Marrying my first - hand
knowledge of living through relocations and all that accompanies «transitions», plus questioning what «career path» to take, benefits the clientele I serve today.
Not exact matches
«Apple Inc. has suspended plans to offer a
live Internet - based television service and is instead focusing on being a platform for media companies to sell directly to customers
through its App Store, according to a person with
knowledge of the matter.»
Our witness is that God is aware
of and appreciates
life; is especially fond
of life that is self - aware, learns and shares
knowledge through generations, and is aware
of God; and God desires contact and relationship with such
life.
It's an example
of why to certain believers the reason why we are placed into this world
of such trials and sufferings that it is because this
life on Earth is a testing period to see if we are going to follow God not because we are obligated to having full
knowledge but due to our own free will
through relying on faith.
«It is as we feed on the Word and meditate on the message it contains that the Spirit
of God can vitalize that which we have received, and bring forth
through us the word
of knowledge that will be as full
of power and
life as when He, the Spirit
of God, moved upon holy men
of old and gave them these inspired Scriptures.»
As to those who may have gone
through life without any feasible
knowledge of God, those individuals would still have an opportunity to learn and choose whether or not to accept the newly received gospel as spirits after death.
Bu tthe effort
of trying to
live a good christian
life got to much ad i was disollutioned.Spent ten years as a backslidden barely believing christian and then in recent years as a transformed renewed Christian and i finally got it.It is all about a relationship with Jesus Christ and working in submission to the holy spirit he is the one that inspires his word he brings it to
life.If you want to understand the word we must apply it to our
lives then it becomes part
of us thats the difference between
knowledge and understanding not just knowing the word but
living the word.The bible is a book useful for
living not just a theoretical analysis or a history book.Jesus is the
living word its
through him that he opens his word to us without the holy spirit in us the carnal mind can not comprehend Gods word it a mystery.It was designed that way so only those who are truly seeking God shall find him.brentnz
* worship God, whose will is and who has always yearned for us to...... be free and independent;... think;... be curious;... be intelligent and wise;... value
knowledge over ignorance and compassion over
knowledge;... be creative;... grow and mature;...
live long healthy satisfying
lives;...
live non-violently without vengeance;... be generous;... be hospitable;... be compassionate;... do no harm;... heal and rehabilitate and restore;... forgive and reconcile and include all and have all participate;... be good stewards
of all resources;...
live here and now as one family;...
live in a loving intimate relationship with God;... be transformed
through resurrection; and... be the kingdom
of God.
• Epistemology or
knowledge: God has revealed,
through Scripture and nature, that males are to hold authority over women the whole
of their
life.
In the first place, no amount
of prayer will take the place
of right discernment
of good and evil
through standards set by the outlook
of Jesus,
of right calculation
of the probable consequences
of our acts,
of right
knowledge and judgment
of the total situation in which our
lives are set.
He wants everyone to come to a
knowledge of the truth, and calls everyone to believe in Jesus for eternal
life, which is possible
through the will.
2Pe 1:3 - 11 According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto
life and godliness,
through the
knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue: 1Co 9:11 - 12 If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things?
The further the spiritual evolution
of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie
through the fear
of life, and the fear
of death, and blind faith, but
through striving after rational
knowledge.
Your Majesty, when we compare the present
life of man on earth with that time
of which we have no
knowledge, it seems to me like the swift flight
of a single sparrow
through the banqueting - hall where you are sitting at dinner on a winter's day with your thanes and counsellors.
But it would be a mistake to suppose that the Johannine doctrine
of eternal
life through knowledge of God is merely a variety
of the current teaching
of Hellenistic mysticism.
well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where most realize that
living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness
through the teachings
of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices
of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts
of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all
of all times or
knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth
of knowledge and understanding
of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage
of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak
of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities
of the present and the potential
of the future... so you try to
live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision
of the future based upon the past?
As Dom Gregory Dix, in a now famous section
of his book The Shape
of the Liturgy, put the matter, Christians
through the ages have known
of no better and more appropriate way to remember» Jesus than by participating in the offering
of the Eucharist as «the continual memory»
of his passion and death — which also means,
of course, the
life which preceded Calvary and the
knowledge of the risen Lord which followed the crucifixion.
The physical sciences and the
life sciences also yield their full harvest
of knowledge about man only when the understanding gained
through direct self - consciousness is used in the interpretation
of the methods and results
of objective scientific investigation and
of technical invention.
