse than the rapidly declining Koscielny and Mustafi who can not cope with the likes of Swansea, Bournemouth etc. let alone a team like Spurs.The lack of steel at the back impacts on our more attacking players as they know they need to score 2/3 goals to have any chance of producing a win.As usual Elneny has come in for criticism but the real culprits are our centre backs and Xhaka who seems to be a fixture regardless of being bang average.
It's either we're starting a season with just one fit defender (then using other makeshift players to augment the defence for a number of games; and by the time the real defenders are back and fit, the season is all but over for us), or we start a season without a recognisable striker (after losing our striker to injury, knowing he would return 6 weeks or more into the campaign), or we commence a season without any true DM (well, it's like that dm position isn't ever going to be sorted out).
We love when someone like Seahawks receiver / return man Tyler Lockett finds success as a middle - round pick because it seemed obvious Lockett would succeed when he posted huge numbers at Kansas State despite opposing defenses knowing he was the only real downfield threat.
«You see guys that you have heard about or played against and you know there's a good chance that someone is going to put up a real low number that day.
Casillas had been Spain's undisputed number one goalkeeper for years, even when he had been dropped at Real Madrid, but a series of subpar performances over the past couple of years, combined with the magnificent last few seasons David de Gea has had, meant that Del Bosque could not ignore the fact that 35 year old was no longer the best goalkeeper in the squad.
I wish I could read the paper and dive deeper and know for sure, but when you take an overall condition with no association with procedure X, and then break that condition down into smaller bits and find a bit that does have an association with procedure X, I want to take a closer look at the numbers to make sure it's real and not spurious.
The Healthy and Hunger - Free Kids Act, as the Senate bill is known, is also unpopular with people who think adding about 6 cents per lunch is not nearly enough to update an outmoded program — people like real food pioneer Alice Waters, who thinks the number should be more like $ 5 more per lunch.
«I know, in some parts of the country, there is a real concern about numbers from Europe and the pressures placed on services and wages.
So I don't know if your statement about Republicans paying more in taxes is accurate — anyone out there have some real numbers?
The results surprised me, but the authors have actual real - live numbers to back them up — and we all know that Math Never Lies.
All «Page Six» knows about Spitzer's «mystery girlfriend» is her occupation (and that she is seemingly is okay with his past indiscretions), but the gossip column notes that at the very least, the new couple has a lot to talk about, since Spitzer has been involved in a number of real - estate deals lately.
«Numbers to know» is a weekly web feature that catalogues the most notable, quirky and surprising real estate statistics.
«If you want to know should I shut down this school or not, having real - time access to the influenza numbers could be very useful,» he says.
«These are just the animals we know about, and the real number leaving the country annually might be much higher.
Even if we believe that the laws of physics in principle determine the evolution of some particular state of the universe with perfect fidelity, we don't know what that state is, and in the real world the increase of entropy is consistent with any number of possible futures.
At the time, mathematicians knew that «the real numbers are bigger than the natural numbers, but not how much bigger.
Everyone knows fossil fuels come from long - dead plants, but Jeffrey Dukes wanted real numbers: How much plant matter does it take to make a gallon of gasoline?
We wanted to know what information you use to decide if a face is real or artificial, since that first step determines a number of judgments that follow.»
In defending that statement, he writes in his rebuttal that «Of course, there are a lot of numbers that we do not know well, but the general idea in statistics is that if these numbers have been generated by a process described by evenly distributed errors, the more precise number is still the best predictor of the real number...» (It goes on.)
The sensitivity and reproducibility of real - time PCR for each target gene were determined by spiking normal tissue samples with known numbers of spirochetes to establish standard curves.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z