Sentences with phrase «knower of»

The knower of all things:) I'm so like you, I'm a major weeper (to steal a line from «The Holiday») too.

«I am also seen as the Indigenous knowledges expert, the «knower of all things Aboriginal».

Capacity building while framed around «good intent» and benevolence to the blacks, will also work to insist that you remain the «subject» of research, and never the knower of your experience.

In the middle of the Retreat you will enjoy a fire ceremony performed by a special Shaman, a great knower of the Mayan Calendar.

I had a chat with my girl Holly Grigg - Spall, author of Sweetening the Pill, and knower of all things Daysy, and she answered the big questions on my (and every woman's) mind.

Knower of football things.

The causal determinist maintains that the future relative to any moment is fully determinate at that moment and is predictable on the ground of natural regularities by any perfect knower of the initial conditions and relevant laws.

(5) Such is the Knower of the Invisible and the Visible, the Mighty, the Merciful, (6).

And Allah setteth forth for mankind similitudes, for Allah is Knower of all things.

Who appointed you the knower of all things?

Niebuhr recognized this complexity when he wrote in his essay The Purpose of the church and its Ministry: Reflections on the Aims of Theological Education (New York: Harper and Row, 1956), 26, «The world is sometimes enemy, sometimes partner of the Church, often antagonist, always one to be befriended; now the one that does not know what Church knows, now the knower of what the Church does not know,» 13.

Surely each one knoweth his prayer and his hallowing; and Allah is the Knower of that which they do.

The world is sometimes enemy, sometimes partner of Church, often antagonist, always one to be befriended; now it is the co-knower, now the one that does not know what Church knows, now the knower of what Church does not know.

(25)(He is) the Knower of the Unseen, and He revealeth unto none His secret, (26) Save unto every messenger whom He hath chosen, and then He maketh a gu - ard to go before him and a gu - ard behind him (27) That He may know that they have indeed conveyed the messages of their Lord.

Not only because they can only be known if they are brought together by this one cognition under definite common formal principles, but also9 because cognition rightly understood is not simply the conscious taking cognizance by a knower of an object which confronts the process of cognition in a completely external and uninvolved way.

----- So I answer her and you, knower of all things, guru of my life experiences, the man with the crystal ball, ---- wait a minute; are you telling me as I describe my relationship with God that I haven't had an actual experience, as I describe to Lynn with God?

Thou, only Thou, art the Knower of Things Hidden?

I Let us follow John Wilcox in defining temporalistic or process theism as any theism which portrays God as an experiencing subject, the knower of temporal processes, whose knowledge is itself subject to growth, expanding along with the growth in temporal reality which is the object of that knowledge (2:295 a).

God is the creator of all things and the knower of all things.

Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen» (109)[The Day] when Allah will say, «O Jesus, Son of Mary, remember My favor upon you and upon your mother when I supported you with the Pure Spirit and you spoke to the people in the cradle and in maturity; and [remember] when I taught you writing and wisdom and the Torah and the Gospel; and when you designed from clay [what was] like the form of a bird with My permission, then you breathed into it, and it became a bird with My permission; and you healed the blind and the leper with My permission; and when you brought forth the dead with My permission; and when I restrained the Children of Israel from [killing] you when you came to them with clear proofs and those who disbelieved among them said, «This is not but obvious magic.»

Just as Hartshorne claimed that God is not only the knower of all, but known by all, he now claims that God not only causes all (in a supreme but non-determinative sense), but is the supreme effect of all.

Knower of all secrets and declarations, He is the Most Wise, the Cognizant.

i hope one day the entire earth will have only one faith and that will be «There is no one worthy of worship except One who is unseen and knower of everything and Muhammad, Jesus, Moses Abraham are all prophets of God»...

Had I known you «great knowers of the universe» were holding all the absolute answers I would have given up on the faith that lead me to peace, happiness and compassion long ago.

And what is hilarious, is that in the case of all those gods, be they current religions, cults or dead pantheons, they all had, in their time, believers who fervently believed that THAY were the only knowers of the truth, just as you are now.

The Hendrick's Ambassadors hold highly important roles, serving as gin specialists, mixology masters, and knowers of all things hospitality — tending events, tastings and educational opportunities in all regards.

Not exact matches

He introduced the knower into the world of nature.

Later the idea gained ground that we can not «speak of nature apart from human perception in the historical development of knowledge», that all knowledge is «a creative interaction between the known and the knower» and that therefore there is no System of scientific knowledge or of technology which does not have the subjective purposes and faith - presuppositions of humans built into it.

Nevertheless, his work of that period left many readers with the impression that nature and its structures are ontologically autonomous and also that the knower may be understood as a part of nature.

Many of the Names are difficult to translate from the Arabic, for example, Allah is the One, the Eternally Besought of All, the First, the Last, the Beneficent, the Powerful, the Almighty, the Wise, the Knower, the Creator, the Shaper out of Naught, the Fashioner, the Guardian, the Majestic, thc Superb, the Glorified.

Its intent is neither to deepen the personality of the knower nor to enhance the charm, autonomy, dignity, and mystery of the known.

In thomistic terms, form - as - intellectual - species is a «likeness» of the knowable thing, ordered towards the same, and adequate to the knower's task of knowing.

The other solution was to say clearly that, Yes, the knower is also a being, and then to think of that being in analogy with tables and stones.

If one still wanted to know about the knower and the knower's experience, this could be treated in a secondary way as a particular form of the body or a relation of the body to external objects.

And there can be no efficacy in a systematic philosophy that loses sight of the vocation of the human knower to the whole of reality.

Just as we would say that the person in the Chinese Box has no real knowledge of Chinese, Hartshorne would say that God does not have real knowledge of the world unless God is a sympathetic knower.

Part of the impetus for the idea of divine relativity comes from Hartshorne's interpretation of the Thomistic theory of knowledge in which the knower is in an internal cognitive relation to the known.

This point of the knower's being the knowledge while not being aware of itself is central to the epochal theory of time, and the theory of prehension.

A driving force in this tradition has been the philosophical «turn to the subject,» a shift of focus from the thing known to the knower who knows it.

These are «limit - experiences,» places that usually test the integrity and purpose of knowers and the durability and responsiveness of their knowing.

Among the most important dimensions of this critique is its insistence that knower and «knowee» are, in relation to one another and before God, both subjects and objects.

Insulated by the wealth of possibilities the privileges of power confer, powerful knowers can ignore limits and resolve ambiguities.

She calls it «strong objectivity,» and its particular strength rests of the participation of many knowers, beginning with the least favored, and requires a commitment to critical examination of the causes of beliefs, especially those that pass for «objective truths.

Fueled by this suspicion, it questions the legitimacy of the powerful as knowers and their right to decide who is and is not «one of them.»

-- power - knowers read these as humiliations rather than as features of the daily human landscape that should require only sobriety, not courage, to acknowledge.

To begin with, an epistemology of the cross can not be used by knowers whose claims to objectivity are predicated on domination, for it harbors a deep suspicion of power - based knowledge claims and those who make them.

«7 It challenges the definition of power as domination and insists on the partialness of what can be known by any of its knowers and / or by all of us together.

These knowers occupy epistemological standpoints that are salutary precisely because of, and almost in direct relation to.

In the former the knower can not be merely a detached scientific observer but must also himself participate, for it is through his participation that he discovers both the typical and the unique in the aspects of human life that he is studying.

The knower, to be sure, must enter with his whole being into what he knows; he must bring unabridged into the act of knowing the experience which his binding with the situation presents him.