If Christ is our redeemer
through sharing fully in the human lot, surely he needed to have experienced the deeply limited nature
of human
knowledge: the ambiguity, confusion, misunderstandings, and perplexing situations which constantly arise and assail our
lives.
Both I and St Thomas consider that the soul continues to exercise thought and understanding (and indeed will, which is intellectual appetite) after death, and, as St Thomas explains, this can not be in synergism with the imagination in the way it is during human
life, but is made possible in ways God provides, and in this way the
life of purgatory allows the purification that most people need, while the Saints pray for the
living and the dead
of whom God gives them
knowledge through their vision
of Him.
To «know thyself» is the first order
of cognitive business, for to know the order
of the soul, and
through that
knowledge to achieve control
of one's
life, is wisdom.
Where a congregation lacks
knowledge or experience
of following the way
of Jesus, people can learn to
live the Christian
life through study and worship.
This kind
of knowledge is best appropriated
through participation in a community
of Christians who are self - conscious about their commitment to a Christian way
of life.
Self -
knowledge occurs
through participation in the structures
of life, not in a withdrawal into the self.
For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting
of man over against the sum total
of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality
of things themselves, are posited in the very idea
of creation and
of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition
of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted
through... In short, there are degrees
of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon
of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal
of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal
Knowledge (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1962).
The «will
of God» — what God wants for us — is for us to: * Be Free and Independent * Think * Be Curious * Be Intelligent and Wise * Value
Knowledge over Ignorance and Compassion over
Knowledge * Grow *
Live Long Healthy Satisfying
Lives *
Live Non-Violently Without Vengeance * Be Hospitable * Be Generous * Heal and Reconcile and Rehabilitate * Be Good Stewards
of all Resources *
Live Here as One Family *
Live in Relationship with God * Be Transformed
through Resurrection
Our age is in need
of a great philosopher; one who can thread his way, step by step,
through the intricate labyrinth
of reasoning into which scientists have been led, eyes riveted to earth, by the desire to improve our human lot, the desire to destroy
life, or mere common curiosity; one who can keep his mind, at the same time, open to the metaphysical implications
of all he learns, and at last put the wholecorpus
of our
knowledge together in one grand synthesis.
He writes, «The impasse into which Protestant theology has come
through its efforts to give significance to the resurrection tradition shows that the dogma
of pure reason does not have sufficient resources to give Protestantism that kind
of knowledge of Christian origins that its
life and doctrine require.»
God accepts whatever we bring to the God / person relationship — our physical and spiritual condition, personality, connection to reality, our participation in relationships, talents, inabilities, cognition,
knowledge, ignorance,
life journey, spiritual journey, walk about, wandering, seeking, questioning, questing, acceptance
of God, rejection
of God — and our emotional and mental status: hate / love, anger / peace, sadness / happiness, hurt / health, feeling lost and abandoned / feeling found and included, agitation / serenity, apathy / passion, confusion / clarity, fractures / wholeness — all
of this, all
of whoever we are and have ever been and every action committed or ever contemplated and every thought we ever explored or entertained or that flitted
through our mind — all
of this, we bring to the God / person relationship and God accepts the totality
of who we are and every component that comprises who we are — as a gift.
Or are you simply trying to establish relationships with different people to bear witness
of Christ
through your
life, so that they too, will eventually come to the
knowledge of the Truth?
Because
of these acts we know him to be real, accessible, and infinitely gracious, and in that
knowledge we find the promise
of both the coming
of his kingdom and the ultimate fulfillment
of our own
lives: «
Through the tender mercy
of our God, the dayspring from on high hath visited us, to give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow
of death, to guide our feet into the way
of peace.»
By «learning», I do not only refer to a increase
of knowledge, but a deepening
of one's own faith and faith
life as well as
of one's perception
of the triune God
through Jesus Christ in the Holy Spirit.
The second half
of the book is more
of a practical guide for
living a pure
life,
through spiritual preparation, self -
knowledge and spiritual combat.
«The forms
of a
living being are not but rather come to be,» says Ludwig von Bertalanffy (BW 120), and his «organismic» biology and later general system - theory for overcoming the opposition between mechanism and vitalism has given central insights
of Whitehead a new formulation on the basis
of science, 8 Something similar holds for all the directions
of research which Jean Piaget has brought to the [264] concept
of genetic structuralism.9 The genetic epistemology founded by Piaget has proved
through empirical research on the problem
of knowledge the fruitfulness both
of genetic analysis and
of Whitehead's principle
of process.
