The other reason that I write this, is that it is possible to get significant
knowledge as an amateur, and on a book basis, as good as many professionals.
Not exact matches
playing
amateur sociologist of
knowledge, I think some of this denial of the global comes from their general philosophical commitment to free markets, assumptions which tend to view only the individual
as real, making larger institutions or «systems» metaphysical (an illusory abstraction).
I agree with most of what she says about the growth of scientific
knowledge and,
as far
as I can tell
as an
amateur, her views are broadly consistent with current epistemology.