Not exact matches
Whilst working within the Clinical
Negligence Department, Rachel has gained extensive knowledge and experience dealing with a wide variety of clinical negligence claims ranging from orthopaedic claims, misdiagnosis claims, pressure sore claims, gynaelogical claims, mis - prescription claims and surgical n
Negligence Department, Rachel has gained extensive
knowledge and experience dealing with a wide variety
of clinical
negligence claims ranging from orthopaedic claims, misdiagnosis claims, pressure sore claims, gynaelogical claims, mis - prescription claims and surgical n
negligence claims ranging from orthopaedic
claims, misdiagnosis
claims, pressure sore
claims, gynaelogical
claims, mis - prescription
claims and surgical
negligencenegligence.
The experienced attorneys at SL Chapman have the
knowledge to properly evaluate your injury and determine if your
claim involves strict liability,
negligence, or a breach
of warranty.
Crucial to the dismissal
of the
negligence claim were findings that the claimants were sophisticated businessmen who understood the expense and risk
of litigation, and had sufficient personal
knowledge to appreciate the quantum
of damages they could reasonably expect to recover.
At Eisen Law in Toronto, we pride ourselves on our specialized
knowledge in pursuing
claims of negligence against lawyers.
When issues are disputed, our intellectual property specialists will help using their extensive
knowledge of settling domain name, breach
of contract, infringement and
negligence claims.
It attracts particular praise for its «skilful handling»
of collision incidents and its «in - depth
knowledge of both shipping - related incidents concerning vessel operators and ship's crew
negligence which results personal injury
claims».
In most personal injury and clinical
negligence claims (not including
claims for children or patients), usually the
Claim Form must be received by the Court within 3 years
of the date
of the negligent event or three years from the date
of knowledge of the event (sometimes this can be years after the event).
With this background in mind, Mr. Santana has firsthand
knowledge of how best to approach such
claims against those same kinds
of institutions on behalf
of his clients when they have been injured due to another's
negligence.
Medical malpractice
claims are some
of the most complicated personal injury
claims to bring, based solely on the complexity
of medicine and the amount
of knowledge required to properly pinpoint whether
negligence actually occurred.
By contrast, if constructive
knowledge is accepted at trial as being sufficient to ground a
claim in
negligence, then the
negligence claim offers the plaintiffs the possibility
of 100 % recovery upon proof
of mere constructive, as opposed to actual,
knowledge.
As a result
of Justice Horkins» decision, the
negligence claim based on constructive
knowledge, as well as the other causes
of action pleaded, will proceed as a class action.
It argued that the Texas Tort
Claims Act didn't waive the county's governmental immunity for the plaintiff's negligence claims because the claims didn't involve the use or condition of personal property, and the law didn't waive immunity for the premises liability claim because the evidence showed the county didn't have actual knowledge about the
Claims Act didn't waive the county's governmental immunity for the plaintiff's
negligence claims because the claims didn't involve the use or condition of personal property, and the law didn't waive immunity for the premises liability claim because the evidence showed the county didn't have actual knowledge about the
claims because the
claims didn't involve the use or condition of personal property, and the law didn't waive immunity for the premises liability claim because the evidence showed the county didn't have actual knowledge about the
claims didn't involve the use or condition
of personal property, and the law didn't waive immunity for the premises liability
claim because the evidence showed the county didn't have actual
knowledge about the water.
«Ed Pepperall QC is highlighted as «an outstandingly clever guy» recognised for his wealth
of knowledge on
negligence claims relating to fraudulent behaviour and contractual issues.»
By contrast, in a
claim for personal injuries based on
negligence, LA 1980 provides that the primary limitation period is three years from the date
of accrual
of the cause
of action / date
of the claimant's majority / date
of the claimant's
knowledge, whichever
of these is the later.
The trustees» subsequent discovery
of the unlawfulness
of the transfers was treated by the judge — applying Bradstock Trustee Services Ltd v Nabarro Nathanson (a firm)[1995] 4 All ER 888 with the apparent assistance
of a concession by the claimant's counsel — as the discovery that the facts which they already knew gave rise to a
negligence claim and that, by virtue
of LA 1980, s 14A (9), this is excluded from the definition
of knowledge required for the occurrence
of the starting date under LA 1980, s 14A.
Professional Indemnity Insurance covers business owners who sell their skills or
knowledge in the event
of a
negligence claim as a result
of services they have provided to a third party.
The Court stated that «in a lead paint poisoning
claim based on
negligence, a plaintiff must identify admissible evidence that, if believed, would prove that the landlord (1) had actual
knowledge or reason to know
of chipping, peeling, and flaking lead paint on the premises and that such a condition was hazardous, and (2) the landlord was given a reasonable opportunity to correct the hazard.»