It is
through this that man participates in God and acquires
knowledge of Him, which is
life for him.
But exactly what he said and exactly how he acted is filtered, for all
of time,
through those who saw and heard him: «The only
knowledge we possess
of the Christ event reaches us via the concrete experience
of the first local communities
of Christians who were sensitive
of a new
life present in them.»
The cosmic tide may at one time have seemed to be immobilized, lost in the vast reservoir
of living forms; but
through the ages the level
of consciousness was steadily rising behind the barrier, until finally, by means
of the human brain (the most «centro - complex» organism yet achieved to our
knowledge in the universe) there has occurred, at a first ending
of time, the breaking
of the dykes, followed by what is now in progress, the flooding
of Thought over the entire surface
of the biosphere.
When a person becomes a Christian, they do so
through the saving
KNOWLEDGE of Christ which get incorporated into their faith and belief system, and
through Baptism and infusion
of the Holy Spirit continues to cause regeneration in the
life of a person until they die, and inherit eternal
life.
They are, first, the development
of the student's emotional, intellectual, social, and professional
life; second,
knowledge and understanding
of human behavior in breadth and depth; and third, the ability to relate to others therapeutically
through an understanding
of psychotherapeutic approaches and processes.
Later,
through the lips
of her companion she made a brief response, thanking them for «a deed
of generosity from the masters
of knowledge and light to those who
live under the covert
of denial.»
The path
of contextual theology is not so much one from faith to the clarity
of knowledge about it, but rather a movement from
life to the faith - experience
of its mystery
through the process
of dialogue.
Just as male and female were split into duality, so they chose duality
through the «Tree
of Knowledge of Good and Evil» (read: they chose to become flesh on the material plane in the «solid earth» that we
live in currently), in order to come to this plane to «work back» to the original divine androgyny originally intended.
When the context is ambiguous and interpreters do not agree on the nature
of the reference as in II Peter 1:3 («his divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to
life and godliness,
through the
knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence»), the Guaraní translator must make a decision which the English translator does not have to make.
This is clearly not a matter
of rational
knowledge; rather does the
living consciousness grasp reality
through the symbol, anterior to reflection.
It is quite another order
of knowledge that discloses, for example, the «lunar destiny»
of human existence, the fact that man is «measured» by the temporal rhythms illustrated by the phases
of the moon, that he is fated to die but, quite like the moon which reappears after three days
of darkness, man too can begin his existence anew, that in any case he nourishes the hope in a
life after death, assured or ameliorated
through an initiation ritual.
He assumed that the study
of the teaching
of Jesus `... has an independent interest
of its own and a definite interest
of its own and a definite task
of its own, namely, that we use every resource we possess
of knowledge,
of historical imagination, and
of religious insight to the one end
of transporting ourselves back into the centre
of the greatest crisis in the world's history, to look as it were
through the eyes
of Jesus and to see God and man, heaven and earth,
life and death, as he saw them, and to find, if we may, in that vision something which will satisfy the whole man in mind and heart and will».
The forms
of love known in the Bible are derived from those events in which men come to
knowledge of the meaning
of life through what happens in history.
There is one thing for sure, that I can stake my
life on: that if any human being seeks to Know the Truth, and pursues relentlessly, not willing to settle for anything less, and seeks it with a humble heart, God will REVEAL HIMSELF to this person, and this person will ultimately come to the
knowledge of Him —
through Jesus Christ, His Son whom HE sent to this world to reveal, and declare to us Him, God the Father, the Creator, to declare who He is, His nature, and His character.
Or if they are already in it
through present membership, we are preaching with the purpose that they may grow in the
knowledge and love
of Christ, the Church's Lord, more fully appropriate his grace in the community
of his people, and more profoundly realize what it means to be incorporated into his ongoing
life in the fellowship
of the Church.
In spite
of the fact that Socrates studied with all diligence to acquire a
knowledge of human nature and to understand himself, and in spite
of the fame accorded him
through the centuries as one who beyond all other men had an insight into the human heart, he has himself admitted that the reason for his shrinking from reflection upon the nature
of such beings as Pegasus and the Gorgons was that he, the
life - long student
of human nature, had not yet been able to make up his mind whether he was a stranger monster than Typhon, or a creature
of a gentler and simpler sort, partaking
of something divine (Phaedrus, 229 E).